| 1 | //===- LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp - Loop Access Analysis Implementation --------==// |
| 2 | // |
| 3 | // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| 4 | // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| 5 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| 6 | // |
| 7 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| 8 | // |
| 9 | // The implementation for the loop memory dependence that was originally |
| 10 | // developed for the loop vectorizer. |
| 11 | // |
| 12 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| 13 | |
| 14 | #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h" |
| 15 | #include "llvm/ADT/APInt.h" |
| 16 | #include "llvm/ADT/BitVector.h" |
| 17 | #include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h" |
| 18 | #include "llvm/ADT/EquivalenceClasses.h" |
| 19 | #include "llvm/ADT/MapVector.h" |
| 20 | #include "llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h" |
| 21 | #include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h" |
| 22 | #include "llvm/ADT/SetVector.h" |
| 23 | #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" |
| 24 | #include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h" |
| 25 | #include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" |
| 26 | #include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h" |
| 27 | #include "llvm/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.h" |
| 28 | #include "llvm/Analysis/AssumeBundleQueries.h" |
| 29 | #include "llvm/Analysis/AssumptionCache.h" |
| 30 | #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAnalysisManager.h" |
| 31 | #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h" |
| 32 | #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopIterator.h" |
| 33 | #include "llvm/Analysis/MemoryLocation.h" |
| 34 | #include "llvm/Analysis/OptimizationRemarkEmitter.h" |
| 35 | #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h" |
| 36 | #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h" |
| 37 | #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionPatternMatch.h" |
| 38 | #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h" |
| 39 | #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h" |
| 40 | #include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h" |
| 41 | #include "llvm/Analysis/VectorUtils.h" |
| 42 | #include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h" |
| 43 | #include "llvm/IR/Constants.h" |
| 44 | #include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h" |
| 45 | #include "llvm/IR/DebugLoc.h" |
| 46 | #include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h" |
| 47 | #include "llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h" |
| 48 | #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" |
| 49 | #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" |
| 50 | #include "llvm/IR/InstrTypes.h" |
| 51 | #include "llvm/IR/Instruction.h" |
| 52 | #include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h" |
| 53 | #include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h" |
| 54 | #include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h" |
| 55 | #include "llvm/IR/Type.h" |
| 56 | #include "llvm/IR/Value.h" |
| 57 | #include "llvm/IR/ValueHandle.h" |
| 58 | #include "llvm/Support/Casting.h" |
| 59 | #include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" |
| 60 | #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" |
| 61 | #include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h" |
| 62 | #include "llvm/Support/MathExtras.h" |
| 63 | #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" |
| 64 | #include <algorithm> |
| 65 | #include <cassert> |
| 66 | #include <cstdint> |
| 67 | #include <iterator> |
| 68 | #include <utility> |
| 69 | #include <variant> |
| 70 | #include <vector> |
| 71 | |
| 72 | using namespace llvm; |
| 73 | using namespace llvm::SCEVPatternMatch; |
| 74 | |
| 75 | #define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-accesses" |
| 76 | |
| 77 | static cl::opt<ElementCount, true> |
| 78 | VectorizationFactor("force-vector-width" , cl::Hidden, |
| 79 | cl::desc("Sets the SIMD width. Zero is autoselect." ), |
| 80 | cl::location(L&: VectorizerParams::VectorizationFactor)); |
| 81 | ElementCount VectorizerParams::VectorizationFactor; |
| 82 | |
| 83 | static cl::opt<unsigned, true> |
| 84 | VectorizationInterleave("force-vector-interleave" , cl::Hidden, |
| 85 | cl::desc("Sets the vectorization interleave count. " |
| 86 | "Zero is autoselect." ), |
| 87 | cl::location( |
| 88 | L&: VectorizerParams::VectorizationInterleave)); |
| 89 | unsigned VectorizerParams::VectorizationInterleave; |
| 90 | |
| 91 | static cl::opt<unsigned, true> RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold( |
| 92 | "runtime-memory-check-threshold" , cl::Hidden, |
| 93 | cl::desc("When performing memory disambiguation checks at runtime do not " |
| 94 | "generate more than this number of comparisons (default = 8)." ), |
| 95 | cl::location(L&: VectorizerParams::RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold), cl::init(Val: 8)); |
| 96 | unsigned VectorizerParams::RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold; |
| 97 | |
| 98 | static cl::opt<unsigned, true> VectorizeMemoryCheckThreshold( |
| 99 | "vectorize-memory-check-threshold" , cl::Hidden, |
| 100 | cl::desc("The maximum allowed number of runtime memory checks" ), |
| 101 | cl::location(L&: VectorizerParams::VectorizeMemoryCheckThreshold), |
| 102 | cl::init(Val: 128)); |
| 103 | unsigned VectorizerParams::VectorizeMemoryCheckThreshold; |
| 104 | |
| 105 | /// The maximum iterations used to merge memory checks |
| 106 | static cl::opt<unsigned> MemoryCheckMergeThreshold( |
| 107 | "memory-check-merge-threshold" , cl::Hidden, |
| 108 | cl::desc("Maximum number of comparisons done when trying to merge " |
| 109 | "runtime memory checks. (default = 100)" ), |
| 110 | cl::init(Val: 100)); |
| 111 | |
| 112 | enum class StencilMergePolicy { Off, Auto, Force }; |
| 113 | |
| 114 | static cl::opt<StencilMergePolicy> StencilMerge( |
| 115 | "stencil-runtime-check-merge" , cl::Hidden, |
| 116 | cl::desc("Control stencil-pattern merging of runtime memory checks" ), |
| 117 | cl::init(Val: StencilMergePolicy::Off), |
| 118 | cl::values( |
| 119 | clEnumValN(StencilMergePolicy::Off, "off" , |
| 120 | "Disable stencil merge (default)" ), |
| 121 | clEnumValN(StencilMergePolicy::Auto, "auto" , |
| 122 | "Enable stencil merge when runtime check count exceeds " |
| 123 | "-vectorize-memory-check-threshold" ), |
| 124 | clEnumValN(StencilMergePolicy::Force, "force" , |
| 125 | "Always attempt stencil merge regardless of check " |
| 126 | "count" ))); |
| 127 | |
| 128 | static cl::opt<unsigned> StencilMergeMaxGroups( |
| 129 | "stencil-merge-max-groups" , cl::Hidden, |
| 130 | cl::desc( |
| 131 | "Skip stencil group merging when the number of runtime checking groups " |
| 132 | "exceeds this limit, to bound compile time (default =4096)." ), |
| 133 | cl::init(Val: 4096)); |
| 134 | |
| 135 | /// Maximum SIMD width. |
| 136 | const unsigned VectorizerParams::MaxVectorWidth = 64; |
| 137 | |
| 138 | /// We collect dependences up to this threshold. |
| 139 | static cl::opt<unsigned> |
| 140 | MaxDependences("max-dependences" , cl::Hidden, |
| 141 | cl::desc("Maximum number of dependences collected by " |
| 142 | "loop-access analysis (default = 100)" ), |
| 143 | cl::init(Val: 100)); |
| 144 | |
| 145 | /// This enables versioning on the strides of symbolically striding memory |
| 146 | /// accesses in code like the following. |
| 147 | /// for (i = 0; i < N; ++i) |
| 148 | /// A[i * Stride1] += B[i * Stride2] ... |
| 149 | /// |
| 150 | /// Will be roughly translated to |
| 151 | /// if (Stride1 == 1 && Stride2 == 1) { |
| 152 | /// for (i = 0; i < N; i+=4) |
| 153 | /// A[i:i+3] += ... |
| 154 | /// } else |
| 155 | /// ... |
| 156 | static cl::opt<bool> EnableMemAccessVersioning( |
| 157 | "enable-mem-access-versioning" , cl::init(Val: true), cl::Hidden, |
| 158 | cl::desc("Enable symbolic stride memory access versioning" )); |
| 159 | |
| 160 | /// Enable store-to-load forwarding conflict detection. This option can |
| 161 | /// be disabled for correctness testing. |
| 162 | static cl::opt<bool> EnableForwardingConflictDetection( |
| 163 | "store-to-load-forwarding-conflict-detection" , cl::Hidden, |
| 164 | cl::desc("Enable conflict detection in loop-access analysis" ), |
| 165 | cl::init(Val: true)); |
| 166 | |
| 167 | static cl::opt<unsigned> MaxForkedSCEVDepth( |
| 168 | "max-forked-scev-depth" , cl::Hidden, |
| 169 | cl::desc("Maximum recursion depth when finding forked SCEVs (default = 5)" ), |
| 170 | cl::init(Val: 5)); |
| 171 | |
| 172 | static cl::opt<bool> SpeculateUnitStride( |
| 173 | "laa-speculate-unit-stride" , cl::Hidden, |
| 174 | cl::desc("Speculate that non-constant strides are unit in LAA" ), |
| 175 | cl::init(Val: true)); |
| 176 | |
| 177 | static cl::opt<bool, true> HoistRuntimeChecks( |
| 178 | "hoist-runtime-checks" , cl::Hidden, |
| 179 | cl::desc( |
| 180 | "Hoist inner loop runtime memory checks to outer loop if possible" ), |
| 181 | cl::location(L&: VectorizerParams::HoistRuntimeChecks), cl::init(Val: true)); |
| 182 | bool VectorizerParams::HoistRuntimeChecks; |
| 183 | |
| 184 | bool VectorizerParams::isInterleaveForced() { |
| 185 | return ::VectorizationInterleave.getNumOccurrences() > 0; |
| 186 | } |
| 187 | |
| 188 | const SCEV *llvm::replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV( |
| 189 | PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE, const Loop *Lp, |
| 190 | const SymbolicStrideMap &PtrToStride, Value *Ptr, |
| 191 | SmallVectorImpl<const SCEVPredicate *> *Predicates) { |
| 192 | const SCEV *OrigSCEV = PSE.getSCEV(V: Ptr); |
| 193 | |
| 194 | // If there is an entry in the map return the SCEV of the pointer with the |
| 195 | // symbolic stride replaced by one. |
| 196 | const SCEVUnknown *StrideSCEV = PtrToStride.lookup(Val: Ptr); |
| 197 | if (!StrideSCEV) |
| 198 | // For a non-symbolic stride, just return the original expression. |
| 199 | return OrigSCEV; |
| 200 | |
| 201 | ScalarEvolution *SE = PSE.getSE(); |
| 202 | const SCEV *CT = SE->getOne(Ty: StrideSCEV->getType()); |
| 203 | const SCEV *Expr; |
| 204 | const SCEVPredicate *EqPred = SE->getEqualPredicate(LHS: StrideSCEV, RHS: CT); |
| 205 | if (Predicates) { |
| 206 | Predicates->push_back(Elt: EqPred); |
| 207 | Expr = SE->rewriteUsingPredicate(S: OrigSCEV, L: Lp, |
| 208 | A: SCEVUnionPredicate(*Predicates, *SE)); |
| 209 | } else { |
| 210 | PSE.addPredicate(Pred: *EqPred); |
| 211 | Expr = PSE.getSCEV(V: Ptr); |
| 212 | } |
| 213 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Replacing SCEV: " << *OrigSCEV << " by: " << *Expr |
| 214 | << "\n" ); |
| 215 | return Expr; |
| 216 | } |
| 217 | |
| 218 | RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup::RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup( |
| 219 | unsigned Index, const RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck) |
| 220 | : High(RtCheck.Pointers[Index].End), Low(RtCheck.Pointers[Index].Start), |
| 221 | AddressSpace(RtCheck.Pointers[Index] |
| 222 | .PointerValue->getType() |
| 223 | ->getPointerAddressSpace()), |
| 224 | NeedsFreeze(RtCheck.Pointers[Index].NeedsFreeze) { |
| 225 | Members.push_back(Elt: Index); |
| 226 | } |
| 227 | |
| 228 | /// Returns \p A + \p B, if it is guaranteed not to unsigned wrap. Otherwise |
| 229 | /// return nullptr. \p A and \p B must have the same type. |
| 230 | static const SCEV *addSCEVNoOverflow(const SCEV *A, const SCEV *B, |
| 231 | ScalarEvolution &SE) { |
| 232 | if (!SE.willNotOverflow(BinOp: Instruction::Add, /*IsSigned=*/Signed: false, LHS: A, RHS: B)) |
| 233 | return nullptr; |
| 234 | return SE.getAddExpr(LHS: A, RHS: B); |
| 235 | } |
| 236 | |
| 237 | /// Returns \p A * \p B, if it is guaranteed not to unsigned wrap. Otherwise |
| 238 | /// return nullptr. \p A and \p B must have the same type. |
| 239 | static const SCEV *mulSCEVNoOverflow(const SCEV *A, const SCEV *B, |
| 240 | ScalarEvolution &SE) { |
| 241 | if (!SE.willNotOverflow(BinOp: Instruction::Mul, /*IsSigned=*/Signed: false, LHS: A, RHS: B)) |
| 242 | return nullptr; |
| 243 | return SE.getMulExpr(LHS: A, RHS: B); |
| 244 | } |
| 245 | |
| 246 | /// Return true, if evaluating \p AR at \p MaxBTC cannot wrap, because \p AR at |
| 247 | /// \p MaxBTC is guaranteed inbounds of the accessed object. |
| 248 | static bool evaluatePtrAddRecAtMaxBTCWillNotWrap( |
| 249 | const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR, const SCEV *MaxBTC, const SCEV *EltSize, |
| 250 | ScalarEvolution &SE, const DataLayout &DL, DominatorTree *DT, |
| 251 | AssumptionCache *AC, ScalarEvolution::LoopGuards &LoopGuards) { |
| 252 | auto *PointerBase = SE.getPointerBase(V: AR->getStart()); |
| 253 | auto *StartPtr = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(Val: PointerBase); |
| 254 | if (!StartPtr) |
| 255 | return false; |
| 256 | const Loop *L = AR->getLoop(); |
| 257 | bool CheckForNonNull; |
| 258 | Value *StartPtrV = StartPtr->getValue(); |
| 259 | // We can ignore frees, as the fact that an object of a certain size existed |
| 260 | // at the location *at some point* is sufficient to derive the nowrap fact. |
| 261 | uint64_t DerefBytes = StartPtrV->getPointerDereferenceableBytes( |
| 262 | DL, CanBeNull&: CheckForNonNull, /*CanBeFreed=*/nullptr); |
| 263 | |
| 264 | // If the deref size is only known when the pointer is non-null, ignore it |
| 265 | // here and fall back to a dereferenceable assumption below. |
| 266 | if (DerefBytes && CheckForNonNull) |
| 267 | DerefBytes = 0; |
| 268 | |
| 269 | const SCEV *Step = AR->getStepRecurrence(SE); |
| 270 | Type *WiderTy = SE.getWiderType(Ty1: MaxBTC->getType(), Ty2: Step->getType()); |
| 271 | const SCEV *DerefBytesSCEV = SE.getConstant(Ty: WiderTy, V: DerefBytes); |
| 272 | |
| 273 | // Check if we have a suitable dereferencable assumption we can use. |
| 274 | Instruction *CtxI = &*L->getHeader()->getFirstNonPHIIt(); |
| 275 | if (BasicBlock *LoopPred = L->getLoopPredecessor()) { |
| 276 | if (isa<UncondBrInst, CondBrInst>(Val: LoopPred->getTerminator())) |
| 277 | CtxI = LoopPred->getTerminator(); |
| 278 | } |
| 279 | getKnowledgeForValue( |
| 280 | V: StartPtrV, AttrKinds: Attribute::Dereferenceable, AC&: *AC, |
| 281 | Filter: [&](RetainedKnowledge RK, Instruction *Assume, auto) { |
| 282 | if (!isValidAssumeForContext(I: Assume, CtxI, DT)) |
| 283 | return false; |
| 284 | const SCEV *DerefRKSCEV = SE.getSCEV(V: RK.IRArgValue); |
| 285 | Type *CommonTy = |
| 286 | SE.getWiderType(Ty1: DerefBytesSCEV->getType(), Ty2: DerefRKSCEV->getType()); |
| 287 | DerefBytesSCEV = SE.getNoopOrZeroExtend(V: DerefBytesSCEV, Ty: CommonTy); |
| 288 | DerefRKSCEV = SE.getNoopOrZeroExtend(V: DerefRKSCEV, Ty: CommonTy); |
| 289 | DerefBytesSCEV = SE.getUMaxExpr(LHS: DerefBytesSCEV, RHS: DerefRKSCEV); |
| 290 | // Continue with other assumptions. |
| 291 | return false; |
| 292 | }); |
| 293 | |
| 294 | if (DerefBytesSCEV->isZero()) |
| 295 | return false; |
| 296 | |
| 297 | bool IsKnownNonNegative = SE.isKnownNonNegative(S: Step); |
| 298 | if (!IsKnownNonNegative && !SE.isKnownNegative(S: Step)) |
| 299 | return false; |
| 300 | |
| 301 | WiderTy = SE.getWiderType(Ty1: WiderTy, Ty2: DerefBytesSCEV->getType()); |
| 302 | Step = SE.getNoopOrSignExtend(V: Step, Ty: WiderTy); |
| 303 | MaxBTC = SE.getNoopOrZeroExtend(V: MaxBTC, Ty: WiderTy); |
| 304 | |
| 305 | // For the computations below, make sure they don't unsigned wrap. |
| 306 | // FIXME: for a negative step the lowest accessed address is not |
| 307 | // AR->getStart() but AR->evaluateAtIteration(MaxBTC, SE); the check below |
| 308 | // therefore compares StartPtr against the highest accessed address instead |
| 309 | // of the lowest. |
| 310 | if (!SE.isKnownPredicate(Pred: CmpInst::ICMP_UGE, LHS: AR->getStart(), RHS: StartPtr)) |
| 311 | return false; |
| 312 | const SCEV *StartOffset = SE.getNoopOrZeroExtend( |
| 313 | V: SE.getMinusSCEV(LHS: AR->getStart(), RHS: StartPtr), Ty: WiderTy); |
| 314 | |
| 315 | MaxBTC = SE.applyLoopGuards(Expr: MaxBTC, Guards&: LoopGuards); |
| 316 | |
| 317 | const SCEV *AbsStep = SE.getAbsExpr(Op: Step, /*IsNSW=*/false); |
| 318 | // Total distance (in bytes) between the first and the last |
| 319 | // accessed pointer. |
| 320 | const SCEV *DistToLastIter = mulSCEVNoOverflow(A: MaxBTC, B: AbsStep, SE); |
| 321 | if (!DistToLastIter) { |
| 322 | // Re-try with constant max backedge-taken count if using the symbolic one |
| 323 | // failed. |
| 324 | MaxBTC = SE.getConstantMaxBackedgeTakenCount(L: AR->getLoop()); |
| 325 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: MaxBTC)) |
| 326 | return false; |
| 327 | MaxBTC = SE.getNoopOrZeroExtend(V: MaxBTC, Ty: WiderTy); |
| 328 | DistToLastIter = mulSCEVNoOverflow(A: MaxBTC, B: AbsStep, SE); |
| 329 | if (!DistToLastIter) |
| 330 | return false; |
| 331 | } |
| 332 | |
| 333 | // Total length in bytes of the accessed range (from the first accessed |
| 334 | // byte through the end of the last access). |
| 335 | const SCEV *AccessedBytes = addSCEVNoOverflow( |
| 336 | A: DistToLastIter, B: SE.getNoopOrZeroExtend(V: EltSize, Ty: WiderTy), SE); |
| 337 | if (!AccessedBytes) |
| 338 | return false; |
| 339 | |
| 340 | // Compute MaxOffset per direction: exclusive upper offset of the |
| 341 | // accessed range. |
| 342 | const SCEV *MaxOffset; |
| 343 | if (IsKnownNonNegative) { |
| 344 | MaxOffset = addSCEVNoOverflow(A: StartOffset, B: AccessedBytes, SE); |
| 345 | if (!MaxOffset) |
| 346 | return false; |
| 347 | DerefBytesSCEV = SE.applyLoopGuards(Expr: DerefBytesSCEV, Guards&: LoopGuards); |
| 348 | } else { |
| 349 | // FIXME: two independent off-by-EltSize bugs on this branch: |
| 350 | // 1. StartOffset here is actually the HIGHEST offset, because it is |
| 351 | // computed from AR->getStart() rather than |
| 352 | // AR->evaluateAtIteration(MaxBTC, SE) (see FIXME above). |
| 353 | // 2. The lower check is over-strict by EltSize and the upper is |
| 354 | // under-counted by EltSize. |
| 355 | assert(SE.isKnownNegative(Step) && "must be known negative" ); |
| 356 | if (!SE.isKnownPredicate(Pred: CmpInst::ICMP_SGE, LHS: StartOffset, RHS: AccessedBytes)) |
| 357 | return false; |
| 358 | MaxOffset = StartOffset; |
| 359 | } |
| 360 | // MaxOffset must not exceed the deref-region end. |
| 361 | return SE.isKnownPredicate(Pred: CmpInst::ICMP_ULE, LHS: MaxOffset, RHS: DerefBytesSCEV); |
| 362 | } |
| 363 | |
| 364 | /// Return true if \p S is known to be monotonically non-decreasing |
| 365 | /// (in the unsigned sense, without unsigned wrap) across iterations of \p L. |
| 366 | static bool isKnownNonDecreasingInLoop(const SCEV *S, const Loop *L, |
| 367 | ScalarEvolution &SE) { |
| 368 | if (SE.isLoopInvariant(S, L)) |
| 369 | return true; |
| 370 | |
| 371 | switch (S->getSCEVType()) { |
| 372 | case scUDivExpr: { |
| 373 | // Non-decreasing in the numerator when the divisor is loop-invariant. |
| 374 | const auto *UDiv = cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(Val: S); |
| 375 | return SE.isLoopInvariant(S: UDiv->getRHS(), L) && |
| 376 | isKnownNonDecreasingInLoop(S: UDiv->getLHS(), L, SE); |
| 377 | } |
| 378 | case scAddRecExpr: { |
| 379 | auto *AR = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: S); |
| 380 | assert(AR->getLoop() == L && |
| 381 | "trying to check for AddRec in different loop" ); |
| 382 | return SE.getMonotonicPredicateType(LHS: AR, Pred: ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE) == |
| 383 | ScalarEvolution::MonotonicPredicateType::MonotonicallyIncreasing; |
| 384 | } |
| 385 | case scAddExpr: |
| 386 | case scMulExpr: { |
| 387 | const auto *NAry = cast<SCEVNAryExpr>(Val: S); |
| 388 | if (!NAry->hasNoUnsignedWrap()) |
| 389 | return false; |
| 390 | // With NUW, the exact sum or product fits in the type, so it is |
| 391 | // non-decreasing if every operandis. |
| 392 | return all_of(Range: NAry->operands(), P: [&](const SCEV *Op) { |
| 393 | return isKnownNonDecreasingInLoop(S: Op, L, SE); |
| 394 | }); |
| 395 | } |
| 396 | default: |
| 397 | return false; |
| 398 | } |
| 399 | } |
| 400 | |
| 401 | /// Try to bound a loop-variant pointer that is not an affine AddRec. |
| 402 | /// |
| 403 | /// If the offset is provably monotonically non-decreasing the accessed range is |
| 404 | /// bounded by the offset's value at the first iteration (via |
| 405 | /// SplitIntoInitAndPostInc) and last iteration (via getSCEVAtScope). The |
| 406 | /// returned range is half-open: \p EltSizeSCEV is added to the address of the |
| 407 | /// last accessed element to form the end. |
| 408 | /// |
| 409 | /// Returns {nullptr, nullptr} if no such bound can be formed. |
| 410 | static std::pair<const SCEV *, const SCEV *> |
| 411 | getNonAffineMonotonicBounds(const Loop *Lp, const SCEV *PtrExpr, |
| 412 | const SCEV *EltSizeSCEV, ScalarEvolution *SE) { |
| 413 | const auto *PtrAdd = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Val: PtrExpr); |
| 414 | if (!PtrAdd || !PtrAdd->hasNoUnsignedWrap()) |
| 415 | return {nullptr, nullptr}; |
| 416 | |
| 417 | const SCEV *Base = *find_if(Range: PtrAdd->operands(), P: [](const auto &Op) { |
| 418 | return Op->getType()->isPointerTy(); |
| 419 | }); |
| 420 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: Base) || !SE->isLoopInvariant(S: Base, L: Lp)) |
| 421 | return {nullptr, nullptr}; |
| 422 | |
| 423 | const SCEV *Offset = SE->getMinusSCEV(LHS: PtrExpr, RHS: Base); |
| 424 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: Offset) || |
| 425 | !isKnownNonDecreasingInLoop(S: Offset, L: Lp, SE&: *SE)) |
| 426 | return {nullptr, nullptr}; |
| 427 | |
| 428 | const SCEV *OffStart = SE->SplitIntoInitAndPostInc(L: Lp, S: Offset).first; |
| 429 | const SCEV *OffEnd = SE->getSCEVAtScope(S: Offset, L: Lp->getParentLoop()); |
| 430 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: OffStart) || isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: OffEnd) || |
| 431 | !SE->isLoopInvariant(S: OffStart, L: Lp) || !SE->isLoopInvariant(S: OffEnd, L: Lp)) |
| 432 | return {nullptr, nullptr}; |
| 433 | |
| 434 | return {SE->getAddExpr(LHS: Base, RHS: OffStart), |
| 435 | SE->getAddExpr(Op0: Base, Op1: OffEnd, Op2: EltSizeSCEV)}; |
| 436 | } |
| 437 | |
| 438 | std::pair<const SCEV *, const SCEV *> llvm::getStartAndEndForAccess( |
| 439 | const Loop *Lp, const SCEV *PtrExpr, Type *AccessTy, const SCEV *BTC, |
| 440 | const SCEV *MaxBTC, ScalarEvolution *SE, |
| 441 | DenseMap<std::pair<const SCEV *, const SCEV *>, |
| 442 | std::pair<const SCEV *, const SCEV *>> *PointerBounds, |
| 443 | DominatorTree *DT, AssumptionCache *AC, |
| 444 | ScalarEvolution::LoopGuards &LoopGuards) { |
| 445 | auto &DL = Lp->getHeader()->getDataLayout(); |
| 446 | Type *IdxTy = DL.getIndexType(PtrTy: PtrExpr->getType()); |
| 447 | const SCEV *EltSizeSCEV = SE->getStoreSizeOfExpr(IntTy: IdxTy, StoreTy: AccessTy); |
| 448 | |
| 449 | // Delegate to the SCEV-based overload, passing through the cache. |
| 450 | return getStartAndEndForAccess(Lp, PtrExpr, EltSizeSCEV, BTC, MaxBTC, SE, |
| 451 | PointerBounds, DT, AC, LoopGuards); |
| 452 | } |
| 453 | |
| 454 | std::pair<const SCEV *, const SCEV *> llvm::getStartAndEndForAccess( |
| 455 | const Loop *Lp, const SCEV *PtrExpr, const SCEV *EltSizeSCEV, |
| 456 | const SCEV *BTC, const SCEV *MaxBTC, ScalarEvolution *SE, |
| 457 | DenseMap<std::pair<const SCEV *, const SCEV *>, |
| 458 | std::pair<const SCEV *, const SCEV *>> *PointerBounds, |
| 459 | DominatorTree *DT, AssumptionCache *AC, |
| 460 | ScalarEvolution::LoopGuards &LoopGuards) { |
| 461 | std::pair<const SCEV *, const SCEV *> *PtrBoundsPair; |
| 462 | if (PointerBounds) { |
| 463 | auto [Iter, Ins] = PointerBounds->insert( |
| 464 | KV: {{PtrExpr, EltSizeSCEV}, |
| 465 | {SE->getCouldNotCompute(), SE->getCouldNotCompute()}}); |
| 466 | if (!Ins) |
| 467 | return Iter->second; |
| 468 | PtrBoundsPair = &Iter->second; |
| 469 | } |
| 470 | |
| 471 | // ScStart is the lowest accessed address; ScEnd is the highest one plus the |
| 472 | // size of the accessed element. |
| 473 | const SCEV *ScStart; |
| 474 | const SCEV *ScEnd; |
| 475 | |
| 476 | auto &DL = Lp->getHeader()->getDataLayout(); |
| 477 | if (SE->isLoopInvariant(S: PtrExpr, L: Lp)) { |
| 478 | ScStart = PtrExpr; |
| 479 | ScEnd = SE->getAddExpr(LHS: PtrExpr, RHS: EltSizeSCEV); |
| 480 | } else if (auto *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: PtrExpr)) { |
| 481 | assert(AR->getLoop() == Lp && "LoopGuards must be the guards of Lp" ); |
| 482 | const SCEV *Step = AR->getStepRecurrence(SE&: *SE); |
| 483 | // The address of the last accessed element, if it can be computed |
| 484 | // precisely. |
| 485 | const SCEV *LastAddr = nullptr; |
| 486 | if (!isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: BTC)) { |
| 487 | // Evaluating AR at an exact BTC is safe: LAA separately checks that |
| 488 | // accesses cannot wrap in the loop. If evaluating AR at BTC wraps, then |
| 489 | // the loop either triggers UB when executing a memory access with a |
| 490 | // poison pointer or the wrapping/poisoned pointer is not used. |
| 491 | LastAddr = AR->evaluateAtIteration(It: BTC, SE&: *SE); |
| 492 | } else if (evaluatePtrAddRecAtMaxBTCWillNotWrap( |
| 493 | AR, MaxBTC, EltSize: EltSizeSCEV, SE&: *SE, DL, DT, AC, LoopGuards)) { |
| 494 | LastAddr = AR->evaluateAtIteration(It: MaxBTC, SE&: *SE); |
| 495 | } |
| 496 | const SCEV *Start = AR->getStart(); |
| 497 | Type *PtrTy = AR->getType(); |
| 498 | if (SE->isKnownNegative(S: Step)) { |
| 499 | ScStart = |
| 500 | LastAddr |
| 501 | ? LastAddr |
| 502 | : SE->getSCEV(V: ConstantExpr::getIntToPtr( |
| 503 | C: Constant::getNullValue(Ty: DL.getIndexType(PtrTy)), Ty: PtrTy)); |
| 504 | ScEnd = SE->getAddExpr(LHS: Start, RHS: EltSizeSCEV); |
| 505 | } else if (SE->isKnownNonNegative(S: Step)) { |
| 506 | ScStart = Start; |
| 507 | // The highest address for the type saturates; adding EltSize to it would |
| 508 | // wrap to the start of the address space. |
| 509 | if (LastAddr) |
| 510 | ScEnd = SE->getAddExpr(LHS: LastAddr, RHS: EltSizeSCEV); |
| 511 | else |
| 512 | ScEnd = SE->getSCEV(V: ConstantExpr::getIntToPtr( |
| 513 | C: Constant::getAllOnesValue(Ty: DL.getIndexType(PtrTy)), Ty: PtrTy)); |
| 514 | } else { |
| 515 | if (!LastAddr) |
| 516 | return {SE->getCouldNotCompute(), SE->getCouldNotCompute()}; |
| 517 | // Fallback case: the step is not constant, but we can still |
| 518 | // get the upper and lower bounds of the interval by using min/max |
| 519 | // expressions. |
| 520 | ScStart = SE->getUMinExpr(LHS: Start, RHS: LastAddr); |
| 521 | ScEnd = SE->getAddExpr(LHS: SE->getUMaxExpr(LHS: Start, RHS: LastAddr), RHS: EltSizeSCEV); |
| 522 | } |
| 523 | } else { |
| 524 | // The pointer is loop-variant but not an affine AddRec. Try to form a |
| 525 | // tight bound for a monotonic offset (see getNonAffineMonotonicBounds). |
| 526 | std::tie(args&: ScStart, args&: ScEnd) = |
| 527 | getNonAffineMonotonicBounds(Lp, PtrExpr, EltSizeSCEV, SE); |
| 528 | if (!ScStart) |
| 529 | return {SE->getCouldNotCompute(), SE->getCouldNotCompute()}; |
| 530 | } |
| 531 | |
| 532 | assert(SE->isLoopInvariant(ScStart, Lp) && "ScStart needs to be invariant" ); |
| 533 | assert(SE->isLoopInvariant(ScEnd, Lp) && "ScEnd needs to be invariant" ); |
| 534 | |
| 535 | std::pair<const SCEV *, const SCEV *> Res = {ScStart, ScEnd}; |
| 536 | if (PointerBounds) |
| 537 | *PtrBoundsPair = Res; |
| 538 | return Res; |
| 539 | } |
| 540 | |
| 541 | /// Calculate Start and End points of memory access using |
| 542 | /// getStartAndEndForAccess. |
| 543 | bool RuntimePointerChecking::insert(Loop *Lp, Value *Ptr, const SCEV *PtrExpr, |
| 544 | Type *AccessTy, bool WritePtr, |
| 545 | unsigned DepSetId, unsigned ASId, |
| 546 | PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE, |
| 547 | bool NeedsFreeze, bool IsForked) { |
| 548 | const SCEV *SymbolicMaxBTC = PSE.getSymbolicMaxBackedgeTakenCount(); |
| 549 | const SCEV *BTC = PSE.getBackedgeTakenCount(); |
| 550 | const auto &[ScStart, ScEnd] = getStartAndEndForAccess( |
| 551 | Lp, PtrExpr, AccessTy, BTC, MaxBTC: SymbolicMaxBTC, SE: PSE.getSE(), |
| 552 | PointerBounds: &DC.getPointerBounds(), DT: DC.getDT(), AC: DC.getAC(), LoopGuards); |
| 553 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: ScStart) || isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: ScEnd)) |
| 554 | return false; |
| 555 | Pointers.emplace_back(Args&: Ptr, Args: ScStart, Args: ScEnd, Args&: WritePtr, Args&: DepSetId, Args&: ASId, Args&: PtrExpr, |
| 556 | Args&: NeedsFreeze, Args&: IsForked); |
| 557 | return true; |
| 558 | } |
| 559 | |
| 560 | bool RuntimePointerChecking::tryToCreateDiffCheck( |
| 561 | const RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup &CGI, const RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup &CGJ) { |
| 562 | // If either group contains multiple different pointers, bail out. |
| 563 | // TODO: Support multiple pointers by using the minimum or maximum pointer, |
| 564 | // depending on src & sink. |
| 565 | if (CGI.Members.size() != 1 || CGJ.Members.size() != 1) |
| 566 | return false; |
| 567 | |
| 568 | const PointerInfo *Src = &Pointers[CGI.Members[0]]; |
| 569 | const PointerInfo *Sink = &Pointers[CGJ.Members[0]]; |
| 570 | |
| 571 | // If either pointer is read and written, multiple checks may be needed. Bail |
| 572 | // out. |
| 573 | if (!DC.getOrderForAccess(Ptr: Src->PointerValue, IsWrite: !Src->IsWritePtr).empty() || |
| 574 | !DC.getOrderForAccess(Ptr: Sink->PointerValue, IsWrite: !Sink->IsWritePtr).empty()) |
| 575 | return false; |
| 576 | |
| 577 | ArrayRef<unsigned> AccSrc = |
| 578 | DC.getOrderForAccess(Ptr: Src->PointerValue, IsWrite: Src->IsWritePtr); |
| 579 | ArrayRef<unsigned> AccSink = |
| 580 | DC.getOrderForAccess(Ptr: Sink->PointerValue, IsWrite: Sink->IsWritePtr); |
| 581 | // If either pointer is accessed multiple times, there may not be a clear |
| 582 | // src/sink relation. Bail out for now. |
| 583 | if (AccSrc.size() != 1 || AccSink.size() != 1) |
| 584 | return false; |
| 585 | |
| 586 | // If the sink is accessed before src, swap src/sink. |
| 587 | if (AccSink[0] < AccSrc[0]) |
| 588 | std::swap(a&: Src, b&: Sink); |
| 589 | |
| 590 | const SCEVConstant *Step; |
| 591 | const SCEV *SrcStart; |
| 592 | const SCEV *SinkStart; |
| 593 | const Loop *InnerLoop = DC.getInnermostLoop(); |
| 594 | if (!match(S: Src->Expr, |
| 595 | P: m_scev_AffineAddRec(Op0: m_SCEV(V&: SrcStart), Op1: m_SCEVConstant(V&: Step), |
| 596 | L: m_SpecificLoop(L: InnerLoop))) || |
| 597 | !match(S: Sink->Expr, |
| 598 | P: m_scev_AffineAddRec(Op0: m_SCEV(V&: SinkStart), Op1: m_scev_Specific(S: Step), |
| 599 | L: m_SpecificLoop(L: InnerLoop)))) |
| 600 | return false; |
| 601 | |
| 602 | SmallVector<Instruction *, 4> SrcInsts = |
| 603 | DC.getInstructionsForAccess(Ptr: Src->PointerValue, isWrite: Src->IsWritePtr); |
| 604 | SmallVector<Instruction *, 4> SinkInsts = |
| 605 | DC.getInstructionsForAccess(Ptr: Sink->PointerValue, isWrite: Sink->IsWritePtr); |
| 606 | Type *SrcTy = getLoadStoreType(I: SrcInsts[0]); |
| 607 | Type *DstTy = getLoadStoreType(I: SinkInsts[0]); |
| 608 | if (isa<ScalableVectorType>(Val: SrcTy) || isa<ScalableVectorType>(Val: DstTy)) |
| 609 | return false; |
| 610 | |
| 611 | const DataLayout &DL = InnerLoop->getHeader()->getDataLayout(); |
| 612 | unsigned AllocSize = |
| 613 | std::max(a: DL.getTypeAllocSize(Ty: SrcTy), b: DL.getTypeAllocSize(Ty: DstTy)); |
| 614 | |
| 615 | // Only matching constant steps matching the AllocSize are supported at the |
| 616 | // moment. This simplifies the difference computation. Can be extended in the |
| 617 | // future. |
| 618 | if (Step->getAPInt().abs() != AllocSize) |
| 619 | return false; |
| 620 | |
| 621 | // When counting down, the dependence distance needs to be swapped. |
| 622 | if (Step->getValue()->isNegative()) |
| 623 | std::swap(a&: SinkStart, b&: SrcStart); |
| 624 | |
| 625 | const SCEV *SinkStartInt = SE->getPtrToAddrExpr(Op: SinkStart); |
| 626 | const SCEV *SrcStartInt = SE->getPtrToAddrExpr(Op: SrcStart); |
| 627 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: SinkStartInt) || |
| 628 | isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: SrcStartInt)) |
| 629 | return false; |
| 630 | |
| 631 | // If the start values for both Src and Sink also vary according to an outer |
| 632 | // loop, then it's probably better to avoid creating diff checks because |
| 633 | // they may not be hoisted. We should instead let llvm::addRuntimeChecks |
| 634 | // do the expanded full range overlap checks, which can be hoisted. |
| 635 | if (HoistRuntimeChecks && InnerLoop->getParentLoop() && |
| 636 | isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: SinkStartInt) && isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: SrcStartInt)) { |
| 637 | auto *SrcStartAR = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: SrcStartInt); |
| 638 | auto *SinkStartAR = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: SinkStartInt); |
| 639 | const Loop *StartARLoop = SrcStartAR->getLoop(); |
| 640 | if (StartARLoop == SinkStartAR->getLoop() && |
| 641 | StartARLoop == InnerLoop->getParentLoop() && |
| 642 | // If the diff check would already be loop invariant (due to the |
| 643 | // recurrences being the same), then we prefer to keep the diff checks |
| 644 | // because they are cheaper. |
| 645 | SrcStartAR->getStepRecurrence(SE&: *SE) != |
| 646 | SinkStartAR->getStepRecurrence(SE&: *SE)) { |
| 647 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Not creating diff runtime check, since these " |
| 648 | "cannot be hoisted out of the outer loop\n" ); |
| 649 | return false; |
| 650 | } |
| 651 | } |
| 652 | |
| 653 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Creating diff runtime check for:\n" |
| 654 | << "SrcStart: " << *SrcStartInt << '\n' |
| 655 | << "SinkStartInt: " << *SinkStartInt << '\n'); |
| 656 | DiffChecks.emplace_back(Args&: SrcStartInt, Args&: SinkStartInt, Args&: AllocSize, |
| 657 | Args: Src->NeedsFreeze || Sink->NeedsFreeze); |
| 658 | return true; |
| 659 | } |
| 660 | |
| 661 | SmallVector<RuntimePointerCheck, 4> RuntimePointerChecking::generateChecks() { |
| 662 | SmallVector<RuntimePointerCheck, 4> Checks; |
| 663 | |
| 664 | for (unsigned I = 0; I < CheckingGroups.size(); ++I) { |
| 665 | for (unsigned J = I + 1; J < CheckingGroups.size(); ++J) { |
| 666 | const RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup &CGI = CheckingGroups[I]; |
| 667 | const RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup &CGJ = CheckingGroups[J]; |
| 668 | |
| 669 | if (needsChecking(M: CGI, N: CGJ)) { |
| 670 | CanUseDiffCheck = CanUseDiffCheck && tryToCreateDiffCheck(CGI, CGJ); |
| 671 | Checks.emplace_back(Args: &CGI, Args: &CGJ); |
| 672 | } |
| 673 | } |
| 674 | } |
| 675 | return Checks; |
| 676 | } |
| 677 | |
| 678 | void RuntimePointerChecking::generateChecks( |
| 679 | MemoryDepChecker::DepCandidates &DepCands) { |
| 680 | assert(Checks.empty() && "Checks is not empty" ); |
| 681 | groupChecks(DepCands); |
| 682 | mergeStencilGroups(); |
| 683 | Checks = generateChecks(); |
| 684 | } |
| 685 | |
| 686 | bool RuntimePointerChecking::needsChecking( |
| 687 | const RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup &M, const RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup &N) const { |
| 688 | for (const auto &I : M.Members) |
| 689 | for (const auto &J : N.Members) |
| 690 | if (needsChecking(I, J)) |
| 691 | return true; |
| 692 | return false; |
| 693 | } |
| 694 | |
| 695 | /// Compare \p I and \p J and return the minimum. |
| 696 | /// Return nullptr in case we couldn't find an answer. |
| 697 | static const SCEV *getMinFromExprs(const SCEV *I, const SCEV *J, |
| 698 | ScalarEvolution *SE) { |
| 699 | std::optional<APInt> Diff = SE->computeConstantDifference(LHS: J, RHS: I); |
| 700 | if (!Diff) |
| 701 | return nullptr; |
| 702 | return Diff->isNegative() ? J : I; |
| 703 | } |
| 704 | |
| 705 | bool RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup::addPointer( |
| 706 | unsigned Index, const RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck) { |
| 707 | return addPointer( |
| 708 | Index, Start: RtCheck.Pointers[Index].Start, End: RtCheck.Pointers[Index].End, |
| 709 | AS: RtCheck.Pointers[Index].PointerValue->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(), |
| 710 | NeedsFreeze: RtCheck.Pointers[Index].NeedsFreeze, SE&: *RtCheck.SE); |
| 711 | } |
| 712 | |
| 713 | bool RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup::addPointer(unsigned Index, const SCEV *Start, |
| 714 | const SCEV *End, unsigned AS, |
| 715 | bool NeedsFreeze, |
| 716 | ScalarEvolution &SE) { |
| 717 | assert(AddressSpace == AS && |
| 718 | "all pointers in a checking group must be in the same address space" ); |
| 719 | |
| 720 | // Compare the starts and ends with the known minimum and maximum |
| 721 | // of this set. We need to know how we compare against the min/max |
| 722 | // of the set in order to be able to emit memchecks. |
| 723 | const SCEV *Min0 = getMinFromExprs(I: Start, J: Low, SE: &SE); |
| 724 | if (!Min0) |
| 725 | return false; |
| 726 | |
| 727 | const SCEV *Min1 = getMinFromExprs(I: End, J: High, SE: &SE); |
| 728 | if (!Min1) |
| 729 | return false; |
| 730 | |
| 731 | // Update the low bound expression if we've found a new min value. |
| 732 | if (Min0 == Start) |
| 733 | Low = Start; |
| 734 | |
| 735 | // Update the high bound expression if we've found a new max value. |
| 736 | if (Min1 != End) |
| 737 | High = End; |
| 738 | |
| 739 | Members.push_back(Elt: Index); |
| 740 | this->NeedsFreeze |= NeedsFreeze; |
| 741 | return true; |
| 742 | } |
| 743 | |
| 744 | void RuntimePointerChecking::groupChecks( |
| 745 | MemoryDepChecker::DepCandidates &DepCands) { |
| 746 | // We build the groups from dependency candidates equivalence classes |
| 747 | // because: |
| 748 | // - We know that pointers in the same equivalence class share |
| 749 | // the same underlying object and therefore there is a chance |
| 750 | // that we can compare pointers |
| 751 | // - We wouldn't be able to merge two pointers for which we need |
| 752 | // to emit a memcheck. The classes in DepCands are already |
| 753 | // conveniently built such that no two pointers in the same |
| 754 | // class need checking against each other. |
| 755 | |
| 756 | // We use the following (greedy) algorithm to construct the groups |
| 757 | // For every pointer in the equivalence class: |
| 758 | // For each existing group: |
| 759 | // - if the difference between this pointer and the min/max bounds |
| 760 | // of the group is a constant, then make the pointer part of the |
| 761 | // group and update the min/max bounds of that group as required. |
| 762 | |
| 763 | CheckingGroups.clear(); |
| 764 | |
| 765 | // If we need to check two pointers to the same underlying object |
| 766 | // with a non-constant difference, we shouldn't perform any pointer |
| 767 | // grouping with those pointers. This is because we can easily get |
| 768 | // into cases where the resulting check would return false, even when |
| 769 | // the accesses are safe. |
| 770 | // |
| 771 | // The following example shows this: |
| 772 | // for (i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) |
| 773 | // a[5000 + i * m] = a[i] + a[i + 9000] |
| 774 | // |
| 775 | // Here grouping gives a check of (5000, 5000 + 1000 * m) against |
| 776 | // (0, 10000) which is always false. However, if m is 1, there is no |
| 777 | // dependence. Not grouping the checks for a[i] and a[i + 9000] allows |
| 778 | // us to perform an accurate check in this case. |
| 779 | // |
| 780 | // In the above case, we have a non-constant distance and an Unknown |
| 781 | // dependence between accesses to the same underlying object, and could retry |
| 782 | // with runtime checks without dependency information being available. In this |
| 783 | // case we will use the fallback path and create separate checking groups for |
| 784 | // accesses not present in DepCands. |
| 785 | |
| 786 | unsigned TotalComparisons = 0; |
| 787 | |
| 788 | DenseMap<MemoryDepChecker::MemAccessInfo, SmallVector<unsigned>> PositionMap; |
| 789 | for (unsigned Index = 0; Index < Pointers.size(); ++Index) |
| 790 | PositionMap[{Pointers[Index].PointerValue, Pointers[Index].IsWritePtr}] |
| 791 | .push_back(Elt: Index); |
| 792 | |
| 793 | // We need to keep track of what pointers we've already seen so we |
| 794 | // don't process them twice. |
| 795 | SmallSet<unsigned, 2> Seen; |
| 796 | |
| 797 | // Go through all equivalence classes, get the "pointer check groups" |
| 798 | // and add them to the overall solution. We use the order in which accesses |
| 799 | // appear in 'Pointers' to enforce determinism. |
| 800 | for (unsigned I = 0; I < Pointers.size(); ++I) { |
| 801 | // We've seen this pointer before, and therefore already processed |
| 802 | // its equivalence class. |
| 803 | if (Seen.contains(V: I)) |
| 804 | continue; |
| 805 | |
| 806 | MemoryDepChecker::MemAccessInfo Access(Pointers[I].PointerValue, |
| 807 | Pointers[I].IsWritePtr); |
| 808 | |
| 809 | // If there is no entry in the dependency partition, there are no potential |
| 810 | // accesses to merge; simply add a new pointer checking group. |
| 811 | if (!DepCands.contains(V: Access)) { |
| 812 | CheckingGroups.push_back(Elt: RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup(I, *this)); |
| 813 | continue; |
| 814 | } |
| 815 | |
| 816 | SmallVector<RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup, 2> Groups; |
| 817 | |
| 818 | // Because DepCands is constructed by visiting accesses in the order in |
| 819 | // which they appear in alias sets (which is deterministic) and the |
| 820 | // iteration order within an equivalence class member is only dependent on |
| 821 | // the order in which unions and insertions are performed on the |
| 822 | // equivalence class, the iteration order is deterministic. |
| 823 | for (auto M : DepCands.members(V: Access)) { |
| 824 | for (unsigned Pointer : PositionMap.lookup(Val: M)) { |
| 825 | assert(!Seen.contains(Pointer) && "pointer already processed" ); |
| 826 | Seen.insert(V: Pointer); |
| 827 | bool Merged = false; |
| 828 | |
| 829 | // Go through all the existing sets and see if we can find one |
| 830 | // which can include this pointer. |
| 831 | for (RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup &Group : Groups) { |
| 832 | // Don't perform more than a certain amount of comparisons. |
| 833 | // This should limit the cost of grouping the pointers to something |
| 834 | // reasonable. If we do end up hitting this threshold, the algorithm |
| 835 | // will create separate groups for all remaining pointers. |
| 836 | if (TotalComparisons > MemoryCheckMergeThreshold) |
| 837 | break; |
| 838 | |
| 839 | TotalComparisons++; |
| 840 | |
| 841 | if (Group.addPointer(Index: Pointer, RtCheck: *this)) { |
| 842 | Merged = true; |
| 843 | break; |
| 844 | } |
| 845 | } |
| 846 | |
| 847 | if (!Merged) |
| 848 | // We couldn't add this pointer to any existing set or the threshold |
| 849 | // for the number of comparisons has been reached. Create a new group |
| 850 | // to hold the current pointer. |
| 851 | Groups.emplace_back(Args&: Pointer, Args&: *this); |
| 852 | } |
| 853 | } |
| 854 | |
| 855 | // We've computed the grouped checks for this partition. |
| 856 | // Save the results and continue with the next one. |
| 857 | llvm::append_range(C&: CheckingGroups, R&: Groups); |
| 858 | } |
| 859 | } |
| 860 | |
| 861 | /// Result of decomposing a SCEV expression into stencil offset form: |
| 862 | /// Offset = Constant + sum(Coefficients[stride] * stride) |
| 863 | /// where each stride is a loop-invariant SCEV expression. |
| 864 | struct StencilDecomposition { |
| 865 | int64_t Constant = 0; |
| 866 | /// Map from loop-invariant stride SCEV to its integer coefficient. |
| 867 | SmallMapVector<const SCEV *, int64_t, 4> Coefficients; |
| 868 | }; |
| 869 | |
| 870 | /// Recursion cap for addScaledStencilTerm. Depth counts how deep a term |
| 871 | /// sits inside the offset expression. For example, the offset |
| 872 | /// 8 + (64 * (s1 + s2 + (4 * s3))) |
| 873 | /// is visited like this: |
| 874 | /// depth 0: the whole add |
| 875 | /// depth 1: its operands 8 and (64 * (s1 + s2 + (4 * s3))) |
| 876 | /// depth 2: (s1 + s2 + (4 * s3)), the operand of the multiply |
| 877 | /// depth 3: s1, s2 and (4 * s3), the operands of that add |
| 878 | /// At depth 3 addScaledStencilTerm stops going deeper. s1 and s2 are plain |
| 879 | /// strides anyway. (4 * s3) is not split into 4 times s3: it becomes one |
| 880 | /// stride key as it is, with coefficient 64. The result is Constant = 8 |
| 881 | /// and coefficients {s1: 64, s2: 64, (4 * s3): 64}. |
| 882 | /// Three levels cover the stencil offsets we care about: a top-level add, |
| 883 | /// a constant times a sum inside it, and the strides in that sum. A deeper |
| 884 | /// term is kept whole as one stride key. The merge does not care what is |
| 885 | /// inside a key. It only needs a loop-invariant value with a |
| 886 | /// positive-stride predicate, and a whole term has both. The only cost is |
| 887 | /// precision, when another member uses a part of that term, here s3 alone, |
| 888 | /// as a key of its own. isNeverAbove sees two unrelated keys, so a member |
| 889 | /// that is in fact always lower or higher may stay a candidate. |
| 890 | constexpr unsigned MaxStencilDecomposeDepth = 3; |
| 891 | |
| 892 | /// Add one term of a stencil offset to \p D. \p Mult is the factor in |
| 893 | /// front of the term; the top-level call passes 1. |
| 894 | /// Example: the offset 8 + (-64 * (s1 + s2)) + (-32 * s1), Mult = 1. It is |
| 895 | /// an add, so each operand is visited in turn with the same Mult = 1: |
| 896 | /// 8 a constant: D.Constant += 1 * 8 |
| 897 | /// (-64 * (s1 + s2)) a constant times X: visit X = (s1 + s2) with |
| 898 | /// Mult = 1 * -64. X is an add, so each operand is |
| 899 | /// visited with Mult = -64: |
| 900 | /// s1 a stride: D.Coefficients[s1] += -64 |
| 901 | /// s2 a stride: D.Coefficients[s2] += -64 |
| 902 | /// (-32 * s1) a constant times X: visit X = s1 with Mult = -32: |
| 903 | /// s1 a stride: D.Coefficients[s1] += -32 |
| 904 | /// Result: Constant = 8, Coefficients {s1: -96, s2: -64}. The -64 and the |
| 905 | /// -32 for s1 come from two different terms and add up in the map. |
| 906 | /// So, by the kind of term: |
| 907 | /// constant K D.Constant += Mult * K |
| 908 | /// (K * X) visit X with Mult * K |
| 909 | /// (a + b + ...) visit a, b, ... each with this same Mult |
| 910 | /// anything else a stride key: D.Coefficients[Term] += Mult |
| 911 | /// The two recursive cases only fire while Depth is below |
| 912 | /// MaxStencilDecomposeDepth. At the cap, (K * X) and (a + b + ...) are |
| 913 | /// stride keys like anything else; that is not a bailout. |
| 914 | /// Returns false when a constant does not fit in int64_t or an update |
| 915 | /// overflows. The caller then drops the whole decomposition. |
| 916 | static bool addScaledStencilTerm(const SCEV *Term, int64_t Mult, unsigned Depth, |
| 917 | StencilDecomposition &D) { |
| 918 | const SCEVConstant *C; |
| 919 | // A constant folds into the running constant at any depth. |
| 920 | if (match(S: Term, P: m_SCEVConstant(V&: C))) { |
| 921 | std::optional<int64_t> V = C->getAPInt().trySExtValue(); |
| 922 | int64_t Scaled; |
| 923 | return V && !MulOverflow(X: Mult, Y: *V, Result&: Scaled) && |
| 924 | !AddOverflow(X: D.Constant, Y: Scaled, Result&: D.Constant); |
| 925 | } |
| 926 | |
| 927 | if (Depth < MaxStencilDecomposeDepth) { |
| 928 | const SCEV *Inner; |
| 929 | if (match(S: Term, P: m_scev_Mul(Op0: m_SCEVConstant(V&: C), Op1: m_SCEV(V&: Inner)))) { |
| 930 | std::optional<int64_t> V = C->getAPInt().trySExtValue(); |
| 931 | int64_t NewMult; |
| 932 | return V && !MulOverflow(X: Mult, Y: *V, Result&: NewMult) && |
| 933 | addScaledStencilTerm(Term: Inner, Mult: NewMult, Depth: Depth + 1, D); |
| 934 | } |
| 935 | if (auto *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Val: Term)) |
| 936 | return all_of(Range: Add->operands(), P: [&](const SCEV *Op) { |
| 937 | return addScaledStencilTerm(Term: Op, Mult, Depth: Depth + 1, D); |
| 938 | }); |
| 939 | } |
| 940 | |
| 941 | // Anything else is one stride key. |
| 942 | int64_t &Coeff = D.Coefficients[Term]; |
| 943 | return !AddOverflow(X: Coeff, Y: Mult, Result&: Coeff); |
| 944 | } |
| 945 | |
| 946 | /// Try to decompose \p Expr into a stencil offset function of loop-invariant |
| 947 | /// strides: C + a1*s1 + a2*s2 + ... |
| 948 | /// \p Expr is the difference of two access "Start" SCEVs (Start_member - |
| 949 | /// Start_base). A "Start" is the low bound of a memory access range as computed |
| 950 | /// by getStartAndEndForAccess: the address of the first byte the access can |
| 951 | /// touch. The result describes where one member's range sits relative to the |
| 952 | /// base member's range. |
| 953 | /// Constant factors are distributed over sums. SCEV can keep a factored form: |
| 954 | /// -64*s1 + -64*s2 is stored as (-64 * (s1 + s2)). Distributing the -64 gives |
| 955 | /// the coefficients {s1: -64, s2: -64}, so every member of a group is keyed |
| 956 | /// on the same base strides. |
| 957 | /// Relies on SCEV's canonical form: AddExpr operands are flattened (N-ary), |
| 958 | /// MulExpr has the constant operand first when present. |
| 959 | /// Returns std::nullopt if a constant, multiplier, or coefficient update does |
| 960 | /// not fit in int64_t. |
| 961 | static std::optional<StencilDecomposition> |
| 962 | decomposeStencilOffset(const SCEV *Expr, ScalarEvolution &SE, const Loop &L) { |
| 963 | // A "Start" is always loop-invariant (getStartAndEndForAccess asserts it), so |
| 964 | // the difference Expr passed in by the caller is loop-invariant too, and so |
| 965 | // is every term addScaledStencilTerm visits. |
| 966 | assert(SE.isLoopInvariant(Expr, &L) && "expected a loop-invariant offset" ); |
| 967 | |
| 968 | StencilDecomposition D; |
| 969 | if (!addScaledStencilTerm(Term: Expr, /*Mult=*/1, /*Depth=*/0, D)) |
| 970 | return std::nullopt; |
| 971 | return D; |
| 972 | } |
| 973 | |
| 974 | /// Find a common upper limit M for the positive strides in D. If every stride |
| 975 | /// is between 1 and M, the decomposed offset fits in the signed index type. |
| 976 | /// This lets isNeverAbove compare offsets as ordinary signed integers. |
| 977 | /// |
| 978 | /// Subtract abs(Constant) from SignedMax, then divide the remaining budget by |
| 979 | /// the sum of absolute coefficients: |
| 980 | /// M = (SignedMax - abs(Constant)) / sum(abs(Coefficient)). |
| 981 | /// For example, both 8 + 4*s and 8 - 4*s get M = (SignedMax - 8) / 4. |
| 982 | /// |
| 983 | /// Return nullopt if abs(Constant) exceeds SignedMax or no positive stride |
| 984 | /// fits. Otherwise, if all coefficients are zero, no stride limit is needed; |
| 985 | /// return SignedMax. |
| 986 | static std::optional<APInt> |
| 987 | getStencilStrideUpperLimit(const StencilDecomposition &D, unsigned BitWidth) { |
| 988 | uint64_t SignedMax = maxIntN(N: BitWidth); |
| 989 | uint64_t AbsConstant = AbsoluteValue(X: D.Constant); |
| 990 | if (AbsConstant > SignedMax) |
| 991 | return std::nullopt; |
| 992 | uint64_t Budget = SignedMax - AbsConstant; |
| 993 | uint64_t CoeffSum = 0; |
| 994 | for (const auto &[Stride, Coeff] : D.Coefficients) { |
| 995 | uint64_t AbsCoeff = AbsoluteValue(X: Coeff); |
| 996 | if (AbsCoeff > Budget - CoeffSum) |
| 997 | return std::nullopt; |
| 998 | CoeffSum += AbsCoeff; |
| 999 | } |
| 1000 | return APInt(BitWidth, CoeffSum ? Budget / CoeffSum : SignedMax); |
| 1001 | } |
| 1002 | |
| 1003 | namespace { |
| 1004 | /// The runtime checks the merge needs on each stride. |
| 1005 | /// Example: |
| 1006 | /// s1: {NeedsPositive = true, Max = 1000} means the checks 1 <= s1 <= 1000 |
| 1007 | /// s2: {Max = 50} means the check s2 <= 50 |
| 1008 | /// The lower limit is always 1, so a flag is enough for it. |
| 1009 | /// Several members can each ask for an upper limit on the same stride, but only |
| 1010 | /// the smallest one is kept. |
| 1011 | class StrideLimits { |
| 1012 | struct Limit { |
| 1013 | bool NeedsPositive = false; |
| 1014 | std::optional<APInt> Max; |
| 1015 | }; |
| 1016 | SmallMapVector<const SCEV *, Limit, 4> Limits; |
| 1017 | |
| 1018 | public: |
| 1019 | void requireLowerLimit(const SCEV *Stride) { |
| 1020 | Limits[Stride].NeedsPositive = true; |
| 1021 | } |
| 1022 | |
| 1023 | void requireUpperLimit(const SCEV *Stride, const APInt &Max) { |
| 1024 | std::optional<APInt> &Current = Limits[Stride].Max; |
| 1025 | if (!Current || Max.ult(RHS: *Current)) |
| 1026 | Current = Max; |
| 1027 | } |
| 1028 | |
| 1029 | /// Add every new or more strict check in \p Other to this set. |
| 1030 | void addFrom(const StrideLimits &Other) { |
| 1031 | for (const auto &[Stride, L] : Other.Limits) { |
| 1032 | if (L.NeedsPositive) |
| 1033 | requireLowerLimit(Stride); |
| 1034 | if (L.Max) |
| 1035 | requireUpperLimit(Stride, Max: *L.Max); |
| 1036 | } |
| 1037 | } |
| 1038 | |
| 1039 | /// Count the strides that have no check in \p Committed yet. |
| 1040 | unsigned countNew(const StrideLimits &Committed) const { |
| 1041 | return count_if(Range: Limits, P: [&](const auto &Entry) { |
| 1042 | return !Committed.Limits.contains(Key: Entry.first); |
| 1043 | }); |
| 1044 | } |
| 1045 | |
| 1046 | /// Add the checks to \p PSE as SCEV predicates. |
| 1047 | void addPredicates(PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE) const { |
| 1048 | ScalarEvolution &SE = *PSE.getSE(); |
| 1049 | for (const auto &[Stride, L] : Limits) { |
| 1050 | if (L.NeedsPositive) { |
| 1051 | const SCEV *Zero = SE.getZero(Ty: Stride->getType()); |
| 1052 | PSE.addPredicate( |
| 1053 | Pred: *SE.getComparePredicate(Pred: ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, LHS: Stride, RHS: Zero)); |
| 1054 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Adding positive-stride predicate for " |
| 1055 | << *Stride << "\n" ); |
| 1056 | } |
| 1057 | if (L.Max) { |
| 1058 | PSE.addPredicate(Pred: *SE.getComparePredicate(Pred: ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, LHS: Stride, |
| 1059 | RHS: SE.getConstant(Val: *L.Max))); |
| 1060 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Adding stride upper-limit predicate " |
| 1061 | << *Stride << " <= " << *L.Max << "\n" ); |
| 1062 | } |
| 1063 | } |
| 1064 | } |
| 1065 | }; |
| 1066 | } // namespace |
| 1067 | |
| 1068 | /// Add to \p Limits the checks each stride s of \p D needs: |
| 1069 | /// 1 <= s isNeverAbove assumes every stride is 1 or more. |
| 1070 | /// s <= Max Max is from getStencilStrideUpperLimit. |
| 1071 | /// A check is skipped when SCEV already proves it. |
| 1072 | /// Returns false if getStencilStrideUpperLimit finds no Max, or if SCEV proves |
| 1073 | /// that a check always fails. Example: s = smin(x, -1) can never pass 1 <= s, |
| 1074 | /// so a merge would send every run to the scalar loop. |
| 1075 | static bool collectStrideLimits(const StencilDecomposition &D, |
| 1076 | unsigned BitWidth, ScalarEvolution &SE, |
| 1077 | StrideLimits &Limits) { |
| 1078 | std::optional<APInt> UpperLimit = getStencilStrideUpperLimit(D, BitWidth); |
| 1079 | if (!UpperLimit) |
| 1080 | return false; |
| 1081 | |
| 1082 | const SCEV *Max = SE.getConstant(Val: *UpperLimit); |
| 1083 | for (const auto &[Stride, Coeff] : D.Coefficients) { |
| 1084 | if (SE.isKnownNonPositive(S: Stride) || |
| 1085 | SE.isKnownPredicate(Pred: ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, LHS: Stride, RHS: Max)) |
| 1086 | return false; |
| 1087 | if (!SE.isKnownPositive(S: Stride)) |
| 1088 | Limits.requireLowerLimit(Stride); |
| 1089 | if (!SE.isKnownPredicate(Pred: ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, LHS: Stride, RHS: Max)) |
| 1090 | Limits.requireUpperLimit(Stride, Max: *UpperLimit); |
| 1091 | } |
| 1092 | return true; |
| 1093 | } |
| 1094 | |
| 1095 | /// Return true if offset A is never higher than offset B. |
| 1096 | /// A and B are these sums: |
| 1097 | /// A = A.Constant + CoefA_1 * stride_1 + CoefA_2 * stride_2 + ... |
| 1098 | /// B = B.Constant + CoefB_1 * stride_1 + CoefB_2 * stride_2 + ... |
| 1099 | /// A stride missing from a member's map has coefficient 0. Every stride |
| 1100 | /// is 1 or more: the caller proves or predicates each stride to be positive |
| 1101 | /// and that the whole expression does not overflow. |
| 1102 | /// Example: |
| 1103 | /// A: 0 - 80*s1 |
| 1104 | /// B: -40 - 40*s1 |
| 1105 | /// At s1 = 1 both are -80. For bigger s1, A goes down faster. So A is |
| 1106 | /// never above B. |
| 1107 | /// The rule checks two things: |
| 1108 | /// 1. CoefA_i <= CoefB_i for every stride. So when a stride grows, B - A |
| 1109 | /// grows too, or stays the same. |
| 1110 | /// 2. B - A >= 0 when every stride is 1. That is ACorner <= BCorner, with |
| 1111 | /// ACorner = A.Constant + the sum of all CoefA_i, same for BCorner. |
| 1112 | /// B - A starts at or above zero and never goes down, so B - A >= 0 for |
| 1113 | /// all stride values. |
| 1114 | /// Offsets are signed and addresses are unsigned, but both members read |
| 1115 | /// one object, and an object does not wrap around the address space, so |
| 1116 | /// the smaller offset is the smaller address. |
| 1117 | /// Returns false when ACorner or BCorner overflows int64_t. The caller |
| 1118 | /// then keeps the member, which is the safe side. |
| 1119 | static bool isNeverAbove(const StencilDecomposition &A, |
| 1120 | const StencilDecomposition &B) { |
| 1121 | int64_t ACorner = A.Constant, BCorner = B.Constant; |
| 1122 | for (const auto &[Stride, ACoeff] : A.Coefficients) { |
| 1123 | if (ACoeff > B.Coefficients.lookup(Key: Stride)) |
| 1124 | return false; |
| 1125 | if (AddOverflow(X: ACorner, Y: ACoeff, Result&: ACorner)) |
| 1126 | return false; |
| 1127 | } |
| 1128 | for (const auto &[Stride, BCoeff] : B.Coefficients) { |
| 1129 | if (A.Coefficients.lookup(Key: Stride) > BCoeff) |
| 1130 | return false; |
| 1131 | if (AddOverflow(X: BCorner, Y: BCoeff, Result&: BCorner)) |
| 1132 | return false; |
| 1133 | } |
| 1134 | return ACorner <= BCorner; |
| 1135 | } |
| 1136 | |
| 1137 | /// Find the members that can define the merged bound on one side. |
| 1138 | /// Example for the minimum side (\p ForMin == true), two members: |
| 1139 | /// A: 0 - 80*s1 |
| 1140 | /// B: -40 - 40*s1 |
| 1141 | /// For every s1 >= 1, A sits at or below B, so B can never be the lowest |
| 1142 | /// member: A beats B. The members nobody beats are the candidates. |
| 1143 | /// The maximum side works the same way with the comparison flipped. |
| 1144 | /// When two members have equal offsets, only the first one is kept. |
| 1145 | /// In other words: "beats" is a partial order on the offsets, and the |
| 1146 | /// candidates are its minimal elements. |
| 1147 | /// Returns indices into \p Offsets. |
| 1148 | /// TODO: Worst case compares every pair of members: O(N^2). Fine for real |
| 1149 | /// stencils. |
| 1150 | static SmallVector<unsigned, 4> |
| 1151 | collectCandidateMembers(ArrayRef<StencilDecomposition> Offsets, bool ForMin) { |
| 1152 | // A beats B when A always bounds at least as well as B: for the minimum |
| 1153 | // side A is never above B, for the maximum side A is never below B. |
| 1154 | auto Beats = [&](unsigned A, unsigned B) { |
| 1155 | return ForMin ? isNeverAbove(A: Offsets[A], B: Offsets[B]) |
| 1156 | : isNeverAbove(A: Offsets[B], B: Offsets[A]); |
| 1157 | }; |
| 1158 | // Skipping a beaten member loses nothing: Beats is transitive, so |
| 1159 | // whoever beat it also beats anyone it would have beaten. |
| 1160 | BitVector Beaten(Offsets.size()); |
| 1161 | for (unsigned K = 0; K < Offsets.size(); ++K) { |
| 1162 | if (Beaten.test(Idx: K)) |
| 1163 | continue; |
| 1164 | // Walk J = K + 1 .. N to avoid checking the same pair twice, as |
| 1165 | // (K, J) and again as (J, K). The order in a pair does not matter. |
| 1166 | for (unsigned J = K + 1; J < Offsets.size(); ++J) { |
| 1167 | if (Beaten.test(Idx: J)) |
| 1168 | continue; |
| 1169 | // Checking K first settles ties: on equal offsets K survives. |
| 1170 | if (Beats(K, J)) { |
| 1171 | Beaten.set(J); |
| 1172 | } else if (Beats(J, K)) { |
| 1173 | Beaten.set(K); |
| 1174 | break; |
| 1175 | } |
| 1176 | } |
| 1177 | } |
| 1178 | SmallVector<unsigned, 4> Candidates; |
| 1179 | for (unsigned K = 0; K < Offsets.size(); ++K) |
| 1180 | if (!Beaten.test(Idx: K)) |
| 1181 | Candidates.push_back(Elt: K); |
| 1182 | return Candidates; |
| 1183 | } |
| 1184 | |
| 1185 | /// Local cost model: count the runtime checks required before and after |
| 1186 | /// replacing one DepSet's groups (\p GroupIndices) with the single merged |
| 1187 | /// group. Everything is counted in the same unit, one check, even though a |
| 1188 | /// stride predicate or an extra umin/umax operand is cheaper at runtime |
| 1189 | /// than a full group-pair check. The cheaper items only appear on the |
| 1190 | /// After side, and we merge only when After < Before, so the rounding |
| 1191 | /// always errs toward not merging. |
| 1192 | /// |
| 1193 | /// Before = NumGroups * NumExternalChecks, where NumExternalChecks is the |
| 1194 | /// number of groups outside this DepSet that need a check against it. The |
| 1195 | /// product is exact: needsChecking() looks only at (DependencySetId, |
| 1196 | /// AliasSetId) and at whether a group writes, and all groups in this |
| 1197 | /// DepSet agree on those, so an external group is checked against all of |
| 1198 | /// them or against none. |
| 1199 | /// |
| 1200 | /// After = NumExternalChecks + NewPredicates + NumBoundOperands: |
| 1201 | /// - the merged group keeps the same IDs, so it is checked against exactly |
| 1202 | /// the same external groups; |
| 1203 | /// - one check per stride needing a lower or upper limit, unless an earlier |
| 1204 | /// DepSet already paid for either limit; |
| 1205 | /// - a umin over k members costs k-1 compare+selects, same for the umax. |
| 1206 | /// \p NumBoundOperands is the sum of the two. A single candidate costs |
| 1207 | /// nothing: the bound is that member's own address. |
| 1208 | /// |
| 1209 | /// Returns {ChecksBefore, ChecksAfter}. |
| 1210 | static std::pair<unsigned, unsigned> computeStencilMergeCost( |
| 1211 | const RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck, ArrayRef<unsigned> GroupIndices, |
| 1212 | const StrideLimits &Local, const StrideLimits &Committed, |
| 1213 | unsigned NumBoundOperands) { |
| 1214 | unsigned NumGroups = GroupIndices.size(); |
| 1215 | unsigned NumExternalChecks = |
| 1216 | count_if(Range: RtCheck.CheckingGroups, P: [&](const RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup &G) { |
| 1217 | return any_of(Range&: GroupIndices, P: [&](unsigned GI) { |
| 1218 | return RtCheck.needsChecking(M: RtCheck.CheckingGroups[GI], N: G); |
| 1219 | }); |
| 1220 | }); |
| 1221 | |
| 1222 | unsigned NewPredicates = Local.countNew(Committed); |
| 1223 | |
| 1224 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Cost model: NumGroups=" << NumGroups |
| 1225 | << ", NumExternalChecks=" << NumExternalChecks |
| 1226 | << ", predicates=" << NewPredicates |
| 1227 | << ", bound operands=" << NumBoundOperands << ", checks " |
| 1228 | << NumGroups * NumExternalChecks << "->" |
| 1229 | << NumExternalChecks + NewPredicates + NumBoundOperands |
| 1230 | << "\n" ); |
| 1231 | |
| 1232 | return {NumGroups * NumExternalChecks, |
| 1233 | NumExternalChecks + NewPredicates + NumBoundOperands}; |
| 1234 | } |
| 1235 | |
| 1236 | /// Build the merged stencil group for one DepSet, after the cost model has |
| 1237 | /// decided the merge is profitable. Constructs the bounding group over |
| 1238 | /// \p AllMembers with bounds [\p MergedLow, \p MergedHigh]. Returns the new |
| 1239 | /// group. |
| 1240 | static RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup |
| 1241 | buildMergedStencilGroup(const RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck, |
| 1242 | ArrayRef<unsigned> AllMembers, const SCEV *MergedLow, |
| 1243 | const SCEV *MergedHigh, |
| 1244 | ArrayRef<unsigned> GroupIndices) { |
| 1245 | RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup CandidateGroup(AllMembers[0], RtCheck); |
| 1246 | CandidateGroup.Low = MergedLow; |
| 1247 | CandidateGroup.High = MergedHigh; |
| 1248 | append_range(C&: CandidateGroup.Members, R: drop_begin(RangeOrContainer&: AllMembers)); |
| 1249 | CandidateGroup.NeedsFreeze = any_of(Range&: GroupIndices, P: [&](unsigned GI) { |
| 1250 | return RtCheck.CheckingGroups[GI].NeedsFreeze; |
| 1251 | }); |
| 1252 | return CandidateGroup; |
| 1253 | } |
| 1254 | |
| 1255 | void RuntimePointerChecking::mergeStencilGroups() { |
| 1256 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Attempting stencil group merging on " |
| 1257 | << CheckingGroups.size() << " groups\n" ); |
| 1258 | |
| 1259 | if (CheckingGroups.size() < 2) |
| 1260 | return; |
| 1261 | |
| 1262 | // groupChecks merges two pointers only when their bounds differ by a |
| 1263 | // compile-time constant, because only then it can tell which bound is |
| 1264 | // lower or higher. A stencil kernel reads one object at several |
| 1265 | // loop-invariant offsets, so its bounds differ by expressions like |
| 1266 | // -40 - 40*s1, and every such pointer stays in its own group - often |
| 1267 | // too many checks. Here we merge those groups anyway: what we cannot |
| 1268 | // compare at compile time we compare at runtime, with a umin/umax over |
| 1269 | // the few members that can be lowest or highest. The cost: the merged |
| 1270 | // range also covers the gaps between the members, so the merged check |
| 1271 | // can report a conflict where the per-group checks would not. |
| 1272 | // |
| 1273 | // We only merge ranges for reads that happen on every loop iteration. |
| 1274 | // These reads must stay inside the array; otherwise, the original loop |
| 1275 | // already has undefined behaviour. We choose the merged bounds from |
| 1276 | // these ranges. |
| 1277 | // |
| 1278 | // We use the following algorithm to construct a merged stencil group: |
| 1279 | // - collect checking groups that share both DependencySetId and AliasSetId; |
| 1280 | // - reject groups with writes, predicated accesses, forked pointers, |
| 1281 | // different access ranges, or different recurrence steps; |
| 1282 | // - use one member as the base and decompose each other member's offset |
| 1283 | // from that base as C + sum(Coeff[Stride] * Stride), where Stride is |
| 1284 | // loop-invariant; |
| 1285 | // - keep the members that can hold the lowest or the highest address at |
| 1286 | // runtime (the candidate members), and build the merged bounds as a |
| 1287 | // umin over their Start values and a umax over their End values, |
| 1288 | // adding predicates for strides not already known positive and within |
| 1289 | // their limits; |
| 1290 | // - commit the merge only if the local cost model reduces the number of |
| 1291 | // checks after accounting for any new predicates. |
| 1292 | |
| 1293 | // Stencil merging runs when either: |
| 1294 | // - the flag is set to 'force' (-stencil-runtime-check-merge=force), or |
| 1295 | // - the flag is set to 'auto' (-stencil-runtime-check-merge=auto) AND the |
| 1296 | // current check count exceeds the auto-trigger threshold, which defaults |
| 1297 | // to the vectorizer's own runtime-check cutoff |
| 1298 | // (-vectorize-memory-check-threshold). Above it the vectorizer would |
| 1299 | // otherwise reject the loop for having too many runtime checks. In that |
| 1300 | // case the merge can only improve things: at worst we decline to merge |
| 1301 | // and behave as before. |
| 1302 | if (StencilMerge == StencilMergePolicy::Off) { |
| 1303 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: stencil merge disabled\n" ); |
| 1304 | return; |
| 1305 | } |
| 1306 | |
| 1307 | const Loop &L = *DC.getInnermostLoop(); |
| 1308 | |
| 1309 | // visitPointers expands non-header pointer PHIs before runtime checks are |
| 1310 | // created, so their alternatives are not marked IsForked. An unused |
| 1311 | // alternative may wrap and make the merged bounds miss a real overlap. |
| 1312 | for (BasicBlock *BB : L.blocks()) |
| 1313 | if (BB != L.getHeader()) |
| 1314 | for (PHINode &PN : BB->phis()) |
| 1315 | if (PN.getType()->isPointerTy()) |
| 1316 | return; |
| 1317 | |
| 1318 | // For each checking group this pass decomposes each member's offset into |
| 1319 | // stencil form, keeps the candidate members (the ones that can hold the |
| 1320 | // lowest or highest address at runtime), and builds the merged bounds from |
| 1321 | // their own Start and End values. That extra SCEV work adds up on a loop |
| 1322 | // with very many groups, so bail out above a configurable limit as a |
| 1323 | // safety net against pathological inputs. |
| 1324 | if (CheckingGroups.size() > StencilMergeMaxGroups) { |
| 1325 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 1326 | dbgs() << "LAA: " << CheckingGroups.size() |
| 1327 | << " groups exceeds stencil-merge-max-groups, skipping\n" ); |
| 1328 | return; |
| 1329 | } |
| 1330 | |
| 1331 | if (StencilMerge == StencilMergePolicy::Auto) { |
| 1332 | unsigned TotalChecks = 0; |
| 1333 | for (unsigned I = 0; I < CheckingGroups.size(); ++I) |
| 1334 | for (unsigned J = I + 1; J < CheckingGroups.size(); ++J) |
| 1335 | if (needsChecking(M: CheckingGroups[I], N: CheckingGroups[J])) |
| 1336 | ++TotalChecks; |
| 1337 | |
| 1338 | // Above this many checks the vectorizer gives up on the loop, so that is |
| 1339 | // where merging starts to matter. |
| 1340 | if (TotalChecks <= VectorizerParams::VectorizeMemoryCheckThreshold) { |
| 1341 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: " << TotalChecks |
| 1342 | << " checks <= threshold, skipping stencil merge\n" ); |
| 1343 | return; |
| 1344 | } |
| 1345 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 1346 | dbgs() << "LAA: " << TotalChecks |
| 1347 | << " checks > threshold, proceeding with stencil merge\n" ); |
| 1348 | } else { |
| 1349 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: stencil merge forced via flag\n" ); |
| 1350 | } |
| 1351 | |
| 1352 | // Group CheckingGroups by (DependencySetId, AliasSetId) pair. |
| 1353 | // DependencySetId alone is not unique: it resets per alias set, so |
| 1354 | // pointers in different alias sets can share the same DependencySetId. |
| 1355 | // Use MapVector for deterministic iteration order across platforms. |
| 1356 | using DepAliasKey = std::pair<unsigned, unsigned>; |
| 1357 | MapVector<DepAliasKey, SmallVector<unsigned, 4>> DepSetToGroups; |
| 1358 | for (unsigned I = 0; I < CheckingGroups.size(); ++I) { |
| 1359 | const auto &P = Pointers[CheckingGroups[I].Members[0]]; |
| 1360 | DepSetToGroups[{P.DependencySetId, P.AliasSetId}].push_back(Elt: I); |
| 1361 | } |
| 1362 | |
| 1363 | SmallDenseSet<unsigned, 4> MergedGroupIndices; |
| 1364 | SmallVector<RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup, 2> NewMergedGroups; |
| 1365 | // Stride checks from the accepted DepSets. A later DepSet can lower an |
| 1366 | // upper limit, so the predicates are added only after the last DepSet. |
| 1367 | StrideLimits CommittedStrideLimits; |
| 1368 | |
| 1369 | for (auto &[DepAliasKey, GroupIndices] : DepSetToGroups) { |
| 1370 | [[maybe_unused]] auto [DepId, ASId] = DepAliasKey; |
| 1371 | if (GroupIndices.size() < 2) |
| 1372 | continue; |
| 1373 | |
| 1374 | // Collect all member pointers across these groups. Only merge read-only |
| 1375 | // groups: stencil patterns read an array at multiple offsets and write to a |
| 1376 | // different array (a different DepSet). Mixing reads and writes within a |
| 1377 | // merged group complicates the cost model and doesn't match known stencil |
| 1378 | // patterns, so stop and skip the whole DepSet as soon as we see a write. |
| 1379 | SmallVector<unsigned, 8> AllMembers; |
| 1380 | bool CanMerge = true; |
| 1381 | for (unsigned GI : GroupIndices) { |
| 1382 | ArrayRef<unsigned> Members = CheckingGroups[GI].Members; |
| 1383 | if (any_of(Range&: Members, |
| 1384 | P: [&](unsigned Idx) { return Pointers[Idx].IsWritePtr; })) { |
| 1385 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Skipping DepSet(" << DepId << "," << ASId |
| 1386 | << ") with write access\n" ); |
| 1387 | CanMerge = false; |
| 1388 | break; |
| 1389 | } |
| 1390 | // For a forked pointer, LAA considers both possible addresses, even if |
| 1391 | // the loop only uses one of them. The unused address can be outside the |
| 1392 | // array. Its bounds can underflow or overflow, so merging them can hide |
| 1393 | // an overlap and allow unsafe vectorization. |
| 1394 | if (any_of(Range&: Members, |
| 1395 | P: [&](unsigned Idx) { return Pointers[Idx].IsForked; })) { |
| 1396 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Skipping DepSet(" << DepId << "," << ASId |
| 1397 | << ") with forked pointer\n" ); |
| 1398 | CanMerge = false; |
| 1399 | break; |
| 1400 | } |
| 1401 | append_range(C&: AllMembers, R&: Members); |
| 1402 | } |
| 1403 | if (!CanMerge) |
| 1404 | continue; |
| 1405 | |
| 1406 | // A predicated access does not happen in every iteration. In the skipped |
| 1407 | // iterations its address can be outside the array. Its bounds can |
| 1408 | // underflow or overflow, so merging them can hide an overlap and allow |
| 1409 | // unsafe vectorization. |
| 1410 | // Look at the block of the actual load/store, not of the pointer: a |
| 1411 | // loop-invariant address is computed in the preheader, outside the loop. |
| 1412 | if (any_of(Range&: AllMembers, P: [&](unsigned Idx) { |
| 1413 | const PointerInfo &P = Pointers[Idx]; |
| 1414 | assert(!P.IsWritePtr && "only read members reach this point" ); |
| 1415 | return any_of( |
| 1416 | Range: DC.getInstructionsForAccess(Ptr: P.PointerValue, /*isWrite=*/false), |
| 1417 | P: [&](Instruction *I) { |
| 1418 | return LoopAccessInfo::blockNeedsPredication(BB: I->getParent(), TheLoop: &L, |
| 1419 | DT: DC.getDT()); |
| 1420 | }); |
| 1421 | })) { |
| 1422 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Skipping DepSet(" << DepId << "," << ASId |
| 1423 | << ") with predicated access\n" ); |
| 1424 | continue; |
| 1425 | } |
| 1426 | |
| 1427 | // Use the first member as the reference for decomposition. All offsets |
| 1428 | // are computed relative to BaseLow. BaseHigh is only used to check that |
| 1429 | // every member covers the same range. The merged bounds are built later |
| 1430 | // from the members' own Start and End values. |
| 1431 | unsigned Member0 = AllMembers[0]; |
| 1432 | const SCEV *BaseLow = Pointers[Member0].Start; |
| 1433 | const SCEV *BaseHigh = Pointers[Member0].End; |
| 1434 | |
| 1435 | // Keep stencil decomposition and stride-limit arithmetic within 64 bits. |
| 1436 | // All offsets relative to BaseLow have the same index width. |
| 1437 | if (SE->getTypeSizeInBits(Ty: BaseLow->getType()) > 64) |
| 1438 | continue; |
| 1439 | |
| 1440 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Analyzing DepSet(" << DepId << "," << ASId |
| 1441 | << ") with " << AllMembers.size() |
| 1442 | << " members, base: " << *BaseLow << "\n" ); |
| 1443 | |
| 1444 | auto GetStepForPointer = [&](unsigned Idx) -> const SCEV * { |
| 1445 | if (const auto *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: Pointers[Idx].Expr)) |
| 1446 | if (AR->getLoop() == &L) |
| 1447 | return AR->getStepRecurrence(SE&: *SE); |
| 1448 | return nullptr; |
| 1449 | }; |
| 1450 | |
| 1451 | const SCEV *BaseStep = GetStepForPointer(Member0); |
| 1452 | if (!BaseStep) |
| 1453 | continue; |
| 1454 | |
| 1455 | // Verify all members have the same access range (End - Start). The |
| 1456 | // merged upper bound is a umax over the members' own End values. The |
| 1457 | // same decompositions order both the Start and the End values |
| 1458 | // only when End = Start + Range with one shared Range for every member. |
| 1459 | // That is what this check enforces. |
| 1460 | // Compare each member's range (End - Start) and test Range - BaseRange == |
| 1461 | // 0, rather than Range == BaseRange, so algebraically equal but |
| 1462 | // non-identical SCEVs still match. Bail out if any subtraction produces |
| 1463 | // SCEVCouldNotCompute. |
| 1464 | const SCEV *BaseRange = SE->getMinusSCEV(LHS: BaseHigh, RHS: BaseLow); |
| 1465 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: BaseRange)) { |
| 1466 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Base access range not computable, " |
| 1467 | "skipping DepSet\n" ); |
| 1468 | continue; |
| 1469 | } |
| 1470 | if (any_of(Range: drop_begin(RangeOrContainer&: AllMembers), P: [&](unsigned Idx) { |
| 1471 | const SCEV *Range = |
| 1472 | SE->getMinusSCEV(LHS: Pointers[Idx].End, RHS: Pointers[Idx].Start); |
| 1473 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: Range)) |
| 1474 | return true; |
| 1475 | if (Range == BaseRange) |
| 1476 | return false; |
| 1477 | const SCEV *RangeDiff = SE->getMinusSCEV(LHS: Range, RHS: BaseRange); |
| 1478 | return isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: RangeDiff) || !RangeDiff->isZero(); |
| 1479 | })) { |
| 1480 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 1481 | dbgs() << "LAA: Member with different or not computable access " |
| 1482 | "range, skipping DepSet\n" ); |
| 1483 | continue; |
| 1484 | } |
| 1485 | |
| 1486 | // Require all members to have the same recurrence step. Equal ranges |
| 1487 | // (checked above) are what the merged bounds actually need, and a different |
| 1488 | // step usually means a different range. But ranges can be equal by accident |
| 1489 | // - e.g. an invariant access whose range matches the stride, or a loop with |
| 1490 | // a single iteration. The base member is picked arbitrarily, so together |
| 1491 | // with the BaseStep check above this keeps the decision the same no matter |
| 1492 | // which member comes first: we only merge recurrences with one common step. |
| 1493 | if (any_of(Range: drop_begin(RangeOrContainer&: AllMembers), P: [&](unsigned Idx) { |
| 1494 | return GetStepForPointer(Idx) != BaseStep; |
| 1495 | })) { |
| 1496 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Member with different step, " |
| 1497 | "skipping DepSet\n" ); |
| 1498 | continue; |
| 1499 | } |
| 1500 | // One decomposition per member, in AllMembers order. Each entry holds the |
| 1501 | // member's constant offset and its coefficient for each stride, all |
| 1502 | // relative to BaseLow. |
| 1503 | SmallVector<StencilDecomposition, 8> MemberOffsets; |
| 1504 | MemberOffsets.reserve(N: AllMembers.size()); |
| 1505 | // The base member's offset from itself is zero: Constant 0, no strides. |
| 1506 | MemberOffsets.emplace_back(); |
| 1507 | // Stride checks this DepSet needs if it is merged. |
| 1508 | StrideLimits LocalStrideLimits; |
| 1509 | |
| 1510 | // Decompose one member's offset (relative to BaseLow) and append it to |
| 1511 | // MemberOffsets. Returns false if the offset is not in stencil form (so |
| 1512 | // the whole DepSet is skipped). |
| 1513 | const auto CollectOffset = [&](unsigned Idx) -> bool { |
| 1514 | const SCEV *LowOffset = SE->getMinusSCEV(LHS: Pointers[Idx].Start, RHS: BaseLow); |
| 1515 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: LowOffset)) |
| 1516 | return false; |
| 1517 | auto DLow = decomposeStencilOffset(Expr: LowOffset, SE&: *SE, L); |
| 1518 | if (!DLow) { |
| 1519 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Member " << Idx |
| 1520 | << " NOT decomposable: " << *LowOffset << "\n" ); |
| 1521 | return false; |
| 1522 | } |
| 1523 | if (!collectStrideLimits(D: *DLow, |
| 1524 | BitWidth: SE->getTypeSizeInBits(Ty: LowOffset->getType()), SE&: *SE, |
| 1525 | Limits&: LocalStrideLimits)) |
| 1526 | return false; |
| 1527 | |
| 1528 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Member " << Idx |
| 1529 | << ": Const=" << DLow->Constant |
| 1530 | << ", strides=" << DLow->Coefficients.size() << "\n" ); |
| 1531 | MemberOffsets.push_back(Elt: std::move(*DLow)); |
| 1532 | return true; |
| 1533 | }; |
| 1534 | |
| 1535 | if (!all_of(Range: drop_begin(RangeOrContainer&: AllMembers), P: CollectOffset)) |
| 1536 | continue; |
| 1537 | |
| 1538 | SmallVector<unsigned, 4> MinCandidates = |
| 1539 | collectCandidateMembers(Offsets: MemberOffsets, /*ForMin=*/true); |
| 1540 | SmallVector<unsigned, 4> MaxCandidates = |
| 1541 | collectCandidateMembers(Offsets: MemberOffsets, /*ForMin=*/false); |
| 1542 | assert(!MinCandidates.empty() && !MaxCandidates.empty() && |
| 1543 | "a non-empty member list always has a candidate" ); |
| 1544 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Candidate members: min=" |
| 1545 | << MinCandidates.size() |
| 1546 | << ", max=" << MaxCandidates.size() << " of " |
| 1547 | << MemberOffsets.size() << "\n" ); |
| 1548 | |
| 1549 | // Extra bound operands: one compare-and-select per operand past the first |
| 1550 | // in the merged umin, and the same for the umax. |
| 1551 | unsigned NumBoundOperands = |
| 1552 | (MinCandidates.size() - 1) + (MaxCandidates.size() - 1); |
| 1553 | |
| 1554 | // Local cost model: decide whether replacing this DepSet's groups with the |
| 1555 | // single merged group actually reduces the number of runtime checks. Run |
| 1556 | // it before building the merged bounds: a rejected DepSet then creates no |
| 1557 | // umin/umax expressions that would only be thrown away. |
| 1558 | auto [ChecksBefore, ChecksAfter] = |
| 1559 | computeStencilMergeCost(RtCheck: *this, GroupIndices, Local: LocalStrideLimits, |
| 1560 | Committed: CommittedStrideLimits, NumBoundOperands); |
| 1561 | if (ChecksAfter >= ChecksBefore) { |
| 1562 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Not beneficial, skipping DepSet\n" ); |
| 1563 | continue; |
| 1564 | } |
| 1565 | |
| 1566 | // Build one side of the merged bounds from its candidate members. |
| 1567 | // With one candidate the bound is that member's own Start (or End): the |
| 1568 | // exact value the member's own check used before the merge. With several |
| 1569 | // candidates the bound is a umin (umax) over their Starts (Ends). Either |
| 1570 | // way every value is a real member address, so the merge computes no new |
| 1571 | // address and no new overflow is possible. |
| 1572 | // The umin/umax are on pointers. The expander turns them into the same |
| 1573 | // icmp and select that a plain check uses, so no address conversion is |
| 1574 | // needed. |
| 1575 | const auto BuildBound = [&](ArrayRef<unsigned> Candidates, bool IsLow) { |
| 1576 | SmallVector<SCEVUse, 4> Ops; |
| 1577 | for (unsigned K : Candidates) { |
| 1578 | const PointerInfo &P = Pointers[AllMembers[K]]; |
| 1579 | Ops.push_back(Elt: IsLow ? P.Start : P.End); |
| 1580 | } |
| 1581 | return IsLow ? SE->getUMinExpr(Operands&: Ops) : SE->getUMaxExpr(Operands&: Ops); |
| 1582 | }; |
| 1583 | |
| 1584 | const SCEV *MergedLow = BuildBound(MinCandidates, /*IsLow=*/true); |
| 1585 | const SCEV *MergedHigh = BuildBound(MaxCandidates, /*IsLow=*/false); |
| 1586 | |
| 1587 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Merged bounds: Low=" << *MergedLow |
| 1588 | << ", High=" << *MergedHigh << "\n" ); |
| 1589 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Merging, net saving " |
| 1590 | << ChecksBefore - ChecksAfter << "\n" ); |
| 1591 | |
| 1592 | NewMergedGroups.push_back(Elt: buildMergedStencilGroup( |
| 1593 | RtCheck: *this, AllMembers, MergedLow, MergedHigh, GroupIndices)); |
| 1594 | CommittedStrideLimits.addFrom(Other: LocalStrideLimits); |
| 1595 | MergedGroupIndices.insert(I: GroupIndices.begin(), E: GroupIndices.end()); |
| 1596 | } |
| 1597 | |
| 1598 | CommittedStrideLimits.addPredicates(PSE&: DC.getPSE()); |
| 1599 | |
| 1600 | // Rebuild CheckingGroups if we merged anything. |
| 1601 | if (!NewMergedGroups.empty()) { |
| 1602 | SmallVector<RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup, 2> FinalGroups; |
| 1603 | for (unsigned I = 0; I < CheckingGroups.size(); ++I) |
| 1604 | if (!MergedGroupIndices.contains(V: I)) |
| 1605 | FinalGroups.push_back(Elt: std::move(CheckingGroups[I])); |
| 1606 | FinalGroups.append(in_start: std::make_move_iterator(i: NewMergedGroups.begin()), |
| 1607 | in_end: std::make_move_iterator(i: NewMergedGroups.end())); |
| 1608 | CheckingGroups = std::move(FinalGroups); |
| 1609 | |
| 1610 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: After stencil merging: " << CheckingGroups.size() |
| 1611 | << " groups\n" ); |
| 1612 | } |
| 1613 | } |
| 1614 | |
| 1615 | bool RuntimePointerChecking::arePointersInSamePartition( |
| 1616 | const SmallVectorImpl<int> &PtrToPartition, unsigned PtrIdx1, |
| 1617 | unsigned PtrIdx2) { |
| 1618 | return (PtrToPartition[PtrIdx1] != -1 && |
| 1619 | PtrToPartition[PtrIdx1] == PtrToPartition[PtrIdx2]); |
| 1620 | } |
| 1621 | |
| 1622 | bool RuntimePointerChecking::needsChecking(unsigned I, unsigned J) const { |
| 1623 | const PointerInfo &PointerI = Pointers[I]; |
| 1624 | const PointerInfo &PointerJ = Pointers[J]; |
| 1625 | |
| 1626 | // No need to check if two readonly pointers intersect. |
| 1627 | if (!PointerI.IsWritePtr && !PointerJ.IsWritePtr) |
| 1628 | return false; |
| 1629 | |
| 1630 | // Only need to check pointers between two different dependency sets. |
| 1631 | if (PointerI.DependencySetId == PointerJ.DependencySetId) |
| 1632 | return false; |
| 1633 | |
| 1634 | // Only need to check pointers in the same alias set. |
| 1635 | return PointerI.AliasSetId == PointerJ.AliasSetId; |
| 1636 | } |
| 1637 | |
| 1638 | /// Assign each RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup pointer an index for stable UTC output. |
| 1639 | static DenseMap<const RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup *, unsigned> |
| 1640 | getPtrToIdxMap(ArrayRef<RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup> CheckingGroups) { |
| 1641 | DenseMap<const RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup *, unsigned> PtrIndices; |
| 1642 | for (const auto &[Idx, CG] : enumerate(First&: CheckingGroups)) |
| 1643 | PtrIndices[&CG] = Idx; |
| 1644 | return PtrIndices; |
| 1645 | } |
| 1646 | |
| 1647 | void RuntimePointerChecking::printChecks( |
| 1648 | raw_ostream &OS, const SmallVectorImpl<RuntimePointerCheck> &Checks, |
| 1649 | unsigned Depth) const { |
| 1650 | unsigned N = 0; |
| 1651 | auto PtrIndices = getPtrToIdxMap(CheckingGroups); |
| 1652 | for (const auto &[Check1, Check2] : Checks) { |
| 1653 | const auto &First = Check1->Members, &Second = Check2->Members; |
| 1654 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "Check " << N++ << ":\n" ; |
| 1655 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth + 2) << "Comparing group GRP" << PtrIndices.at(Val: Check1) |
| 1656 | << ":\n" ; |
| 1657 | for (unsigned K : First) |
| 1658 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth + 2) << *Pointers[K].PointerValue << "\n" ; |
| 1659 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth + 2) << "Against group GRP" << PtrIndices.at(Val: Check2) |
| 1660 | << ":\n" ; |
| 1661 | for (unsigned K : Second) |
| 1662 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth + 2) << *Pointers[K].PointerValue << "\n" ; |
| 1663 | } |
| 1664 | } |
| 1665 | |
| 1666 | void RuntimePointerChecking::print(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned Depth) const { |
| 1667 | |
| 1668 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "Run-time memory checks:\n" ; |
| 1669 | printChecks(OS, Checks, Depth); |
| 1670 | |
| 1671 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "Grouped accesses:\n" ; |
| 1672 | auto PtrIndices = getPtrToIdxMap(CheckingGroups); |
| 1673 | for (const auto &CG : CheckingGroups) { |
| 1674 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth + 2) << "Group GRP" << PtrIndices.at(Val: &CG) << ":\n" ; |
| 1675 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth + 4) << "(Low: " << *CG.Low << " High: " << *CG.High |
| 1676 | << ")\n" ; |
| 1677 | for (unsigned Member : CG.Members) { |
| 1678 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth + 6) << "Member: " << *Pointers[Member].Expr << "\n" ; |
| 1679 | } |
| 1680 | } |
| 1681 | } |
| 1682 | |
| 1683 | namespace { |
| 1684 | |
| 1685 | /// Analyses memory accesses in a loop. |
| 1686 | /// |
| 1687 | /// Checks whether run time pointer checks are needed and builds sets for data |
| 1688 | /// dependence checking. |
| 1689 | class AccessAnalysis { |
| 1690 | public: |
| 1691 | using MemAccessInfo = |
| 1692 | PointerIntPair<Value * /* AccessPtr */, 1, bool /* IsWrite */>; |
| 1693 | |
| 1694 | AccessAnalysis(const Loop *TheLoop, AAResults *AA, const LoopInfo *LI, |
| 1695 | DominatorTree &DT, MemoryDepChecker::DepCandidates &DA, |
| 1696 | PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE, |
| 1697 | SmallPtrSetImpl<MDNode *> &LoopAliasScopes) |
| 1698 | : TheLoop(TheLoop), EEA(DT, LI), BAA(*AA, &EEA), AST(BAA), LI(LI), DT(DT), |
| 1699 | DepCands(DA), PSE(PSE), LoopAliasScopes(LoopAliasScopes) { |
| 1700 | // We're analyzing dependences across loop iterations. |
| 1701 | BAA.enableCrossIterationMode(); |
| 1702 | } |
| 1703 | |
| 1704 | /// Register a load and whether it is only read from. |
| 1705 | void addLoad(const MemoryLocation &Loc, Type *AccessTy, bool IsReadOnly) { |
| 1706 | Value *Ptr = const_cast<Value *>(Loc.Ptr); |
| 1707 | AST.add(Loc: adjustLoc(Loc)); |
| 1708 | Accesses[MemAccessInfo(Ptr, false)].insert(X: AccessTy); |
| 1709 | if (IsReadOnly) |
| 1710 | ReadOnlyPtr.insert(Ptr); |
| 1711 | } |
| 1712 | |
| 1713 | /// Register a store. |
| 1714 | void addStore(const MemoryLocation &Loc, Type *AccessTy) { |
| 1715 | Value *Ptr = const_cast<Value *>(Loc.Ptr); |
| 1716 | AST.add(Loc: adjustLoc(Loc)); |
| 1717 | Accesses[MemAccessInfo(Ptr, true)].insert(X: AccessTy); |
| 1718 | } |
| 1719 | |
| 1720 | /// Check if we can emit a run-time no-alias check for \p Access. |
| 1721 | /// |
| 1722 | /// Returns true if we can emit a run-time no alias check for \p Access. |
| 1723 | /// If we can check this access, this also adds it to a dependence set and |
| 1724 | /// adds a run-time to check for it to \p RtCheck. If \p Assume is true, |
| 1725 | /// we will attempt to use additional run-time checks in order to get |
| 1726 | /// the bounds of the pointer. |
| 1727 | bool createCheckForAccess(RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck, |
| 1728 | MemAccessInfo Access, Type *AccessTy, |
| 1729 | const SymbolicStrideMap &Strides, |
| 1730 | DenseMap<Value *, unsigned> &DepSetId, |
| 1731 | Loop *TheLoop, unsigned &RunningDepId, |
| 1732 | unsigned ASId, bool Assume); |
| 1733 | |
| 1734 | /// Check whether we can check the pointers at runtime for |
| 1735 | /// non-intersection. |
| 1736 | /// |
| 1737 | /// Returns true if we need no check or if we do and we can generate them |
| 1738 | /// (i.e. the pointers have computable bounds). A return value of false means |
| 1739 | /// we couldn't analyze and generate runtime checks for all pointers in the |
| 1740 | /// loop, but if \p AllowPartial is set then we will have checks for those |
| 1741 | /// pointers we could analyze. \p DepChecker is used to remove unknown |
| 1742 | /// dependences from DepCands. |
| 1743 | bool canCheckPtrAtRT(RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck, Loop *TheLoop, |
| 1744 | const SymbolicStrideMap &Strides, |
| 1745 | Value *&UncomputablePtr, bool AllowPartial, |
| 1746 | const MemoryDepChecker &DepChecker); |
| 1747 | |
| 1748 | /// Goes over all memory accesses, checks whether a RT check is needed |
| 1749 | /// and builds sets of dependent accesses. |
| 1750 | void buildDependenceSets(); |
| 1751 | |
| 1752 | /// Initial processing of memory accesses determined that we need to |
| 1753 | /// perform dependency checking. |
| 1754 | /// |
| 1755 | /// Note that this can later be cleared if we retry memcheck analysis without |
| 1756 | /// dependency checking (i.e. ShouldRetryWithRuntimeChecks). |
| 1757 | bool isDependencyCheckNeeded() const { return !CheckDeps.empty(); } |
| 1758 | |
| 1759 | /// We decided that no dependence analysis would be used. Reset the state. |
| 1760 | void resetDepChecks(MemoryDepChecker &DepChecker) { |
| 1761 | CheckDeps.clear(); |
| 1762 | DepChecker.clearDependences(); |
| 1763 | } |
| 1764 | |
| 1765 | ArrayRef<MemAccessInfo> getDependenciesToCheck() const { return CheckDeps; } |
| 1766 | |
| 1767 | private: |
| 1768 | using PtrAccessMap = MapVector<MemAccessInfo, SmallSetVector<Type *, 1>>; |
| 1769 | |
| 1770 | /// Adjust the MemoryLocation so that it represents accesses to this |
| 1771 | /// location across all iterations, rather than a single one. |
| 1772 | MemoryLocation adjustLoc(MemoryLocation Loc) const { |
| 1773 | // The accessed location varies within the loop, but remains within the |
| 1774 | // underlying object. |
| 1775 | Loc.Size = LocationSize::beforeOrAfterPointer(); |
| 1776 | Loc.AATags.Scope = adjustAliasScopeList(ScopeList: Loc.AATags.Scope); |
| 1777 | Loc.AATags.NoAlias = adjustAliasScopeList(ScopeList: Loc.AATags.NoAlias); |
| 1778 | return Loc; |
| 1779 | } |
| 1780 | |
| 1781 | /// Drop alias scopes that are only valid within a single loop iteration. |
| 1782 | MDNode *adjustAliasScopeList(MDNode *ScopeList) const { |
| 1783 | if (!ScopeList) |
| 1784 | return nullptr; |
| 1785 | |
| 1786 | // For the sake of simplicity, drop the whole scope list if any scope is |
| 1787 | // iteration-local. |
| 1788 | if (any_of(Range: ScopeList->operands(), P: [&](Metadata *Scope) { |
| 1789 | return LoopAliasScopes.contains(Ptr: cast<MDNode>(Val: Scope)); |
| 1790 | })) |
| 1791 | return nullptr; |
| 1792 | |
| 1793 | return ScopeList; |
| 1794 | } |
| 1795 | |
| 1796 | /// Map of all accesses. Values are the types used to access memory pointed to |
| 1797 | /// by the pointer. |
| 1798 | PtrAccessMap Accesses; |
| 1799 | |
| 1800 | /// The loop being checked. |
| 1801 | const Loop *TheLoop; |
| 1802 | |
| 1803 | /// List of accesses that need a further dependence check. |
| 1804 | SmallVector<MemAccessInfo, 8> CheckDeps; |
| 1805 | |
| 1806 | /// Set of pointers that are read only. |
| 1807 | SmallPtrSet<Value*, 16> ReadOnlyPtr; |
| 1808 | |
| 1809 | /// Capture analysis for BAA. |
| 1810 | EarliestEscapeAnalysis EEA; |
| 1811 | |
| 1812 | /// Batched alias analysis results. |
| 1813 | BatchAAResults BAA; |
| 1814 | |
| 1815 | /// An alias set tracker to partition the access set by underlying object and |
| 1816 | //intrinsic property (such as TBAA metadata). |
| 1817 | AliasSetTracker AST; |
| 1818 | |
| 1819 | /// The LoopInfo of the loop being checked. |
| 1820 | const LoopInfo *LI; |
| 1821 | |
| 1822 | /// The dominator tree of the function. |
| 1823 | DominatorTree &DT; |
| 1824 | |
| 1825 | /// Sets of potentially dependent accesses - members of one set share an |
| 1826 | /// underlying pointer. The set "CheckDeps" identfies which sets really need a |
| 1827 | /// dependence check. |
| 1828 | MemoryDepChecker::DepCandidates &DepCands; |
| 1829 | |
| 1830 | /// Initial processing of memory accesses determined that we may need |
| 1831 | /// to add memchecks. Perform the analysis to determine the necessary checks. |
| 1832 | /// |
| 1833 | /// Note that, this is different from isDependencyCheckNeeded. When we retry |
| 1834 | /// memcheck analysis without dependency checking |
| 1835 | /// (i.e. ShouldRetryWithRuntimeChecks), isDependencyCheckNeeded is |
| 1836 | /// cleared while this remains set if we have potentially dependent accesses. |
| 1837 | bool IsRTCheckAnalysisNeeded = false; |
| 1838 | |
| 1839 | /// The SCEV predicate containing all the SCEV-related assumptions. |
| 1840 | PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE; |
| 1841 | |
| 1842 | DenseMap<Value *, SmallVector<const Value *, 16>> UnderlyingObjects; |
| 1843 | |
| 1844 | /// Alias scopes that are declared inside the loop, and as such not valid |
| 1845 | /// across iterations. |
| 1846 | SmallPtrSetImpl<MDNode *> &LoopAliasScopes; |
| 1847 | }; |
| 1848 | |
| 1849 | } // end anonymous namespace |
| 1850 | |
| 1851 | std::optional<int64_t> |
| 1852 | llvm::getStrideFromAddRec(const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR, const Loop *Lp, |
| 1853 | Type *AccessTy, Value *Ptr, |
| 1854 | PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE) { |
| 1855 | if (isa<ScalableVectorType>(Val: AccessTy)) { |
| 1856 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Bad stride - Scalable object: " << *AccessTy |
| 1857 | << "\n" ); |
| 1858 | return std::nullopt; |
| 1859 | } |
| 1860 | |
| 1861 | // The access function must stride over the innermost loop. |
| 1862 | if (Lp != AR->getLoop()) { |
| 1863 | LLVM_DEBUG({ |
| 1864 | dbgs() << "LAA: Bad stride - Not striding over innermost loop " ; |
| 1865 | if (Ptr) |
| 1866 | dbgs() << *Ptr << " " ; |
| 1867 | |
| 1868 | dbgs() << "SCEV: " << *AR << "\n" ; |
| 1869 | }); |
| 1870 | return std::nullopt; |
| 1871 | } |
| 1872 | |
| 1873 | // Check the step is constant. |
| 1874 | const SCEV *Step = AR->getStepRecurrence(SE&: *PSE.getSE()); |
| 1875 | |
| 1876 | // Calculate the pointer stride and check if it is constant. |
| 1877 | const APInt *APStepVal; |
| 1878 | if (!match(S: Step, P: m_scev_APInt(C&: APStepVal))) { |
| 1879 | LLVM_DEBUG({ |
| 1880 | dbgs() << "LAA: Bad stride - Not a constant strided " ; |
| 1881 | if (Ptr) |
| 1882 | dbgs() << *Ptr << " " ; |
| 1883 | dbgs() << "SCEV: " << *AR << "\n" ; |
| 1884 | }); |
| 1885 | return std::nullopt; |
| 1886 | } |
| 1887 | |
| 1888 | const auto &DL = Lp->getHeader()->getDataLayout(); |
| 1889 | TypeSize AllocSize = DL.getTypeAllocSize(Ty: AccessTy); |
| 1890 | int64_t Size = AllocSize.getFixedValue(); |
| 1891 | |
| 1892 | // Huge step value - give up. |
| 1893 | std::optional<int64_t> StepVal = APStepVal->trySExtValue(); |
| 1894 | if (!StepVal) |
| 1895 | return std::nullopt; |
| 1896 | |
| 1897 | // Strided access. |
| 1898 | return *StepVal % Size ? std::nullopt : std::make_optional(t: *StepVal / Size); |
| 1899 | } |
| 1900 | |
| 1901 | /// Check whether \p AR is a non-wrapping AddRec. If \p Ptr is not nullptr, use |
| 1902 | /// information from the IR pointer value to determine no-wrap. If \p Predicates |
| 1903 | /// is not nullptr add no-wrap assumptions if needed. |
| 1904 | static bool |
| 1905 | isNoWrap(PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE, const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR, Value *Ptr, |
| 1906 | Type *AccessTy, const Loop *L, const DominatorTree &DT, |
| 1907 | std::optional<int64_t> Stride = std::nullopt, |
| 1908 | SmallVectorImpl<const SCEVPredicate *> *Predicates = nullptr) { |
| 1909 | // FIXME: This should probably only return true for NUW. |
| 1910 | if (any(Val: AR->getNoWrapFlags())) |
| 1911 | return true; |
| 1912 | |
| 1913 | // An nusw getelementptr that is an AddRec cannot wrap. If it would wrap, |
| 1914 | // the distance between the previously accessed location and the wrapped |
| 1915 | // location will be larger than half the pointer index type space. In that |
| 1916 | // case, the GEP would be poison and any memory access dependent on it would |
| 1917 | // be immediate UB when executed. |
| 1918 | if (auto *GEP = dyn_cast_if_present<GetElementPtrInst>(Val: Ptr); |
| 1919 | GEP && GEP->hasNoUnsignedSignedWrap()) { |
| 1920 | // For the above reasoning to apply, the pointer must be dereferenced in |
| 1921 | // every iteration. |
| 1922 | if (L->getHeader() == L->getLoopLatch() || |
| 1923 | any_of(Range: GEP->users(), P: [L, &DT, GEP](User *U) { |
| 1924 | if (getLoadStorePointerOperand(V: U) != GEP) |
| 1925 | return false; |
| 1926 | BasicBlock *UserBB = cast<Instruction>(Val: U)->getParent(); |
| 1927 | if (!L->contains(BB: UserBB)) |
| 1928 | return false; |
| 1929 | return !LoopAccessInfo::blockNeedsPredication(BB: UserBB, TheLoop: L, DT: &DT); |
| 1930 | })) |
| 1931 | return true; |
| 1932 | } |
| 1933 | |
| 1934 | if (!Stride) |
| 1935 | Stride = getStrideFromAddRec(AR, Lp: L, AccessTy, Ptr, PSE); |
| 1936 | if (Stride) { |
| 1937 | // If the null pointer is undefined, then a access sequence which would |
| 1938 | // otherwise access it can be assumed not to unsigned wrap. Note that this |
| 1939 | // assumes the object in memory is aligned to the natural alignment. |
| 1940 | unsigned AddrSpace = AR->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(); |
| 1941 | if (!NullPointerIsDefined(F: L->getHeader()->getParent(), AS: AddrSpace) && |
| 1942 | (Stride == 1 || Stride == -1)) |
| 1943 | return true; |
| 1944 | } |
| 1945 | |
| 1946 | ScalarEvolution &SE = *PSE.getSE(); |
| 1947 | const SCEVPredicate *WrapPred = |
| 1948 | SE.getWrapPredicate(AR, AddedFlags: SCEVWrapPredicate::IncrementNUSW); |
| 1949 | if (Ptr && Predicates) { |
| 1950 | Predicates->push_back(Elt: WrapPred); |
| 1951 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Pointer may wrap:\n" |
| 1952 | << "LAA: Pointer: " << *Ptr << "\n" |
| 1953 | << "LAA: SCEV: " << *AR << "\n" |
| 1954 | << "LAA: Added an overflow assumption\n" ); |
| 1955 | return true; |
| 1956 | } |
| 1957 | |
| 1958 | // Without adding a new predicate, AR may still be known not to wrap if the |
| 1959 | // predicates of PSE already imply it, e.g. because a wrap predicate for AR |
| 1960 | // was added while analyzing the dependences of the loop. |
| 1961 | return PSE.getPredicate().implies(N: WrapPred, SE); |
| 1962 | } |
| 1963 | |
| 1964 | static void visitPointers(Value *StartPtr, const Loop &InnermostLoop, |
| 1965 | function_ref<void(Value *)> AddPointer) { |
| 1966 | SmallPtrSet<Value *, 8> Visited; |
| 1967 | SmallVector<Value *> WorkList; |
| 1968 | WorkList.push_back(Elt: StartPtr); |
| 1969 | |
| 1970 | while (!WorkList.empty()) { |
| 1971 | Value *Ptr = WorkList.pop_back_val(); |
| 1972 | if (!Visited.insert(Ptr).second) |
| 1973 | continue; |
| 1974 | auto *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(Val: Ptr); |
| 1975 | // SCEV does not look through non-header PHIs inside the loop. Such phis |
| 1976 | // can be analyzed by adding separate accesses for each incoming pointer |
| 1977 | // value. |
| 1978 | if (PN && InnermostLoop.contains(BB: PN->getParent()) && |
| 1979 | PN->getParent() != InnermostLoop.getHeader()) { |
| 1980 | llvm::append_range(C&: WorkList, R: PN->incoming_values()); |
| 1981 | } else |
| 1982 | AddPointer(Ptr); |
| 1983 | } |
| 1984 | } |
| 1985 | |
| 1986 | // Walk back through the IR for a pointer, looking for a select like the |
| 1987 | // following: |
| 1988 | // |
| 1989 | // %offset = select i1 %cmp, i64 %a, i64 %b |
| 1990 | // %addr = getelementptr double, double* %base, i64 %offset |
| 1991 | // %ld = load double, double* %addr, align 8 |
| 1992 | // |
| 1993 | // We won't be able to form a single SCEVAddRecExpr from this since the |
| 1994 | // address for each loop iteration depends on %cmp. We could potentially |
| 1995 | // produce multiple valid SCEVAddRecExprs, though, and check all of them for |
| 1996 | // memory safety/aliasing if needed. |
| 1997 | // |
| 1998 | // If we encounter some IR we don't yet handle, or something obviously fine |
| 1999 | // like a constant, then we just add the SCEV for that term to the list passed |
| 2000 | // in by the caller. If we have a node that may potentially yield a valid |
| 2001 | // SCEVAddRecExpr then we decompose it into parts and build the SCEV terms |
| 2002 | // ourselves before adding to the list. |
| 2003 | static void findForkedSCEVs( |
| 2004 | ScalarEvolution *SE, const Loop *L, Value *Ptr, |
| 2005 | SmallVectorImpl<PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 1, bool>> &ScevList, |
| 2006 | unsigned Depth) { |
| 2007 | // If our Value is a SCEVAddRecExpr, loop invariant, not an instruction, or |
| 2008 | // we've exceeded our limit on recursion, just return whatever we have |
| 2009 | // regardless of whether it can be used for a forked pointer or not, along |
| 2010 | // with an indication of whether it might be a poison or undef value. |
| 2011 | const SCEV *Scev = SE->getSCEV(V: Ptr); |
| 2012 | if (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: Scev) || L->isLoopInvariant(V: Ptr) || |
| 2013 | !isa<Instruction>(Val: Ptr) || Depth == 0) { |
| 2014 | ScevList.emplace_back(Args&: Scev, Args: !isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(V: Ptr)); |
| 2015 | return; |
| 2016 | } |
| 2017 | |
| 2018 | Depth--; |
| 2019 | |
| 2020 | auto UndefPoisonCheck = [](PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 1, bool> S) { |
| 2021 | return get<1>(Pair: S); |
| 2022 | }; |
| 2023 | |
| 2024 | auto GetBinOpExpr = [&SE](unsigned Opcode, const SCEV *L, |
| 2025 | const SCEV *R) -> const SCEV * { |
| 2026 | switch (Opcode) { |
| 2027 | case Instruction::Add: |
| 2028 | return SE->getAddExpr(LHS: L, RHS: R); |
| 2029 | case Instruction::Sub: |
| 2030 | return SE->getMinusSCEV(LHS: L, RHS: R); |
| 2031 | default: |
| 2032 | llvm_unreachable("Unexpected binary operator when walking ForkedPtrs" ); |
| 2033 | } |
| 2034 | }; |
| 2035 | |
| 2036 | Instruction *I = cast<Instruction>(Val: Ptr); |
| 2037 | unsigned Opcode = I->getOpcode(); |
| 2038 | switch (Opcode) { |
| 2039 | case Instruction::GetElementPtr: { |
| 2040 | auto *GEP = cast<GetElementPtrInst>(Val: I); |
| 2041 | Type *SourceTy = GEP->getSourceElementType(); |
| 2042 | // We only handle base + single offset GEPs here for now. |
| 2043 | // Not dealing with preexisting gathers yet, so no vectors. |
| 2044 | if (I->getNumOperands() != 2 || SourceTy->isVectorTy()) { |
| 2045 | ScevList.emplace_back(Args&: Scev, Args: !isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(V: GEP)); |
| 2046 | break; |
| 2047 | } |
| 2048 | SmallVector<PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 1, bool>, 2> BaseScevs; |
| 2049 | SmallVector<PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 1, bool>, 2> OffsetScevs; |
| 2050 | findForkedSCEVs(SE, L, Ptr: I->getOperand(i: 0), ScevList&: BaseScevs, Depth); |
| 2051 | findForkedSCEVs(SE, L, Ptr: I->getOperand(i: 1), ScevList&: OffsetScevs, Depth); |
| 2052 | |
| 2053 | // See if we need to freeze our fork... |
| 2054 | bool NeedsFreeze = any_of(Range&: BaseScevs, P: UndefPoisonCheck) || |
| 2055 | any_of(Range&: OffsetScevs, P: UndefPoisonCheck); |
| 2056 | |
| 2057 | // Check that we only have a single fork, on either the base or the offset. |
| 2058 | // Copy the SCEV across for the one without a fork in order to generate |
| 2059 | // the full SCEV for both sides of the GEP. |
| 2060 | if (OffsetScevs.size() == 2 && BaseScevs.size() == 1) |
| 2061 | BaseScevs.push_back(Elt: BaseScevs[0]); |
| 2062 | else if (BaseScevs.size() == 2 && OffsetScevs.size() == 1) |
| 2063 | OffsetScevs.push_back(Elt: OffsetScevs[0]); |
| 2064 | else { |
| 2065 | ScevList.emplace_back(Args&: Scev, Args&: NeedsFreeze); |
| 2066 | break; |
| 2067 | } |
| 2068 | |
| 2069 | Type *IntPtrTy = SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty: GEP->getPointerOperandType()); |
| 2070 | |
| 2071 | // Find the size of the type being pointed to. We only have a single |
| 2072 | // index term (guarded above) so we don't need to index into arrays or |
| 2073 | // structures, just get the size of the scalar value. |
| 2074 | const SCEV *Size = SE->getSizeOfExpr(IntTy: IntPtrTy, AllocTy: SourceTy); |
| 2075 | |
| 2076 | for (auto [B, O] : zip(t&: BaseScevs, u&: OffsetScevs)) { |
| 2077 | const SCEV *Base = get<0>(Pair: B); |
| 2078 | const SCEV *Offset = get<0>(Pair: O); |
| 2079 | |
| 2080 | // Scale up the offsets by the size of the type, then add to the bases. |
| 2081 | const SCEV *Scaled = |
| 2082 | SE->getMulExpr(LHS: Size, RHS: SE->getTruncateOrSignExtend(V: Offset, Ty: IntPtrTy)); |
| 2083 | ScevList.emplace_back(Args: SE->getAddExpr(LHS: Base, RHS: Scaled), Args&: NeedsFreeze); |
| 2084 | } |
| 2085 | break; |
| 2086 | } |
| 2087 | case Instruction::Select: { |
| 2088 | SmallVector<PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 1, bool>, 2> ChildScevs; |
| 2089 | // A select means we've found a forked pointer, but we currently only |
| 2090 | // support a single select per pointer so if there's another behind this |
| 2091 | // then we just bail out and return the generic SCEV. |
| 2092 | findForkedSCEVs(SE, L, Ptr: I->getOperand(i: 1), ScevList&: ChildScevs, Depth); |
| 2093 | findForkedSCEVs(SE, L, Ptr: I->getOperand(i: 2), ScevList&: ChildScevs, Depth); |
| 2094 | if (ChildScevs.size() == 2) |
| 2095 | append_range(C&: ScevList, R&: ChildScevs); |
| 2096 | else |
| 2097 | ScevList.emplace_back(Args&: Scev, Args: !isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(V: Ptr)); |
| 2098 | break; |
| 2099 | } |
| 2100 | case Instruction::PHI: { |
| 2101 | SmallVector<PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 1, bool>, 2> ChildScevs; |
| 2102 | // A phi means we've found a forked pointer, but we currently only |
| 2103 | // support a single phi per pointer so if there's another behind this |
| 2104 | // then we just bail out and return the generic SCEV. |
| 2105 | if (I->getNumOperands() == 2) { |
| 2106 | findForkedSCEVs(SE, L, Ptr: I->getOperand(i: 0), ScevList&: ChildScevs, Depth); |
| 2107 | findForkedSCEVs(SE, L, Ptr: I->getOperand(i: 1), ScevList&: ChildScevs, Depth); |
| 2108 | } |
| 2109 | if (ChildScevs.size() == 2) |
| 2110 | append_range(C&: ScevList, R&: ChildScevs); |
| 2111 | else |
| 2112 | ScevList.emplace_back(Args&: Scev, Args: !isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(V: Ptr)); |
| 2113 | break; |
| 2114 | } |
| 2115 | case Instruction::Add: |
| 2116 | case Instruction::Sub: { |
| 2117 | SmallVector<PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 1, bool>> LScevs; |
| 2118 | SmallVector<PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 1, bool>> RScevs; |
| 2119 | findForkedSCEVs(SE, L, Ptr: I->getOperand(i: 0), ScevList&: LScevs, Depth); |
| 2120 | findForkedSCEVs(SE, L, Ptr: I->getOperand(i: 1), ScevList&: RScevs, Depth); |
| 2121 | |
| 2122 | // See if we need to freeze our fork... |
| 2123 | bool NeedsFreeze = |
| 2124 | any_of(Range&: LScevs, P: UndefPoisonCheck) || any_of(Range&: RScevs, P: UndefPoisonCheck); |
| 2125 | |
| 2126 | // Check that we only have a single fork, on either the left or right side. |
| 2127 | // Copy the SCEV across for the one without a fork in order to generate |
| 2128 | // the full SCEV for both sides of the BinOp. |
| 2129 | if (LScevs.size() == 2 && RScevs.size() == 1) |
| 2130 | RScevs.push_back(Elt: RScevs[0]); |
| 2131 | else if (RScevs.size() == 2 && LScevs.size() == 1) |
| 2132 | LScevs.push_back(Elt: LScevs[0]); |
| 2133 | else { |
| 2134 | ScevList.emplace_back(Args&: Scev, Args&: NeedsFreeze); |
| 2135 | break; |
| 2136 | } |
| 2137 | |
| 2138 | for (auto [L, R] : zip(t&: LScevs, u&: RScevs)) |
| 2139 | ScevList.emplace_back(Args: GetBinOpExpr(Opcode, get<0>(Pair: L), get<0>(Pair: R)), |
| 2140 | Args&: NeedsFreeze); |
| 2141 | break; |
| 2142 | } |
| 2143 | default: |
| 2144 | // Just return the current SCEV if we haven't handled the instruction yet. |
| 2145 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "ForkedPtr unhandled instruction: " << *I << "\n" ); |
| 2146 | ScevList.emplace_back(Args&: Scev, Args: !isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(V: Ptr)); |
| 2147 | break; |
| 2148 | } |
| 2149 | } |
| 2150 | |
| 2151 | bool AccessAnalysis::createCheckForAccess(RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck, |
| 2152 | MemAccessInfo Access, Type *AccessTy, |
| 2153 | const SymbolicStrideMap &StridesMap, |
| 2154 | DenseMap<Value *, unsigned> &DepSetId, |
| 2155 | Loop *TheLoop, unsigned &RunningDepId, |
| 2156 | unsigned ASId, bool Assume) { |
| 2157 | Value *Ptr = Access.getPointer(); |
| 2158 | ScalarEvolution *SE = PSE.getSE(); |
| 2159 | const DataLayout &DL = TheLoop->getHeader()->getDataLayout(); |
| 2160 | assert(SE->isSCEVable(Ptr->getType()) && "Value is not SCEVable!" ); |
| 2161 | |
| 2162 | SmallVector<PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 1, bool>> RTCheckPtrs; |
| 2163 | findForkedSCEVs(SE, L: TheLoop, Ptr, ScevList&: RTCheckPtrs, Depth: MaxForkedSCEVDepth); |
| 2164 | assert(!RTCheckPtrs.empty() && |
| 2165 | "Must have some runtime-check pointer candidates" ); |
| 2166 | |
| 2167 | // RTCheckPtrs must have size 2 if there are forked pointers. Otherwise, there |
| 2168 | // are no forked pointers; replaceSymbolicStridesSCEV in this case. |
| 2169 | auto IsLoopInvariantOrAR = |
| 2170 | [&SE, &TheLoop](const PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 1, bool> &P) { |
| 2171 | return SE->isLoopInvariant(S: P.getPointer(), L: TheLoop) || |
| 2172 | isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: P.getPointer()); |
| 2173 | }; |
| 2174 | if (RTCheckPtrs.size() == 2 && all_of(Range&: RTCheckPtrs, P: IsLoopInvariantOrAR)) { |
| 2175 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found forked pointer: " << *Ptr << "\n" ; |
| 2176 | for (const auto &[Idx, Q] : enumerate(RTCheckPtrs)) dbgs() |
| 2177 | << "\t(" << Idx << ") " << *Q.getPointer() << "\n" ); |
| 2178 | } else { |
| 2179 | RTCheckPtrs = { |
| 2180 | {replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV(PSE, Lp: TheLoop, PtrToStride: StridesMap, Ptr), false}}; |
| 2181 | } |
| 2182 | |
| 2183 | /// Check whether all pointers can participate in a runtime bounds check. They |
| 2184 | /// must either be invariant or non-wrapping affine AddRecs. |
| 2185 | SmallVector<const SCEVPredicate *> Predicates; |
| 2186 | for (auto &P : RTCheckPtrs) { |
| 2187 | // The bounds for loop-invariant pointer is trivial. |
| 2188 | if (SE->isLoopInvariant(S: P.getPointer(), L: TheLoop)) |
| 2189 | continue; |
| 2190 | |
| 2191 | const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: P.getPointer()); |
| 2192 | if (!AR && Assume) |
| 2193 | AR = PSE.getAsAddRec(V: Ptr, WrapPredsAdded: &Predicates); |
| 2194 | if (!AR || !AR->isAffine()) { |
| 2195 | // Check if bounds for non-affine monotonic expressions can be formed. |
| 2196 | const SCEV *EltSizeSCEV = SE->getStoreSizeOfExpr( |
| 2197 | IntTy: DL.getIndexType(PtrTy: P.getPointer()->getType()), StoreTy: AccessTy); |
| 2198 | if (!Assume || |
| 2199 | !getNonAffineMonotonicBounds(Lp: TheLoop, PtrExpr: P.getPointer(), EltSizeSCEV, SE) |
| 2200 | .first) |
| 2201 | return false; |
| 2202 | continue; |
| 2203 | } |
| 2204 | |
| 2205 | // If there's only one option for Ptr, commit the predicates collected by |
| 2206 | // getAsAddRec and look Ptr up again afterwards: the lookup below reads the |
| 2207 | // assumptions back from PSE, so they need to be committed first. |
| 2208 | if (RTCheckPtrs.size() == 1) { |
| 2209 | PSE.addPredicates(Preds: Predicates); |
| 2210 | Predicates.clear(); |
| 2211 | if (auto *StrideAR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>( |
| 2212 | Val: replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV(PSE, Lp: TheLoop, PtrToStride: StridesMap, Ptr))) |
| 2213 | AR = StrideAR; |
| 2214 | P.setPointer(AR); |
| 2215 | } |
| 2216 | |
| 2217 | if (!isNoWrap(PSE, AR, Ptr: RTCheckPtrs.size() == 1 ? Ptr : nullptr, AccessTy, |
| 2218 | L: TheLoop, DT, /*Stride=*/std::nullopt, |
| 2219 | Predicates: Assume ? &Predicates : nullptr)) |
| 2220 | return false; |
| 2221 | } |
| 2222 | PSE.addPredicates(Preds: Predicates); |
| 2223 | |
| 2224 | // Remember the number of pointers inserted so far, to remove the pointers of |
| 2225 | // this access again if the bounds of any of them cannot be computed, to avoid |
| 2226 | // partial inserts. |
| 2227 | unsigned NumPointers = RtCheck.Pointers.size(); |
| 2228 | for (const auto &[PtrExpr, NeedsFreeze] : RTCheckPtrs) { |
| 2229 | // The id of the dependence set. |
| 2230 | unsigned DepId; |
| 2231 | |
| 2232 | if (DepCands.contains(V: Access)) { |
| 2233 | Value *Leader = DepCands.getLeaderValue(V: Access).getPointer(); |
| 2234 | unsigned &LeaderId = DepSetId[Leader]; |
| 2235 | if (!LeaderId) |
| 2236 | LeaderId = RunningDepId++; |
| 2237 | DepId = LeaderId; |
| 2238 | } else |
| 2239 | // Each access has its own dependence set. |
| 2240 | DepId = RunningDepId++; |
| 2241 | |
| 2242 | bool IsWrite = Access.getInt(); |
| 2243 | if (!RtCheck.insert(Lp: TheLoop, Ptr, PtrExpr, AccessTy, WritePtr: IsWrite, DepSetId: DepId, ASId, |
| 2244 | PSE, NeedsFreeze, |
| 2245 | /*IsForked=*/RTCheckPtrs.size() > 1)) { |
| 2246 | RtCheck.Pointers.truncate(N: NumPointers); |
| 2247 | return false; |
| 2248 | } |
| 2249 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:" << *Ptr << '\n'); |
| 2250 | } |
| 2251 | |
| 2252 | return true; |
| 2253 | } |
| 2254 | |
| 2255 | bool AccessAnalysis::canCheckPtrAtRT(RuntimePointerChecking &RtCheck, |
| 2256 | Loop *TheLoop, |
| 2257 | const SymbolicStrideMap &StridesMap, |
| 2258 | Value *&UncomputablePtr, bool AllowPartial, |
| 2259 | const MemoryDepChecker &DepChecker) { |
| 2260 | // Find pointers with computable bounds. We are going to use this information |
| 2261 | // to place a runtime bound check. |
| 2262 | bool CanDoRT = true; |
| 2263 | |
| 2264 | bool MayNeedRTCheck = false; |
| 2265 | if (!IsRTCheckAnalysisNeeded) return true; |
| 2266 | |
| 2267 | if (auto *Deps = DepChecker.getDependences()) { |
| 2268 | // If there are unknown dependences, this means runtime checks are needed to |
| 2269 | // ensure there's no overlap between accesses to the same underlying object. |
| 2270 | // Remove the equivalence classes containing both source and destination |
| 2271 | // accesses from DepCands. This ensures runtime checks will be generated |
| 2272 | // between those accesses and prevents them from being grouped together. |
| 2273 | for (const auto &Dep : *Deps) { |
| 2274 | if (Dep.Type != MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::Unknown) { |
| 2275 | assert(MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::isSafeForVectorization(Dep.Type) == |
| 2276 | MemoryDepChecker::VectorizationSafetyStatus::Safe && |
| 2277 | "Should only skip safe dependences" ); |
| 2278 | continue; |
| 2279 | } |
| 2280 | Instruction *Src = Dep.getSource(DepChecker); |
| 2281 | Instruction *Dst = Dep.getDestination(DepChecker); |
| 2282 | DepCands.eraseClass(V: {getPointerOperand(V: Src), Src->mayWriteToMemory()}); |
| 2283 | DepCands.eraseClass(V: {getPointerOperand(V: Dst), Dst->mayWriteToMemory()}); |
| 2284 | } |
| 2285 | } else { |
| 2286 | CheckDeps.clear(); |
| 2287 | DepCands = {}; |
| 2288 | } |
| 2289 | |
| 2290 | // We assign a consecutive id to access from different alias sets. |
| 2291 | // Accesses between different groups doesn't need to be checked. |
| 2292 | unsigned ASId = 0; |
| 2293 | for (const auto &AS : AST) { |
| 2294 | int NumReadPtrChecks = 0; |
| 2295 | int NumWritePtrChecks = 0; |
| 2296 | bool CanDoAliasSetRT = true; |
| 2297 | ++ASId; |
| 2298 | auto ASPointers = AS.getPointers(); |
| 2299 | |
| 2300 | // We assign consecutive id to access from different dependence sets. |
| 2301 | // Accesses within the same set don't need a runtime check. |
| 2302 | unsigned RunningDepId = 1; |
| 2303 | DenseMap<Value *, unsigned> DepSetId; |
| 2304 | |
| 2305 | SmallVector<std::pair<MemAccessInfo, Type *>, 4> Retries; |
| 2306 | |
| 2307 | // First, count how many write and read accesses are in the alias set. Also |
| 2308 | // collect MemAccessInfos for later. |
| 2309 | SmallVector<MemAccessInfo, 4> AccessInfos; |
| 2310 | for (const Value *ConstPtr : ASPointers) { |
| 2311 | Value *Ptr = const_cast<Value *>(ConstPtr); |
| 2312 | bool IsWrite = Accesses.contains(Key: MemAccessInfo(Ptr, true)); |
| 2313 | if (IsWrite) |
| 2314 | ++NumWritePtrChecks; |
| 2315 | else |
| 2316 | ++NumReadPtrChecks; |
| 2317 | AccessInfos.emplace_back(Args&: Ptr, Args&: IsWrite); |
| 2318 | } |
| 2319 | |
| 2320 | // We do not need runtime checks for this alias set, if there are no writes |
| 2321 | // or a single write and no reads. |
| 2322 | if (NumWritePtrChecks == 0 || |
| 2323 | (NumWritePtrChecks == 1 && NumReadPtrChecks == 0)) { |
| 2324 | assert((ASPointers.size() <= 1 || |
| 2325 | all_of(ASPointers, |
| 2326 | [this](const Value *Ptr) { |
| 2327 | MemAccessInfo AccessWrite(const_cast<Value *>(Ptr), |
| 2328 | true); |
| 2329 | return !DepCands.contains(AccessWrite); |
| 2330 | })) && |
| 2331 | "Can only skip updating CanDoRT below, if all entries in AS " |
| 2332 | "are reads or there is at most 1 entry" ); |
| 2333 | continue; |
| 2334 | } |
| 2335 | |
| 2336 | const DataLayout &DL = TheLoop->getHeader()->getDataLayout(); |
| 2337 | auto StoreSize = [&DL](Type *Ty) { return DL.getTypeStoreSize(Ty); }; |
| 2338 | |
| 2339 | for (auto &Access : AccessInfos) { |
| 2340 | // A written pointer is only checked via its write access, so its bounds |
| 2341 | // must also cover the types it is loaded with. |
| 2342 | SmallSetVector<Type *, 1> AccessTys = Accesses.lookup(Key: Access); |
| 2343 | if (Access.getInt()) { |
| 2344 | auto ReadIt = Accesses.find(Key: MemAccessInfo(Access.getPointer(), false)); |
| 2345 | if (ReadIt != Accesses.end()) |
| 2346 | AccessTys.insert_range(R&: ReadIt->second); |
| 2347 | } |
| 2348 | |
| 2349 | // The widest fixed and scalable types cover all accesses of their kind. |
| 2350 | for (bool Scalable : {false, true}) { |
| 2351 | auto HasMatchingSizeKind = [&](Type *Ty) { |
| 2352 | return StoreSize(Ty).isScalable() == Scalable; |
| 2353 | }; |
| 2354 | auto Tys = make_filter_range(Range&: AccessTys, Pred: std::ref(t&: HasMatchingSizeKind)); |
| 2355 | if (Tys.empty()) |
| 2356 | continue; |
| 2357 | |
| 2358 | Type *AccessTy = *max_element(Range&: Tys, C: [&](Type *A, Type *B) { |
| 2359 | return TypeSize::isKnownLT(LHS: StoreSize(A), RHS: StoreSize(B)); |
| 2360 | }); |
| 2361 | |
| 2362 | if (!createCheckForAccess(RtCheck, Access, AccessTy, StridesMap, |
| 2363 | DepSetId, TheLoop, RunningDepId, ASId, |
| 2364 | /*Assume=*/false)) { |
| 2365 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Can't find bounds for ptr:" |
| 2366 | << *Access.getPointer() << '\n'); |
| 2367 | Retries.emplace_back(Args&: Access, Args&: AccessTy); |
| 2368 | CanDoAliasSetRT = false; |
| 2369 | } |
| 2370 | } |
| 2371 | } |
| 2372 | |
| 2373 | // Note that this function computes CanDoRT and MayNeedRTCheck |
| 2374 | // independently. For example CanDoRT=false, MayNeedRTCheck=false means that |
| 2375 | // we have a pointer for which we couldn't find the bounds but we don't |
| 2376 | // actually need to emit any checks so it does not matter. |
| 2377 | // |
| 2378 | // We need runtime checks for this alias set, if there are at least 2 |
| 2379 | // dependence sets (in which case RunningDepId > 2) or if we need to re-try |
| 2380 | // any bound checks (because in that case the number of dependence sets is |
| 2381 | // incomplete). |
| 2382 | bool NeedsAliasSetRTCheck = RunningDepId > 2 || !Retries.empty(); |
| 2383 | |
| 2384 | // We need to perform run-time alias checks, but some pointers had bounds |
| 2385 | // that couldn't be checked. |
| 2386 | if (NeedsAliasSetRTCheck && !CanDoAliasSetRT) { |
| 2387 | // Reset the CanDoSetRt flag and retry all accesses that have failed. |
| 2388 | // We know that we need these checks, so we can now be more aggressive |
| 2389 | // and add further checks if required (overflow checks). |
| 2390 | CanDoAliasSetRT = true; |
| 2391 | for (const auto &[Access, AccessTy] : Retries) { |
| 2392 | if (!createCheckForAccess(RtCheck, Access, AccessTy, StridesMap, |
| 2393 | DepSetId, TheLoop, RunningDepId, ASId, |
| 2394 | /*Assume=*/true)) { |
| 2395 | CanDoAliasSetRT = false; |
| 2396 | UncomputablePtr = Access.getPointer(); |
| 2397 | if (!AllowPartial) |
| 2398 | break; |
| 2399 | } |
| 2400 | } |
| 2401 | } |
| 2402 | |
| 2403 | CanDoRT &= CanDoAliasSetRT; |
| 2404 | MayNeedRTCheck |= NeedsAliasSetRTCheck; |
| 2405 | ++ASId; |
| 2406 | } |
| 2407 | |
| 2408 | // If the pointers that we would use for the bounds comparison have different |
| 2409 | // address spaces, assume the values aren't directly comparable, so we can't |
| 2410 | // use them for the runtime check. We also have to assume they could |
| 2411 | // overlap. In the future there should be metadata for whether address spaces |
| 2412 | // are disjoint. |
| 2413 | unsigned NumPointers = RtCheck.Pointers.size(); |
| 2414 | for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumPointers; ++i) { |
| 2415 | for (unsigned j = i + 1; j < NumPointers; ++j) { |
| 2416 | // Only need to check pointers between two different dependency sets. |
| 2417 | if (RtCheck.Pointers[i].DependencySetId == |
| 2418 | RtCheck.Pointers[j].DependencySetId) |
| 2419 | continue; |
| 2420 | // Only need to check pointers in the same alias set. |
| 2421 | if (RtCheck.Pointers[i].AliasSetId != RtCheck.Pointers[j].AliasSetId) |
| 2422 | continue; |
| 2423 | |
| 2424 | Value *PtrI = RtCheck.Pointers[i].PointerValue; |
| 2425 | Value *PtrJ = RtCheck.Pointers[j].PointerValue; |
| 2426 | |
| 2427 | unsigned ASi = PtrI->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(); |
| 2428 | unsigned ASj = PtrJ->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(); |
| 2429 | if (ASi != ASj) { |
| 2430 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 2431 | dbgs() << "LAA: Runtime check would require comparison between" |
| 2432 | " different address spaces\n" ); |
| 2433 | return false; |
| 2434 | } |
| 2435 | } |
| 2436 | } |
| 2437 | |
| 2438 | if (MayNeedRTCheck && (CanDoRT || AllowPartial)) |
| 2439 | RtCheck.generateChecks(DepCands); |
| 2440 | |
| 2441 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: We need to do " << RtCheck.getNumberOfChecks() |
| 2442 | << " pointer comparisons.\n" ); |
| 2443 | |
| 2444 | // If we can do run-time checks, but there are no checks, no runtime checks |
| 2445 | // are needed. This can happen when all pointers point to the same underlying |
| 2446 | // object for example. |
| 2447 | RtCheck.Need = CanDoRT ? RtCheck.getNumberOfChecks() != 0 : MayNeedRTCheck; |
| 2448 | |
| 2449 | bool CanDoRTIfNeeded = !RtCheck.Need || CanDoRT; |
| 2450 | assert(CanDoRTIfNeeded == (CanDoRT || !MayNeedRTCheck) && |
| 2451 | "CanDoRTIfNeeded depends on RtCheck.Need" ); |
| 2452 | if (!CanDoRTIfNeeded && !AllowPartial) |
| 2453 | RtCheck.reset(); |
| 2454 | return CanDoRTIfNeeded; |
| 2455 | } |
| 2456 | |
| 2457 | void AccessAnalysis::buildDependenceSets() { |
| 2458 | // We process the set twice: first we process read-write pointers, last we |
| 2459 | // process read-only pointers. This allows us to skip dependence tests for |
| 2460 | // read-only pointers. |
| 2461 | |
| 2462 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Processing memory accesses...\n" ); |
| 2463 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " AST: " ; AST.dump()); |
| 2464 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Accesses(" << Accesses.size() << "):\n" ); |
| 2465 | LLVM_DEBUG({ |
| 2466 | for (const auto &[A, _] : Accesses) |
| 2467 | dbgs() << "\t" << *A.getPointer() << " (" |
| 2468 | << (A.getInt() |
| 2469 | ? "write" |
| 2470 | : (ReadOnlyPtr.contains(A.getPointer()) ? "read-only" |
| 2471 | : "read" )) |
| 2472 | << ")\n" ; |
| 2473 | }); |
| 2474 | |
| 2475 | // The AliasSetTracker has nicely partitioned our pointers by metadata |
| 2476 | // compatibility and potential for underlying-object overlap. As a result, we |
| 2477 | // only need to check for potential pointer dependencies within each alias |
| 2478 | // set. |
| 2479 | for (const auto &AS : AST) { |
| 2480 | bool AliasSetHasWrite = false; |
| 2481 | |
| 2482 | // Map of (pointer to underlying objects, accessed address space) to last |
| 2483 | // access encountered. |
| 2484 | using UnderlyingObjToAccessMap = |
| 2485 | DenseMap<std::pair<const Value *, unsigned>, MemAccessInfo>; |
| 2486 | UnderlyingObjToAccessMap ObjToLastAccess; |
| 2487 | |
| 2488 | // Set of access to check after all writes have been processed. |
| 2489 | PtrAccessMap DeferredAccesses; |
| 2490 | |
| 2491 | // Iterate over each alias set twice, once to process read/write pointers, |
| 2492 | // and then to process read-only pointers. |
| 2493 | |
| 2494 | auto ProcessAccesses = [&](bool UseDeferred) { |
| 2495 | PtrAccessMap &S = UseDeferred ? DeferredAccesses : Accesses; |
| 2496 | |
| 2497 | // Note that both the alias-set tracker and the alias sets themselves used |
| 2498 | // ordered collections internally and so the iteration order here is |
| 2499 | // deterministic. |
| 2500 | for (const Value *ConstPtr : AS.getPointers()) { |
| 2501 | Value *Ptr = const_cast<Value *>(ConstPtr); |
| 2502 | |
| 2503 | // For a single memory access in AliasSetTracker, Accesses may contain |
| 2504 | // both read and write, and they both need to be handled for CheckDeps. |
| 2505 | for (auto [AccessPtr, IsWrite] : S.keys()) { |
| 2506 | if (AccessPtr != Ptr) |
| 2507 | continue; |
| 2508 | |
| 2509 | // If we're using the deferred access set, then it contains only |
| 2510 | // reads. |
| 2511 | bool IsReadOnlyPtr = ReadOnlyPtr.contains(Ptr) && !IsWrite; |
| 2512 | if (UseDeferred && !IsReadOnlyPtr) |
| 2513 | continue; |
| 2514 | // Otherwise, the pointer must be in the PtrAccessSet, either as a |
| 2515 | // read or a write. |
| 2516 | assert(((IsReadOnlyPtr && UseDeferred) || IsWrite || |
| 2517 | S.contains(MemAccessInfo(Ptr, false))) && |
| 2518 | "Alias-set pointer not in the access set?" ); |
| 2519 | |
| 2520 | MemAccessInfo Access(Ptr, IsWrite); |
| 2521 | DepCands.insert(Data: Access); |
| 2522 | |
| 2523 | // Memorize read-only pointers for later processing and skip them in |
| 2524 | // the first round (they need to be checked after we have seen all |
| 2525 | // write pointers). Note: we also mark pointer that are not |
| 2526 | // consecutive as "read-only" pointers (so that we check |
| 2527 | // "a[b[i]] +="). Hence, we need the second check for "!IsWrite". |
| 2528 | if (!UseDeferred && IsReadOnlyPtr) { |
| 2529 | // We only use the pointer keys, the types vector values don't |
| 2530 | // matter. |
| 2531 | DeferredAccesses.insert(KV: {Access, {}}); |
| 2532 | continue; |
| 2533 | } |
| 2534 | |
| 2535 | // If this is a write - check other reads and writes for conflicts. If |
| 2536 | // this is a read only check other writes for conflicts (but only if |
| 2537 | // there is no other write to the ptr - this is an optimization to |
| 2538 | // catch "a[i] = a[i] + " without having to do a dependence check). |
| 2539 | if ((IsWrite || IsReadOnlyPtr) && AliasSetHasWrite) { |
| 2540 | CheckDeps.push_back(Elt: Access); |
| 2541 | IsRTCheckAnalysisNeeded = true; |
| 2542 | } |
| 2543 | |
| 2544 | if (IsWrite) |
| 2545 | AliasSetHasWrite = true; |
| 2546 | |
| 2547 | // Create sets of pointers connected by a shared alias set and |
| 2548 | // underlying object. |
| 2549 | SmallVector<const Value *, 16> &UOs = UnderlyingObjects[Ptr]; |
| 2550 | UOs = {}; |
| 2551 | ::getUnderlyingObjects(V: Ptr, Objects&: UOs, LI); |
| 2552 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() |
| 2553 | << "Underlying objects for pointer " << *Ptr << "\n" ); |
| 2554 | for (const Value *UnderlyingObj : UOs) { |
| 2555 | // nullptr never alias, don't join sets for pointer that have "null" |
| 2556 | // in their UnderlyingObjects list. |
| 2557 | if (isa<ConstantPointerNull>(Val: UnderlyingObj) && |
| 2558 | !NullPointerIsDefined( |
| 2559 | F: TheLoop->getHeader()->getParent(), |
| 2560 | AS: UnderlyingObj->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace())) |
| 2561 | continue; |
| 2562 | |
| 2563 | auto [It, Inserted] = ObjToLastAccess.try_emplace( |
| 2564 | Key: {UnderlyingObj, |
| 2565 | cast<PointerType>(Val: Ptr->getType())->getAddressSpace()}, |
| 2566 | Args&: Access); |
| 2567 | if (!Inserted) { |
| 2568 | DepCands.unionSets(V1: Access, V2: It->second); |
| 2569 | It->second = Access; |
| 2570 | } |
| 2571 | |
| 2572 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " " << *UnderlyingObj << "\n" ); |
| 2573 | } |
| 2574 | } |
| 2575 | } |
| 2576 | }; |
| 2577 | |
| 2578 | ProcessAccesses(false); |
| 2579 | ProcessAccesses(true); |
| 2580 | } |
| 2581 | } |
| 2582 | |
| 2583 | /// Check whether the access through \p Ptr has a constant stride. |
| 2584 | std::optional<int64_t> |
| 2585 | llvm::getPtrStride(PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE, Type *AccessTy, Value *Ptr, |
| 2586 | const Loop *Lp, const DominatorTree &DT, |
| 2587 | const SymbolicStrideMap &StridesMap, bool ShouldCheckWrap, |
| 2588 | SmallVectorImpl<const SCEVPredicate *> *Predicates) { |
| 2589 | const SCEV *PtrScev = |
| 2590 | replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV(PSE, Lp, PtrToStride: StridesMap, Ptr, Predicates); |
| 2591 | if (PSE.getSE()->isLoopInvariant(S: PtrScev, L: Lp)) |
| 2592 | return 0; |
| 2593 | |
| 2594 | assert(Ptr->getType()->isPointerTy() && "Unexpected non-ptr" ); |
| 2595 | |
| 2596 | const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val: PtrScev); |
| 2597 | if (Predicates && !AR) { |
| 2598 | AR = PSE.getSE()->convertSCEVToAddRecWithPredicates(S: PtrScev, L: Lp, |
| 2599 | Preds&: *Predicates); |
| 2600 | } |
| 2601 | |
| 2602 | if (!AR) { |
| 2603 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Bad stride - Not an AddRecExpr pointer " << *Ptr |
| 2604 | << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n" ); |
| 2605 | return std::nullopt; |
| 2606 | } |
| 2607 | |
| 2608 | std::optional<int64_t> Stride = |
| 2609 | getStrideFromAddRec(AR, Lp, AccessTy, Ptr, PSE); |
| 2610 | if (!ShouldCheckWrap || !Stride) |
| 2611 | return Stride; |
| 2612 | |
| 2613 | if (isNoWrap(PSE, AR, Ptr, AccessTy, L: Lp, DT, Stride, Predicates)) |
| 2614 | return Stride; |
| 2615 | |
| 2616 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 2617 | dbgs() << "LAA: Bad stride - Pointer may wrap in the address space " |
| 2618 | << *Ptr << " SCEV: " << *AR << "\n" ); |
| 2619 | return std::nullopt; |
| 2620 | } |
| 2621 | |
| 2622 | std::optional<int64_t> llvm::getPointersDiff(Type *ElemTyA, Value *PtrA, |
| 2623 | Type *ElemTyB, Value *PtrB, |
| 2624 | const DataLayout &DL, |
| 2625 | ScalarEvolution &SE, |
| 2626 | bool StrictCheck, bool CheckType) { |
| 2627 | assert(PtrA && PtrB && "Expected non-nullptr pointers." ); |
| 2628 | |
| 2629 | // Make sure that A and B are different pointers. |
| 2630 | if (PtrA == PtrB) |
| 2631 | return 0; |
| 2632 | |
| 2633 | // Make sure that the element types are the same if required. |
| 2634 | if (CheckType && ElemTyA != ElemTyB) |
| 2635 | return std::nullopt; |
| 2636 | |
| 2637 | unsigned ASA = PtrA->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(); |
| 2638 | unsigned ASB = PtrB->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(); |
| 2639 | |
| 2640 | // Check that the address spaces match. |
| 2641 | if (ASA != ASB) |
| 2642 | return std::nullopt; |
| 2643 | unsigned IdxWidth = DL.getIndexSizeInBits(AS: ASA); |
| 2644 | |
| 2645 | APInt OffsetA(IdxWidth, 0), OffsetB(IdxWidth, 0); |
| 2646 | const Value *PtrA1 = PtrA->stripAndAccumulateConstantOffsets( |
| 2647 | DL, Offset&: OffsetA, /*AllowNonInbounds=*/true); |
| 2648 | const Value *PtrB1 = PtrB->stripAndAccumulateConstantOffsets( |
| 2649 | DL, Offset&: OffsetB, /*AllowNonInbounds=*/true); |
| 2650 | |
| 2651 | std::optional<int64_t> Val; |
| 2652 | if (PtrA1 == PtrB1) { |
| 2653 | // Retrieve the address space again as pointer stripping now tracks through |
| 2654 | // `addrspacecast`. |
| 2655 | ASA = cast<PointerType>(Val: PtrA1->getType())->getAddressSpace(); |
| 2656 | ASB = cast<PointerType>(Val: PtrB1->getType())->getAddressSpace(); |
| 2657 | // Check that the address spaces match and that the pointers are valid. |
| 2658 | if (ASA != ASB) |
| 2659 | return std::nullopt; |
| 2660 | |
| 2661 | IdxWidth = DL.getIndexSizeInBits(AS: ASA); |
| 2662 | OffsetA = OffsetA.sextOrTrunc(width: IdxWidth); |
| 2663 | OffsetB = OffsetB.sextOrTrunc(width: IdxWidth); |
| 2664 | |
| 2665 | OffsetB -= OffsetA; |
| 2666 | Val = OffsetB.trySExtValue(); |
| 2667 | } else { |
| 2668 | // Otherwise compute the distance with SCEV between the base pointers. |
| 2669 | const SCEV *PtrSCEVA = SE.getSCEV(V: PtrA); |
| 2670 | const SCEV *PtrSCEVB = SE.getSCEV(V: PtrB); |
| 2671 | std::optional<APInt> Diff = |
| 2672 | SE.computeConstantDifference(LHS: PtrSCEVB, RHS: PtrSCEVA); |
| 2673 | if (!Diff) |
| 2674 | return std::nullopt; |
| 2675 | Val = Diff->trySExtValue(); |
| 2676 | } |
| 2677 | |
| 2678 | if (!Val) |
| 2679 | return std::nullopt; |
| 2680 | |
| 2681 | int64_t Size = DL.getTypeStoreSize(Ty: ElemTyA); |
| 2682 | int64_t Dist = *Val / Size; |
| 2683 | |
| 2684 | // Ensure that the calculated distance matches the type-based one after all |
| 2685 | // the bitcasts removal in the provided pointers. |
| 2686 | if (!StrictCheck || Dist * Size == Val) |
| 2687 | return Dist; |
| 2688 | return std::nullopt; |
| 2689 | } |
| 2690 | |
| 2691 | bool llvm::sortPtrAccesses(ArrayRef<Value *> VL, Type *ElemTy, |
| 2692 | const DataLayout &DL, ScalarEvolution &SE, |
| 2693 | SmallVectorImpl<unsigned> &SortedIndices) { |
| 2694 | assert(llvm::all_of( |
| 2695 | VL, [](const Value *V) { return V->getType()->isPointerTy(); }) && |
| 2696 | "Expected list of pointer operands." ); |
| 2697 | // Walk over the pointers, and map each of them to an offset relative to |
| 2698 | // first pointer in the array. |
| 2699 | Value *Ptr0 = VL[0]; |
| 2700 | |
| 2701 | using DistOrdPair = std::pair<int64_t, unsigned>; |
| 2702 | auto Compare = llvm::less_first(); |
| 2703 | std::set<DistOrdPair, decltype(Compare)> Offsets(Compare); |
| 2704 | Offsets.emplace(args: 0, args: 0); |
| 2705 | bool IsConsecutive = true; |
| 2706 | for (auto [Idx, Ptr] : drop_begin(RangeOrContainer: enumerate(First&: VL))) { |
| 2707 | std::optional<int64_t> Diff = |
| 2708 | getPointersDiff(ElemTyA: ElemTy, PtrA: Ptr0, ElemTyB: ElemTy, PtrB: Ptr, DL, SE, |
| 2709 | /*StrictCheck=*/true); |
| 2710 | if (!Diff) |
| 2711 | return false; |
| 2712 | |
| 2713 | // Check if the pointer with the same offset is found. |
| 2714 | int64_t Offset = *Diff; |
| 2715 | auto [It, IsInserted] = Offsets.emplace(args&: Offset, args&: Idx); |
| 2716 | if (!IsInserted) |
| 2717 | return false; |
| 2718 | // Consecutive order if the inserted element is the last one. |
| 2719 | IsConsecutive &= std::next(x: It) == Offsets.end(); |
| 2720 | } |
| 2721 | SortedIndices.clear(); |
| 2722 | if (!IsConsecutive) { |
| 2723 | // Fill SortedIndices array only if it is non-consecutive. |
| 2724 | SortedIndices.resize(N: VL.size()); |
| 2725 | for (auto [Idx, Off] : enumerate(First&: Offsets)) |
| 2726 | SortedIndices[Idx] = Off.second; |
| 2727 | } |
| 2728 | return true; |
| 2729 | } |
| 2730 | |
| 2731 | /// Returns true if the memory operations \p A and \p B are consecutive. |
| 2732 | bool llvm::isConsecutiveAccess(Value *A, Value *B, const DataLayout &DL, |
| 2733 | ScalarEvolution &SE, bool CheckType) { |
| 2734 | Value *PtrA = getLoadStorePointerOperand(V: A); |
| 2735 | Value *PtrB = getLoadStorePointerOperand(V: B); |
| 2736 | if (!PtrA || !PtrB) |
| 2737 | return false; |
| 2738 | Type *ElemTyA = getLoadStoreType(I: A); |
| 2739 | Type *ElemTyB = getLoadStoreType(I: B); |
| 2740 | std::optional<int64_t> Diff = |
| 2741 | getPointersDiff(ElemTyA, PtrA, ElemTyB, PtrB, DL, SE, |
| 2742 | /*StrictCheck=*/true, CheckType); |
| 2743 | return Diff == 1; |
| 2744 | } |
| 2745 | |
| 2746 | void MemoryDepChecker::addAccess(StoreInst *SI) { |
| 2747 | visitPointers(StartPtr: SI->getPointerOperand(), InnermostLoop: *InnermostLoop, |
| 2748 | AddPointer: [this, SI](Value *Ptr) { |
| 2749 | Accesses[MemAccessInfo(Ptr, true)].push_back(x: AccessIdx); |
| 2750 | InstMap.push_back(Elt: SI); |
| 2751 | ++AccessIdx; |
| 2752 | }); |
| 2753 | } |
| 2754 | |
| 2755 | void MemoryDepChecker::addAccess(LoadInst *LI) { |
| 2756 | visitPointers(StartPtr: LI->getPointerOperand(), InnermostLoop: *InnermostLoop, |
| 2757 | AddPointer: [this, LI](Value *Ptr) { |
| 2758 | Accesses[MemAccessInfo(Ptr, false)].push_back(x: AccessIdx); |
| 2759 | InstMap.push_back(Elt: LI); |
| 2760 | ++AccessIdx; |
| 2761 | }); |
| 2762 | } |
| 2763 | |
| 2764 | MemoryDepChecker::VectorizationSafetyStatus |
| 2765 | MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::isSafeForVectorization(DepType Type) { |
| 2766 | switch (Type) { |
| 2767 | case NoDep: |
| 2768 | case Forward: |
| 2769 | case BackwardVectorizable: |
| 2770 | return VectorizationSafetyStatus::Safe; |
| 2771 | |
| 2772 | case Unknown: |
| 2773 | return VectorizationSafetyStatus::PossiblySafeWithRtChecks; |
| 2774 | case ForwardButPreventsForwarding: |
| 2775 | case Backward: |
| 2776 | case BackwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding: |
| 2777 | case IndirectUnsafe: |
| 2778 | case InvariantUnsafe: |
| 2779 | return VectorizationSafetyStatus::Unsafe; |
| 2780 | } |
| 2781 | llvm_unreachable("unexpected DepType!" ); |
| 2782 | } |
| 2783 | |
| 2784 | bool MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::isBackward() const { |
| 2785 | switch (Type) { |
| 2786 | case NoDep: |
| 2787 | case Forward: |
| 2788 | case ForwardButPreventsForwarding: |
| 2789 | case Unknown: |
| 2790 | case IndirectUnsafe: |
| 2791 | case InvariantUnsafe: |
| 2792 | return false; |
| 2793 | |
| 2794 | case BackwardVectorizable: |
| 2795 | case Backward: |
| 2796 | case BackwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding: |
| 2797 | return true; |
| 2798 | } |
| 2799 | llvm_unreachable("unexpected DepType!" ); |
| 2800 | } |
| 2801 | |
| 2802 | bool MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::isPossiblyBackward() const { |
| 2803 | return isBackward() || Type == Unknown || Type == IndirectUnsafe || |
| 2804 | Type == InvariantUnsafe; |
| 2805 | } |
| 2806 | |
| 2807 | bool MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::isForward() const { |
| 2808 | switch (Type) { |
| 2809 | case Forward: |
| 2810 | case ForwardButPreventsForwarding: |
| 2811 | return true; |
| 2812 | |
| 2813 | case NoDep: |
| 2814 | case Unknown: |
| 2815 | case BackwardVectorizable: |
| 2816 | case Backward: |
| 2817 | case BackwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding: |
| 2818 | case IndirectUnsafe: |
| 2819 | case InvariantUnsafe: |
| 2820 | return false; |
| 2821 | } |
| 2822 | llvm_unreachable("unexpected DepType!" ); |
| 2823 | } |
| 2824 | |
| 2825 | bool MemoryDepChecker::couldPreventStoreLoadForward(uint64_t Distance, |
| 2826 | uint64_t TypeByteSize, |
| 2827 | unsigned CommonStride) { |
| 2828 | // If loads occur at a distance that is not a multiple of a feasible vector |
| 2829 | // factor store-load forwarding does not take place. |
| 2830 | // Positive dependences might cause troubles because vectorizing them might |
| 2831 | // prevent store-load forwarding making vectorized code run a lot slower. |
| 2832 | // a[i] = a[i-3] ^ a[i-8]; |
| 2833 | // The stores to a[i:i+1] don't align with the stores to a[i-3:i-2] and |
| 2834 | // hence on your typical architecture store-load forwarding does not take |
| 2835 | // place. Vectorizing in such cases does not make sense. |
| 2836 | // Store-load forwarding distance. |
| 2837 | |
| 2838 | // Maximum vector factor. |
| 2839 | uint64_t MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssuesPowerOf2 = |
| 2840 | std::min(a: VectorizerParams::MaxVectorWidth * TypeByteSize, |
| 2841 | b: MaxStoreLoadForwardSafeDistanceInBits); |
| 2842 | |
| 2843 | // Compute the smallest VF at which the store and load would be misaligned |
| 2844 | // and recent enough to still be in the store buffer. |
| 2845 | for (uint64_t VF = 2 * TypeByteSize; |
| 2846 | VF <= MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssuesPowerOf2; VF *= 2) { |
| 2847 | if (isStoreLoadForwardingConflict(Distance, VectorStoreSize: VF, TypeByteSize, LoadElementSize: VF)) { |
| 2848 | MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssuesPowerOf2 = (VF >> 1); |
| 2849 | break; |
| 2850 | } |
| 2851 | } |
| 2852 | |
| 2853 | if (MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssuesPowerOf2 < 2 * TypeByteSize) { |
| 2854 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 2855 | dbgs() << "LAA: Distance " << Distance |
| 2856 | << " that could cause a store-load forwarding conflict\n" ); |
| 2857 | return true; |
| 2858 | } |
| 2859 | |
| 2860 | if (CommonStride && |
| 2861 | MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssuesPowerOf2 < |
| 2862 | MaxStoreLoadForwardSafeDistanceInBits && |
| 2863 | MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssuesPowerOf2 != |
| 2864 | VectorizerParams::MaxVectorWidth * TypeByteSize) { |
| 2865 | uint64_t MaxVF = |
| 2866 | bit_floor(Value: MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssuesPowerOf2 / CommonStride); |
| 2867 | uint64_t MaxVFInBits = MaxVF * TypeByteSize * 8; |
| 2868 | MaxStoreLoadForwardSafeDistanceInBits = |
| 2869 | std::min(a: MaxStoreLoadForwardSafeDistanceInBits, b: MaxVFInBits); |
| 2870 | |
| 2871 | if (MaxVF < 2) { |
| 2872 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 2873 | dbgs() << "LAA: strided access with Distance " << Distance |
| 2874 | << " that could cause a store-load forwarding conflict\n" ); |
| 2875 | return true; |
| 2876 | } |
| 2877 | } |
| 2878 | return false; |
| 2879 | } |
| 2880 | |
| 2881 | void MemoryDepChecker::mergeInStatus(VectorizationSafetyStatus S) { |
| 2882 | if (Status < S) |
| 2883 | Status = S; |
| 2884 | } |
| 2885 | |
| 2886 | /// Given a dependence-distance \p Dist between two memory accesses, that have |
| 2887 | /// strides in the same direction whose absolute value of the maximum stride is |
| 2888 | /// given in \p MaxStride, in a loop whose maximum backedge taken count is \p |
| 2889 | /// MaxBTC, check if it is possible to prove statically that the dependence |
| 2890 | /// distance is larger than the range that the accesses will travel through the |
| 2891 | /// execution of the loop. If so, return true; false otherwise. This is useful |
| 2892 | /// for example in loops such as the following (PR31098): |
| 2893 | /// |
| 2894 | /// for (i = 0; i < D; ++i) { |
| 2895 | /// = out[i]; |
| 2896 | /// out[i+D] = |
| 2897 | /// } |
| 2898 | static bool isSafeDependenceDistance(ScalarEvolution &SE, const SCEV &MaxBTC, |
| 2899 | const SCEV &Dist, uint64_t MaxStride) { |
| 2900 | |
| 2901 | // If we can prove that |
| 2902 | // (**) |Dist| > MaxBTC * Step |
| 2903 | // where Step is the absolute stride of the memory accesses in bytes, |
| 2904 | // then there is no dependence. |
| 2905 | // |
| 2906 | // Rationale: |
| 2907 | // We basically want to check if the absolute distance (|Dist/Step|) |
| 2908 | // is >= the loop iteration count (or > MaxBTC). |
| 2909 | // This is equivalent to the Strong SIV Test (Practical Dependence Testing, |
| 2910 | // Section 4.2.1); Note, that for vectorization it is sufficient to prove |
| 2911 | // that the dependence distance is >= VF; This is checked elsewhere. |
| 2912 | // But in some cases we can prune dependence distances early, and |
| 2913 | // even before selecting the VF, and without a runtime test, by comparing |
| 2914 | // the distance against the loop iteration count. Since the vectorized code |
| 2915 | // will be executed only if LoopCount >= VF, proving distance >= LoopCount |
| 2916 | // also guarantees that distance >= VF. |
| 2917 | // |
| 2918 | // The dependence distance can be positive/negative, so we sign-extend Dist. |
| 2919 | // MaxBTC is non-negative, so we zero-extended to the wider type before |
| 2920 | // computing MaxBTC * Step. |
| 2921 | // FIXME: The checks below can still wrap if MaxBTC * MaxStride does not fit |
| 2922 | // in WideTy with two bits to spare, e.g. for an unbounded i64 MaxBTC. |
| 2923 | Type *WideTy = SE.getWiderType(Ty1: Dist.getType(), Ty2: MaxBTC.getType()); |
| 2924 | const SCEV *Step = SE.getConstant(Ty: WideTy, V: MaxStride); |
| 2925 | const SCEV *CastedDist = SE.getNoopOrSignExtend(V: &Dist, Ty: WideTy); |
| 2926 | const SCEV *CastedProduct = |
| 2927 | SE.getMulExpr(LHS: SE.getNoopOrZeroExtend(V: &MaxBTC, Ty: WideTy), RHS: Step); |
| 2928 | |
| 2929 | // Is Dist - (MaxBTC * Step) > 0 ? |
| 2930 | // (If so, then we have proven (**) because |Dist| >= Dist) |
| 2931 | const SCEV *Minus = SE.getMinusSCEV(LHS: CastedDist, RHS: CastedProduct); |
| 2932 | if (SE.isKnownPositive(S: Minus)) |
| 2933 | return true; |
| 2934 | |
| 2935 | // Second try: Is -Dist - (MaxBTC * Step) > 0 ? |
| 2936 | // (If so, then we have proven (**) because |Dist| >= -1*Dist) |
| 2937 | const SCEV *NegDist = SE.getNegativeSCEV(V: CastedDist); |
| 2938 | Minus = SE.getMinusSCEV(LHS: NegDist, RHS: CastedProduct); |
| 2939 | return SE.isKnownPositive(S: Minus); |
| 2940 | } |
| 2941 | |
| 2942 | /// Check the dependence for two accesses with the same stride \p Stride. |
| 2943 | /// \p Distance is the positive distance in bytes, and \p TypeByteSize is type |
| 2944 | /// size in bytes. |
| 2945 | /// |
| 2946 | /// \returns true if they are independent. |
| 2947 | static bool areStridedAccessesIndependent(uint64_t Distance, uint64_t Stride, |
| 2948 | uint64_t TypeByteSize) { |
| 2949 | assert(Stride > 1 && "The stride must be greater than 1" ); |
| 2950 | assert(TypeByteSize > 0 && "The type size in byte must be non-zero" ); |
| 2951 | assert(Distance > 0 && "The distance must be non-zero" ); |
| 2952 | |
| 2953 | // Skip if the distance is not multiple of type byte size. |
| 2954 | if (Distance % TypeByteSize) |
| 2955 | return false; |
| 2956 | |
| 2957 | // No dependence if the distance is not multiple of the stride. |
| 2958 | // E.g. |
| 2959 | // for (i = 0; i < 1024 ; i += 4) |
| 2960 | // A[i+2] = A[i] + 1; |
| 2961 | // |
| 2962 | // Two accesses in memory (distance is 2, stride is 4): |
| 2963 | // | A[0] | | | | A[4] | | | | |
| 2964 | // | | | A[2] | | | | A[6] | | |
| 2965 | // |
| 2966 | // E.g. |
| 2967 | // for (i = 0; i < 1024 ; i += 3) |
| 2968 | // A[i+4] = A[i] + 1; |
| 2969 | // |
| 2970 | // Two accesses in memory (distance is 4, stride is 3): |
| 2971 | // | A[0] | | | A[3] | | | A[6] | | | |
| 2972 | // | | | | | A[4] | | | A[7] | | |
| 2973 | return Distance % Stride; |
| 2974 | } |
| 2975 | |
| 2976 | bool MemoryDepChecker::areAccessesCompletelyBeforeOrAfter(const SCEV *Src, |
| 2977 | Type *SrcTy, |
| 2978 | const SCEV *Sink, |
| 2979 | Type *SinkTy) { |
| 2980 | const SCEV *BTC = PSE.getBackedgeTakenCount(); |
| 2981 | const SCEV *SymbolicMaxBTC = PSE.getSymbolicMaxBackedgeTakenCount(); |
| 2982 | ScalarEvolution &SE = *PSE.getSE(); |
| 2983 | const auto &[SrcStart_, SrcEnd_] = |
| 2984 | getStartAndEndForAccess(Lp: InnermostLoop, PtrExpr: Src, AccessTy: SrcTy, BTC, MaxBTC: SymbolicMaxBTC, |
| 2985 | SE: &SE, PointerBounds: &PointerBounds, DT, AC, LoopGuards); |
| 2986 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: SrcStart_) || isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: SrcEnd_)) |
| 2987 | return false; |
| 2988 | |
| 2989 | const auto &[SinkStart_, SinkEnd_] = |
| 2990 | getStartAndEndForAccess(Lp: InnermostLoop, PtrExpr: Sink, AccessTy: SinkTy, BTC, MaxBTC: SymbolicMaxBTC, |
| 2991 | SE: &SE, PointerBounds: &PointerBounds, DT, AC, LoopGuards); |
| 2992 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: SinkStart_) || |
| 2993 | isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: SinkEnd_)) |
| 2994 | return false; |
| 2995 | |
| 2996 | auto SrcEnd = SE.applyLoopGuards(Expr: SrcEnd_, Guards&: LoopGuards); |
| 2997 | auto SinkStart = SE.applyLoopGuards(Expr: SinkStart_, Guards&: LoopGuards); |
| 2998 | if (SE.isKnownPredicate(Pred: CmpInst::ICMP_ULE, LHS: SrcEnd, RHS: SinkStart)) |
| 2999 | return true; |
| 3000 | |
| 3001 | auto SinkEnd = SE.applyLoopGuards(Expr: SinkEnd_, Guards&: LoopGuards); |
| 3002 | auto SrcStart = SE.applyLoopGuards(Expr: SrcStart_, Guards&: LoopGuards); |
| 3003 | return SE.isKnownPredicate(Pred: CmpInst::ICMP_ULE, LHS: SinkEnd, RHS: SrcStart); |
| 3004 | } |
| 3005 | |
| 3006 | std::variant<MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::DepType, |
| 3007 | MemoryDepChecker::DepDistanceStrideAndSizeInfo> |
| 3008 | MemoryDepChecker::getDependenceDistanceStrideAndSize( |
| 3009 | const AccessAnalysis::MemAccessInfo &A, Instruction *AInst, |
| 3010 | const AccessAnalysis::MemAccessInfo &B, Instruction *BInst) { |
| 3011 | const auto &DL = InnermostLoop->getHeader()->getDataLayout(); |
| 3012 | auto &SE = *PSE.getSE(); |
| 3013 | const auto &[APtr, AIsWrite] = A; |
| 3014 | const auto &[BPtr, BIsWrite] = B; |
| 3015 | |
| 3016 | // Two reads are independent. |
| 3017 | if (!AIsWrite && !BIsWrite) |
| 3018 | return MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::NoDep; |
| 3019 | |
| 3020 | Type *ATy = getLoadStoreType(I: AInst); |
| 3021 | Type *BTy = getLoadStoreType(I: BInst); |
| 3022 | |
| 3023 | // We cannot check pointers in different address spaces. |
| 3024 | if (APtr->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace() != |
| 3025 | BPtr->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace()) |
| 3026 | return MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3027 | |
| 3028 | SmallVector<const SCEVPredicate *> Predicates; |
| 3029 | std::optional<int64_t> StrideAPtr = |
| 3030 | getPtrStride(PSE, AccessTy: ATy, Ptr: APtr, Lp: InnermostLoop, DT: *DT, StridesMap: SymbolicStrides, |
| 3031 | /*ShouldCheckWrap=*/true, Predicates: &Predicates); |
| 3032 | std::optional<int64_t> StrideBPtr = |
| 3033 | getPtrStride(PSE, AccessTy: BTy, Ptr: BPtr, Lp: InnermostLoop, DT: *DT, StridesMap: SymbolicStrides, |
| 3034 | /*ShouldCheckWrap=*/true, Predicates: &Predicates); |
| 3035 | PSE.addPredicates(Preds: Predicates); |
| 3036 | |
| 3037 | const SCEV *Src = PSE.getSCEV(V: APtr); |
| 3038 | const SCEV *Sink = PSE.getSCEV(V: BPtr); |
| 3039 | |
| 3040 | // If the induction step is negative we have to invert source and sink of the |
| 3041 | // dependence when measuring the distance between them. We should not swap |
| 3042 | // AIsWrite with BIsWrite, as their uses expect them in program order. |
| 3043 | if (StrideAPtr && *StrideAPtr < 0) { |
| 3044 | std::swap(a&: Src, b&: Sink); |
| 3045 | std::swap(a&: AInst, b&: BInst); |
| 3046 | std::swap(a&: ATy, b&: BTy); |
| 3047 | std::swap(lhs&: StrideAPtr, rhs&: StrideBPtr); |
| 3048 | } |
| 3049 | |
| 3050 | const SCEV *Dist = SE.getMinusSCEV(LHS: Sink, RHS: Src); |
| 3051 | |
| 3052 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Src Scev: " << *Src << "Sink Scev: " << *Sink |
| 3053 | << "\n" ); |
| 3054 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Distance for " << *AInst << " to " << *BInst |
| 3055 | << ": " << *Dist << "\n" ); |
| 3056 | |
| 3057 | // Need accesses with constant strides and the same direction for further |
| 3058 | // dependence analysis. We don't want to vectorize "A[B[i]] += ..." and |
| 3059 | // similar code or pointer arithmetic that could wrap in the address space. |
| 3060 | |
| 3061 | // If either Src or Sink are not strided (i.e. not a non-wrapping AddRec) and |
| 3062 | // not loop-invariant (stride will be 0 in that case), we cannot analyze the |
| 3063 | // dependence further and also cannot generate runtime checks. |
| 3064 | if (!StrideAPtr || !StrideBPtr) { |
| 3065 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Pointer access with non-constant stride\n" ); |
| 3066 | return MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::IndirectUnsafe; |
| 3067 | } |
| 3068 | |
| 3069 | int64_t StrideAPtrInt = *StrideAPtr; |
| 3070 | int64_t StrideBPtrInt = *StrideBPtr; |
| 3071 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Src induction step: " << StrideAPtrInt |
| 3072 | << " Sink induction step: " << StrideBPtrInt << "\n" ); |
| 3073 | // At least Src or Sink are loop invariant and the other is strided or |
| 3074 | // invariant. |
| 3075 | if (!StrideAPtrInt || !StrideBPtrInt) { |
| 3076 | // If both are loop-invariant and access the same location, we cannot |
| 3077 | // vectorize. |
| 3078 | if (!StrideAPtrInt && !StrideBPtrInt && Dist->isZero()) |
| 3079 | return MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::InvariantUnsafe; |
| 3080 | // Otherwise, we can generate a runtime check to disambiguate the accesses. |
| 3081 | return MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3082 | } |
| 3083 | |
| 3084 | // Both Src and Sink have a constant stride, check if they are in the same |
| 3085 | // direction. |
| 3086 | if ((StrideAPtrInt > 0) != (StrideBPtrInt > 0)) { |
| 3087 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 3088 | dbgs() << "Pointer access with strides in different directions\n" ); |
| 3089 | return MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3090 | } |
| 3091 | |
| 3092 | TypeSize AStoreSz = DL.getTypeStoreSize(Ty: ATy); |
| 3093 | TypeSize BStoreSz = DL.getTypeStoreSize(Ty: BTy); |
| 3094 | |
| 3095 | // If store sizes are not the same, set TypeByteSize to zero, so we can check |
| 3096 | // it in the caller isDependent. |
| 3097 | uint64_t ASz = DL.getTypeAllocSize(Ty: ATy); |
| 3098 | uint64_t BSz = DL.getTypeAllocSize(Ty: BTy); |
| 3099 | uint64_t TypeByteSize = (AStoreSz == BStoreSz) ? BSz : 0; |
| 3100 | |
| 3101 | uint64_t StrideAScaled = AbsoluteValue(X: StrideAPtrInt) * ASz; |
| 3102 | uint64_t StrideBScaled = AbsoluteValue(X: StrideBPtrInt) * BSz; |
| 3103 | |
| 3104 | uint64_t MaxStride = std::max(a: StrideAScaled, b: StrideBScaled); |
| 3105 | |
| 3106 | std::optional<uint64_t> CommonStride; |
| 3107 | if (StrideAScaled == StrideBScaled) |
| 3108 | CommonStride = StrideAScaled; |
| 3109 | |
| 3110 | // TODO: Historically, we didn't retry with runtime checks when (unscaled) |
| 3111 | // strides were different but there is no inherent reason to. |
| 3112 | if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(Val: Dist)) |
| 3113 | ShouldRetryWithRuntimeChecks |= StrideAPtrInt == StrideBPtrInt; |
| 3114 | |
| 3115 | // If distance is a SCEVCouldNotCompute, return Unknown immediately. |
| 3116 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: Dist)) { |
| 3117 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Uncomputable distance.\n" ); |
| 3118 | return Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3119 | } |
| 3120 | |
| 3121 | return DepDistanceStrideAndSizeInfo(Dist, MaxStride, CommonStride, |
| 3122 | TypeByteSize, AIsWrite, BIsWrite); |
| 3123 | } |
| 3124 | |
| 3125 | MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::DepType |
| 3126 | MemoryDepChecker::isDependent(const MemAccessInfo &A, unsigned AIdx, |
| 3127 | const MemAccessInfo &B, unsigned BIdx) { |
| 3128 | assert(AIdx < BIdx && "Must pass arguments in program order" ); |
| 3129 | |
| 3130 | // Check if we can prove that Sink only accesses memory after Src's end or |
| 3131 | // vice versa. The helper is used to perform the checks only on the exit paths |
| 3132 | // where it helps to improve the analysis result. |
| 3133 | auto CheckCompletelyBeforeOrAfter = [&]() { |
| 3134 | auto *APtr = A.getPointer(); |
| 3135 | auto *BPtr = B.getPointer(); |
| 3136 | Type *ATy = getLoadStoreType(I: InstMap[AIdx]); |
| 3137 | Type *BTy = getLoadStoreType(I: InstMap[BIdx]); |
| 3138 | const SCEV *Src = PSE.getSCEV(V: APtr); |
| 3139 | const SCEV *Sink = PSE.getSCEV(V: BPtr); |
| 3140 | return areAccessesCompletelyBeforeOrAfter(Src, SrcTy: ATy, Sink, SinkTy: BTy); |
| 3141 | }; |
| 3142 | |
| 3143 | // Get the dependence distance, stride, type size and what access writes for |
| 3144 | // the dependence between A and B. |
| 3145 | auto Res = |
| 3146 | getDependenceDistanceStrideAndSize(A, AInst: InstMap[AIdx], B, BInst: InstMap[BIdx]); |
| 3147 | if (std::holds_alternative<Dependence::DepType>(v: Res)) { |
| 3148 | if (std::get<Dependence::DepType>(v&: Res) == Dependence::Unknown && |
| 3149 | CheckCompletelyBeforeOrAfter()) |
| 3150 | return Dependence::NoDep; |
| 3151 | return std::get<Dependence::DepType>(v&: Res); |
| 3152 | } |
| 3153 | |
| 3154 | auto &[Dist, MaxStride, CommonStride, TypeByteSize, AIsWrite, BIsWrite] = |
| 3155 | std::get<DepDistanceStrideAndSizeInfo>(v&: Res); |
| 3156 | bool HasSameSize = TypeByteSize > 0; |
| 3157 | |
| 3158 | ScalarEvolution &SE = *PSE.getSE(); |
| 3159 | auto &DL = InnermostLoop->getHeader()->getDataLayout(); |
| 3160 | |
| 3161 | // If the distance between the acecsses is larger than their maximum absolute |
| 3162 | // stride multiplied by the symbolic maximum backedge taken count (which is an |
| 3163 | // upper bound of the number of iterations), the accesses are independet, i.e. |
| 3164 | // they are far enough appart that accesses won't access the same location |
| 3165 | // across all loop ierations. |
| 3166 | if (HasSameSize && |
| 3167 | isSafeDependenceDistance(SE, MaxBTC: *(PSE.getSymbolicMaxBackedgeTakenCount()), |
| 3168 | Dist: *Dist, MaxStride)) |
| 3169 | return Dependence::NoDep; |
| 3170 | |
| 3171 | const APInt *APDist = nullptr; |
| 3172 | uint64_t ConstDist = 0; |
| 3173 | if (match(S: Dist, P: m_scev_APInt(C&: APDist))) { |
| 3174 | std::optional<uint64_t> Val = APDist->abs().tryZExtValue(); |
| 3175 | if (!Val) { |
| 3176 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Constant distance does not fit in 64 bits.\n" ); |
| 3177 | return Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3178 | } |
| 3179 | ConstDist = *Val; |
| 3180 | } |
| 3181 | |
| 3182 | // Attempt to prove strided accesses independent. |
| 3183 | if (APDist) { |
| 3184 | // If the distance between accesses and their strides are known constants, |
| 3185 | // check whether the accesses interlace each other. |
| 3186 | if (ConstDist > 0 && CommonStride && CommonStride > 1 && HasSameSize && |
| 3187 | areStridedAccessesIndependent(Distance: ConstDist, Stride: *CommonStride, TypeByteSize)) { |
| 3188 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Strided accesses are independent\n" ); |
| 3189 | return Dependence::NoDep; |
| 3190 | } |
| 3191 | } else { |
| 3192 | Dist = SE.applyLoopGuards(Expr: Dist, Guards&: LoopGuards); |
| 3193 | } |
| 3194 | |
| 3195 | // Negative distances are not plausible dependencies. |
| 3196 | if (SE.isKnownNonPositive(S: Dist)) { |
| 3197 | if (SE.isKnownNonNegative(S: Dist)) { |
| 3198 | // Equal-sized accesses to the same location are forward. |
| 3199 | if (HasSameSize) |
| 3200 | return Dependence::Forward; |
| 3201 | |
| 3202 | if (CommonStride) { |
| 3203 | // For mixed sizes, CommonStride is asserted to cover both accesses when |
| 3204 | // computed in getDependenceDistanceStrideAndSize, so different |
| 3205 | // iterations cannot overlap. |
| 3206 | [[maybe_unused]] uint64_t ASz = |
| 3207 | DL.getTypeAllocSize(Ty: getLoadStoreType(I: InstMap[AIdx])); |
| 3208 | [[maybe_unused]] uint64_t BSz = |
| 3209 | DL.getTypeAllocSize(Ty: getLoadStoreType(I: InstMap[BIdx])); |
| 3210 | assert(*CommonStride >= std::max(ASz, BSz) && |
| 3211 | "Invariant from getDependenceDistanceStrideAndSize broken!" ); |
| 3212 | return Dependence::Forward; |
| 3213 | } |
| 3214 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: possibly zero dependence difference but " |
| 3215 | "different type sizes\n" ); |
| 3216 | return Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3217 | } |
| 3218 | |
| 3219 | bool IsTrueDataDependence = (AIsWrite && !BIsWrite); |
| 3220 | // Check if the first access writes to a location that is read in a later |
| 3221 | // iteration, where the distance between them is not a multiple of a vector |
| 3222 | // factor and relatively small. |
| 3223 | // |
| 3224 | // NOTE: There is no need to update MaxSafeVectorWidthInBits after call to |
| 3225 | // couldPreventStoreLoadForward, even if it changed MinDepDistBytes, since a |
| 3226 | // forward dependency will allow vectorization using any width. |
| 3227 | |
| 3228 | if (IsTrueDataDependence && EnableForwardingConflictDetection) { |
| 3229 | if (!ConstDist) { |
| 3230 | return CheckCompletelyBeforeOrAfter() ? Dependence::NoDep |
| 3231 | : Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3232 | } |
| 3233 | if (!HasSameSize || |
| 3234 | couldPreventStoreLoadForward(Distance: ConstDist, TypeByteSize)) { |
| 3235 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 3236 | dbgs() << "LAA: Forward but may prevent st->ld forwarding\n" ); |
| 3237 | return Dependence::ForwardButPreventsForwarding; |
| 3238 | } |
| 3239 | } |
| 3240 | |
| 3241 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Dependence is negative\n" ); |
| 3242 | return Dependence::Forward; |
| 3243 | } |
| 3244 | |
| 3245 | std::optional<int64_t> MinDistanceOpt = |
| 3246 | SE.getSignedRangeMin(S: Dist).trySExtValue(); |
| 3247 | if (!MinDistanceOpt) { |
| 3248 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Minimum distance does not fit in 64 bits.\n" ); |
| 3249 | return Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3250 | } |
| 3251 | int64_t MinDistance = *MinDistanceOpt; |
| 3252 | // Below we only handle strictly positive distances. |
| 3253 | if (MinDistance <= 0) { |
| 3254 | return CheckCompletelyBeforeOrAfter() ? Dependence::NoDep |
| 3255 | : Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3256 | } |
| 3257 | |
| 3258 | if (!HasSameSize) { |
| 3259 | if (CheckCompletelyBeforeOrAfter()) |
| 3260 | return Dependence::NoDep; |
| 3261 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: ReadWrite-Write positive dependency with " |
| 3262 | "different type sizes\n" ); |
| 3263 | return Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3264 | } |
| 3265 | // Bail out early if passed-in parameters make vectorization not feasible. |
| 3266 | unsigned MinForcedFactor = |
| 3267 | std::max(a: 1U, b: VectorizerParams::VectorizationFactor.getKnownMinValue()); |
| 3268 | unsigned ForcedUnroll = (VectorizerParams::VectorizationInterleave ? |
| 3269 | VectorizerParams::VectorizationInterleave : 1); |
| 3270 | // The minimum number of iterations for a vectorized/unrolled version. |
| 3271 | unsigned MinNumIter = std::max(a: MinForcedFactor * ForcedUnroll, b: 2U); |
| 3272 | |
| 3273 | // It's not vectorizable if the distance is smaller than the minimum distance |
| 3274 | // needed for a vectroized/unrolled version. Vectorizing one iteration in |
| 3275 | // front needs MaxStride. Vectorizing the last iteration needs TypeByteSize. |
| 3276 | // (No need to plus the last gap distance). |
| 3277 | // |
| 3278 | // E.g. Assume one char is 1 byte in memory and one int is 4 bytes. |
| 3279 | // foo(int *A) { |
| 3280 | // int *B = (int *)((char *)A + 14); |
| 3281 | // for (i = 0 ; i < 1024 ; i += 2) |
| 3282 | // B[i] = A[i] + 1; |
| 3283 | // } |
| 3284 | // |
| 3285 | // Two accesses in memory (stride is 4 * 2): |
| 3286 | // | A[0] | | A[2] | | A[4] | | A[6] | | |
| 3287 | // | B[0] | | B[2] | | B[4] | |
| 3288 | // |
| 3289 | // MinDistance needs for vectorizing iterations except the last iteration: |
| 3290 | // 4 * 2 * (MinNumIter - 1). MinDistance needs for the last iteration: 4. |
| 3291 | // So the minimum distance needed is: 4 * 2 * (MinNumIter - 1) + 4. |
| 3292 | // |
| 3293 | // If MinNumIter is 2, it is vectorizable as the minimum distance needed is |
| 3294 | // 12, which is less than distance. |
| 3295 | // |
| 3296 | // If MinNumIter is 4 (Say if a user forces the vectorization factor to be 4), |
| 3297 | // the minimum distance needed is 28, which is greater than distance. It is |
| 3298 | // not safe to do vectorization. |
| 3299 | // |
| 3300 | // We use MaxStride (maximum of src and sink strides) to get a conservative |
| 3301 | // lower bound on the MinDistanceNeeded in case of different strides. |
| 3302 | |
| 3303 | // We know that Dist is positive, but it may not be constant. Use the signed |
| 3304 | // minimum for computations below, as this ensures we compute the closest |
| 3305 | // possible dependence distance. |
| 3306 | uint64_t MinDistanceNeeded = MaxStride * (MinNumIter - 1) + TypeByteSize; |
| 3307 | if (MinDistanceNeeded > static_cast<uint64_t>(MinDistance)) { |
| 3308 | if (!ConstDist) { |
| 3309 | // For non-constant distances, we checked the lower bound of the |
| 3310 | // dependence distance and the distance may be larger at runtime (and safe |
| 3311 | // for vectorization). Classify it as Unknown, so we re-try with runtime |
| 3312 | // checks, unless we can prove both accesses cannot overlap. |
| 3313 | return CheckCompletelyBeforeOrAfter() ? Dependence::NoDep |
| 3314 | : Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3315 | } |
| 3316 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Failure because of positive minimum distance " |
| 3317 | << MinDistance << '\n'); |
| 3318 | return Dependence::Backward; |
| 3319 | } |
| 3320 | |
| 3321 | // Unsafe if the minimum distance needed is greater than smallest dependence |
| 3322 | // distance distance. |
| 3323 | if (MinDistanceNeeded > MinDepDistBytes) { |
| 3324 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Failure because it needs at least " |
| 3325 | << MinDistanceNeeded << " size in bytes\n" ); |
| 3326 | return Dependence::Backward; |
| 3327 | } |
| 3328 | |
| 3329 | MinDepDistBytes = |
| 3330 | std::min(a: static_cast<uint64_t>(MinDistance), b: MinDepDistBytes); |
| 3331 | |
| 3332 | bool IsTrueDataDependence = (!AIsWrite && BIsWrite); |
| 3333 | if (IsTrueDataDependence && EnableForwardingConflictDetection && ConstDist && |
| 3334 | couldPreventStoreLoadForward(Distance: MinDistance, TypeByteSize, CommonStride: *CommonStride)) |
| 3335 | return Dependence::BackwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding; |
| 3336 | |
| 3337 | uint64_t MaxVF = MinDepDistBytes / MaxStride; |
| 3338 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Positive min distance " << MinDistance |
| 3339 | << " with max VF = " << MaxVF << '\n'); |
| 3340 | |
| 3341 | uint64_t MaxVFInBits = MaxVF * TypeByteSize * 8; |
| 3342 | if (!ConstDist && MaxVFInBits < MaxTargetVectorWidthInBits) { |
| 3343 | // For non-constant distances, we checked the lower bound of the dependence |
| 3344 | // distance and the distance may be larger at runtime (and safe for |
| 3345 | // vectorization). Classify it as Unknown, so we re-try with runtime checks, |
| 3346 | // unless we can prove both accesses cannot overlap. |
| 3347 | return CheckCompletelyBeforeOrAfter() ? Dependence::NoDep |
| 3348 | : Dependence::Unknown; |
| 3349 | } |
| 3350 | |
| 3351 | if (CheckCompletelyBeforeOrAfter()) |
| 3352 | return Dependence::NoDep; |
| 3353 | |
| 3354 | MaxSafeVectorWidthInBits = std::min(a: MaxSafeVectorWidthInBits, b: MaxVFInBits); |
| 3355 | return Dependence::BackwardVectorizable; |
| 3356 | } |
| 3357 | |
| 3358 | bool MemoryDepChecker::areDepsSafe(const DepCandidates &DepCands, |
| 3359 | ArrayRef<MemAccessInfo> CheckDeps) { |
| 3360 | |
| 3361 | MinDepDistBytes = -1; |
| 3362 | SmallPtrSet<MemAccessInfo, 8> Visited; |
| 3363 | for (MemAccessInfo CurAccess : CheckDeps) { |
| 3364 | if (Visited.contains(Ptr: CurAccess)) |
| 3365 | continue; |
| 3366 | |
| 3367 | // Check accesses within this set. |
| 3368 | EquivalenceClasses<MemAccessInfo>::member_iterator AI = |
| 3369 | DepCands.findLeader(V: CurAccess); |
| 3370 | EquivalenceClasses<MemAccessInfo>::member_iterator AE = |
| 3371 | DepCands.member_end(); |
| 3372 | |
| 3373 | // Check every access pair. |
| 3374 | while (AI != AE) { |
| 3375 | Visited.insert(Ptr: *AI); |
| 3376 | bool AIIsWrite = AI->getInt(); |
| 3377 | // Reads from the same pointer don't create extra hazards, but multiple |
| 3378 | // stores do (WAW), so start from AI for writes and next(AI) for reads. |
| 3379 | EquivalenceClasses<MemAccessInfo>::member_iterator OI = |
| 3380 | (AIIsWrite ? AI : std::next(x: AI)); |
| 3381 | while (OI != AE) { |
| 3382 | // Check every accessing instruction pair in program order. |
| 3383 | auto &Acc = Accesses[*AI]; |
| 3384 | for (std::vector<unsigned>::iterator I1 = Acc.begin(), I1E = Acc.end(); |
| 3385 | I1 != I1E; ++I1) |
| 3386 | // When checking for WAW (OI == AI) caused by multiple writes to the |
| 3387 | // same pointer, start I2 at the next access past I1 to avoid |
| 3388 | // self-comparison. |
| 3389 | for (std::vector<unsigned>::iterator |
| 3390 | I2 = (OI == AI ? std::next(x: I1) : Accesses[*OI].begin()), |
| 3391 | I2E = (OI == AI ? I1E : Accesses[*OI].end()); |
| 3392 | I2 != I2E; ++I2) { |
| 3393 | auto A = std::make_pair(x: &*AI, y&: *I1); |
| 3394 | auto B = std::make_pair(x: &*OI, y&: *I2); |
| 3395 | |
| 3396 | assert(*I1 != *I2); |
| 3397 | if (*I1 > *I2) |
| 3398 | std::swap(x&: A, y&: B); |
| 3399 | |
| 3400 | Dependence::DepType Type = |
| 3401 | isDependent(A: *A.first, AIdx: A.second, B: *B.first, BIdx: B.second); |
| 3402 | mergeInStatus(S: Dependence::isSafeForVectorization(Type)); |
| 3403 | |
| 3404 | // Gather dependences unless we accumulated MaxDependences |
| 3405 | // dependences. In that case return as soon as we find the first |
| 3406 | // unsafe dependence. This puts a limit on this quadratic |
| 3407 | // algorithm. |
| 3408 | if (RecordDependences) { |
| 3409 | if (Type != Dependence::NoDep) |
| 3410 | Dependences.emplace_back(Args&: A.second, Args&: B.second, Args&: Type); |
| 3411 | |
| 3412 | if (Dependences.size() >= MaxDependences) { |
| 3413 | RecordDependences = false; |
| 3414 | Dependences.clear(); |
| 3415 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() |
| 3416 | << "Too many dependences, stopped recording\n" ); |
| 3417 | } |
| 3418 | } |
| 3419 | if (!RecordDependences && !isSafeForVectorization()) |
| 3420 | return false; |
| 3421 | } |
| 3422 | ++OI; |
| 3423 | } |
| 3424 | ++AI; |
| 3425 | } |
| 3426 | } |
| 3427 | |
| 3428 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Total Dependences: " << Dependences.size() << "\n" ); |
| 3429 | return isSafeForVectorization(); |
| 3430 | } |
| 3431 | |
| 3432 | SmallVector<Instruction *, 4> |
| 3433 | MemoryDepChecker::getInstructionsForAccess(Value *Ptr, bool IsWrite) const { |
| 3434 | MemAccessInfo Access(Ptr, IsWrite); |
| 3435 | auto I = Accesses.find(Val: Access); |
| 3436 | SmallVector<Instruction *, 4> Insts; |
| 3437 | if (I != Accesses.end()) { |
| 3438 | transform(Range: I->second, d_first: std::back_inserter(x&: Insts), |
| 3439 | F: [&](unsigned Idx) { return this->InstMap[Idx]; }); |
| 3440 | } |
| 3441 | |
| 3442 | return Insts; |
| 3443 | } |
| 3444 | |
| 3445 | const char *MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::DepName[] = { |
| 3446 | "NoDep" , |
| 3447 | "Unknown" , |
| 3448 | "IndirectUnsafe" , |
| 3449 | "InvariantUnsafe" , |
| 3450 | "Forward" , |
| 3451 | "ForwardButPreventsForwarding" , |
| 3452 | "Backward" , |
| 3453 | "BackwardVectorizable" , |
| 3454 | "BackwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding" }; |
| 3455 | |
| 3456 | void MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::print( |
| 3457 | raw_ostream &OS, unsigned Depth, |
| 3458 | const SmallVectorImpl<Instruction *> &Instrs) const { |
| 3459 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << DepName[Type] << ":\n" ; |
| 3460 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth + 2) << *Instrs[Source] << " -> \n" ; |
| 3461 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth + 2) << *Instrs[Destination] << "\n" ; |
| 3462 | } |
| 3463 | |
| 3464 | bool LoopAccessInfo::canAnalyzeLoop() { |
| 3465 | // We need to have a loop header. |
| 3466 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nLAA: Checking a loop in '" |
| 3467 | << TheLoop->getHeader()->getParent()->getName() << "' from " |
| 3468 | << TheLoop->getLocStr() << "\n" ); |
| 3469 | |
| 3470 | // We can only analyze innermost loops. |
| 3471 | if (!TheLoop->isInnermost()) { |
| 3472 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: loop is not the innermost loop\n" ); |
| 3473 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "NotInnerMostLoop" ) << "loop is not the innermost loop" ; |
| 3474 | return false; |
| 3475 | } |
| 3476 | |
| 3477 | // We must have a single backedge. |
| 3478 | if (TheLoop->getNumBackEdges() != 1) { |
| 3479 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 3480 | dbgs() << "LAA: loop control flow is not understood by analyzer\n" ); |
| 3481 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "CFGNotUnderstood" ) |
| 3482 | << "loop control flow is not understood by analyzer" ; |
| 3483 | return false; |
| 3484 | } |
| 3485 | |
| 3486 | // ScalarEvolution needs to be able to find the symbolic max backedge taken |
| 3487 | // count, which is an upper bound on the number of loop iterations. The loop |
| 3488 | // may execute fewer iterations, if it exits via an uncountable exit. |
| 3489 | const SCEV *ExitCount = PSE->getSymbolicMaxBackedgeTakenCount(); |
| 3490 | if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(Val: ExitCount)) { |
| 3491 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "CantComputeNumberOfIterations" ) |
| 3492 | << "could not determine number of loop iterations" ; |
| 3493 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: SCEV could not compute the loop exit count.\n" ); |
| 3494 | return false; |
| 3495 | } |
| 3496 | |
| 3497 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found an analyzable loop: " |
| 3498 | << TheLoop->getHeader()->getName() << "\n" ); |
| 3499 | return true; |
| 3500 | } |
| 3501 | |
| 3502 | bool LoopAccessInfo::analyzeLoop(AAResults *AA, const LoopInfo *LI, |
| 3503 | const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, |
| 3504 | DominatorTree *DT) { |
| 3505 | // Holds the Load and Store instructions. |
| 3506 | SmallVector<LoadInst *, 16> Loads; |
| 3507 | SmallVector<StoreInst *, 16> Stores; |
| 3508 | SmallPtrSet<MDNode *, 8> LoopAliasScopes; |
| 3509 | |
| 3510 | // Holds all the different accesses in the loop. |
| 3511 | unsigned NumReads = 0; |
| 3512 | unsigned NumReadWrites = 0; |
| 3513 | |
| 3514 | bool HasComplexMemInst = false; |
| 3515 | |
| 3516 | // A runtime check is only legal to insert if there are no convergent calls. |
| 3517 | HasConvergentOp = false; |
| 3518 | |
| 3519 | PtrRtChecking->Pointers.clear(); |
| 3520 | PtrRtChecking->Need = false; |
| 3521 | |
| 3522 | const bool IsAnnotatedParallel = TheLoop->isAnnotatedParallel(); |
| 3523 | |
| 3524 | const bool EnableMemAccessVersioningOfLoop = |
| 3525 | EnableMemAccessVersioning && |
| 3526 | !TheLoop->getHeader()->getParent()->hasOptSize(); |
| 3527 | |
| 3528 | // Traverse blocks in fixed RPOT order, regardless of their storage in the |
| 3529 | // loop info, as it may be arbitrary. |
| 3530 | LoopBlocksRPO RPOT(TheLoop); |
| 3531 | RPOT.perform(LI); |
| 3532 | |
| 3533 | // Don't return early as soon as we found a memory access that cannot be |
| 3534 | // vectorize - HasConvergentOp must still be computed as it is part of LAI's |
| 3535 | // public API (used by LoopDistribute). |
| 3536 | for (BasicBlock *BB : RPOT) { |
| 3537 | // Scan the BB and collect legal loads and stores. Also detect any |
| 3538 | // convergent instructions. |
| 3539 | for (Instruction &I : *BB) { |
| 3540 | if (auto *Call = dyn_cast<CallBase>(Val: &I)) { |
| 3541 | if (Call->isConvergent()) |
| 3542 | HasConvergentOp = true; |
| 3543 | } |
| 3544 | |
| 3545 | // Unsafe to vectorize and we already found a convergent operation, can |
| 3546 | // early return now. |
| 3547 | if (HasComplexMemInst && HasConvergentOp) |
| 3548 | return false; |
| 3549 | |
| 3550 | // Already unsafe to vectorize; keep scanning for convergent ops. |
| 3551 | if (HasComplexMemInst) |
| 3552 | continue; |
| 3553 | |
| 3554 | // Record alias scopes defined inside the loop. |
| 3555 | if (auto *Decl = dyn_cast<NoAliasScopeDeclInst>(Val: &I)) |
| 3556 | for (Metadata *Op : Decl->getScopeList()->operands()) |
| 3557 | LoopAliasScopes.insert(Ptr: cast<MDNode>(Val: Op)); |
| 3558 | |
| 3559 | // Operand bundles may access memory, even if the callee does not. |
| 3560 | auto *CB = dyn_cast<CallBase>(Val: &I); |
| 3561 | if (CB && CB->hasReadingOperandBundles()) { |
| 3562 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "CantVectorizeInstruction" , Instr: &I) |
| 3563 | << "call instruction with operand bundles cannot be vectorized" ; |
| 3564 | HasComplexMemInst = true; |
| 3565 | continue; |
| 3566 | } |
| 3567 | |
| 3568 | // Many math library functions read the rounding mode. We will only |
| 3569 | // vectorize a loop if it contains known function calls that don't set |
| 3570 | // the flag. Therefore, it is safe to ignore this read from memory. |
| 3571 | auto *Call = dyn_cast<CallInst>(Val: &I); |
| 3572 | if (Call && getVectorIntrinsicIDForCall(CI: Call, TLI)) |
| 3573 | continue; |
| 3574 | |
| 3575 | // If this is a load, save it. If this instruction can read from memory |
| 3576 | // but is not a load, we only allow it if it's a call to a function with a |
| 3577 | // vector mapping and no pointer arguments. |
| 3578 | if (I.mayReadFromMemory()) { |
| 3579 | auto hasPointerArgs = [](CallBase *CB) { |
| 3580 | return any_of(Range: CB->args(), P: [](Value const *Arg) { |
| 3581 | return Arg->getType()->isPointerTy(); |
| 3582 | }); |
| 3583 | }; |
| 3584 | |
| 3585 | // If the function has an explicit vectorized counterpart, and does not |
| 3586 | // take output/input pointers, we can safely assume that it can be |
| 3587 | // vectorized. |
| 3588 | if (Call && !Call->isNoBuiltin() && Call->getCalledFunction() && |
| 3589 | !hasPointerArgs(Call) && !VFDatabase::getMappings(CI: *Call).empty()) |
| 3590 | continue; |
| 3591 | |
| 3592 | auto *Ld = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(Val: &I); |
| 3593 | if (!Ld) { |
| 3594 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "CantVectorizeInstruction" , Instr: &I) |
| 3595 | << "instruction cannot be vectorized" ; |
| 3596 | HasComplexMemInst = true; |
| 3597 | continue; |
| 3598 | } |
| 3599 | if (!Ld->isSimple() && !IsAnnotatedParallel) { |
| 3600 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "NonSimpleLoad" , Instr: Ld) |
| 3601 | << "read with atomic ordering or volatile read" ; |
| 3602 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a non-simple load.\n" ); |
| 3603 | HasComplexMemInst = true; |
| 3604 | continue; |
| 3605 | } |
| 3606 | Loads.push_back(Elt: Ld); |
| 3607 | DepChecker->addAccess(LI: Ld); |
| 3608 | if (EnableMemAccessVersioningOfLoop) |
| 3609 | collectStridedAccess(LoadOrStoreInst: Ld); |
| 3610 | continue; |
| 3611 | } |
| 3612 | |
| 3613 | // Save 'store' instructions. Abort if other instructions write to memory. |
| 3614 | if (I.mayWriteToMemory()) { |
| 3615 | auto *St = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Val: &I); |
| 3616 | if (!St) { |
| 3617 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "CantVectorizeInstruction" , Instr: &I) |
| 3618 | << "instruction cannot be vectorized" ; |
| 3619 | HasComplexMemInst = true; |
| 3620 | continue; |
| 3621 | } |
| 3622 | if (!St->isSimple() && !IsAnnotatedParallel) { |
| 3623 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "NonSimpleStore" , Instr: St) |
| 3624 | << "write with atomic ordering or volatile write" ; |
| 3625 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a non-simple store.\n" ); |
| 3626 | HasComplexMemInst = true; |
| 3627 | continue; |
| 3628 | } |
| 3629 | Stores.push_back(Elt: St); |
| 3630 | DepChecker->addAccess(SI: St); |
| 3631 | if (EnableMemAccessVersioningOfLoop) |
| 3632 | collectStridedAccess(LoadOrStoreInst: St); |
| 3633 | } |
| 3634 | } // Next instr. |
| 3635 | } // Next block. |
| 3636 | |
| 3637 | if (HasComplexMemInst) |
| 3638 | return false; |
| 3639 | |
| 3640 | // Now we have two lists that hold the loads and the stores. |
| 3641 | // Next, we find the pointers that they use. |
| 3642 | |
| 3643 | // Check if we see any stores. If there are no stores, then we don't |
| 3644 | // care if the pointers are *restrict*. |
| 3645 | if (!Stores.size()) { |
| 3646 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a read-only loop!\n" ); |
| 3647 | return true; |
| 3648 | } |
| 3649 | |
| 3650 | MemoryDepChecker::DepCandidates DepCands; |
| 3651 | AccessAnalysis Accesses(TheLoop, AA, LI, *DT, DepCands, *PSE, |
| 3652 | LoopAliasScopes); |
| 3653 | |
| 3654 | // Holds the analyzed pointers. We don't want to call getUnderlyingObjects |
| 3655 | // multiple times on the same object. If the ptr is accessed twice, once |
| 3656 | // for read and once for write, it will only appear once (on the write |
| 3657 | // list). This is okay, since we are going to check for conflicts between |
| 3658 | // writes and between reads and writes, but not between reads and reads. |
| 3659 | SmallSet<std::pair<Value *, Type *>, 16> Seen; |
| 3660 | |
| 3661 | // Record uniform store addresses to identify if we have multiple stores |
| 3662 | // to the same address. |
| 3663 | SmallPtrSet<Value *, 16> UniformStores; |
| 3664 | |
| 3665 | for (StoreInst *ST : Stores) { |
| 3666 | Value *Ptr = ST->getPointerOperand(); |
| 3667 | |
| 3668 | if (isInvariant(V: Ptr)) { |
| 3669 | // Record store instructions to loop invariant addresses |
| 3670 | StoresToInvariantAddresses.push_back(Elt: ST); |
| 3671 | HasStoreStoreDependenceInvolvingLoopInvariantAddress |= |
| 3672 | !UniformStores.insert(Ptr).second; |
| 3673 | } |
| 3674 | |
| 3675 | // If we did *not* see this pointer before, insert it to the read-write |
| 3676 | // list. At this phase it is only a 'write' list. |
| 3677 | Type *AccessTy = getLoadStoreType(I: ST); |
| 3678 | if (Seen.insert(V: {Ptr, AccessTy}).second) { |
| 3679 | ++NumReadWrites; |
| 3680 | |
| 3681 | MemoryLocation Loc = MemoryLocation::get(SI: ST); |
| 3682 | // The TBAA metadata could have a control dependency on the predication |
| 3683 | // condition, so we cannot rely on it when determining whether or not we |
| 3684 | // need runtime pointer checks. |
| 3685 | if (blockNeedsPredication(BB: ST->getParent(), TheLoop, DT)) |
| 3686 | Loc.AATags.TBAA = nullptr; |
| 3687 | |
| 3688 | // Expand forked pointers (i.e., a phi of multiple strided pointers) into |
| 3689 | // all alternatives. |
| 3690 | visitPointers(StartPtr: const_cast<Value *>(Loc.Ptr), InnermostLoop: *TheLoop, |
| 3691 | AddPointer: [&Accesses, AccessTy, Loc](Value *Ptr) { |
| 3692 | MemoryLocation NewLoc = Loc.getWithNewPtr(NewPtr: Ptr); |
| 3693 | Accesses.addStore(Loc: NewLoc, AccessTy); |
| 3694 | }); |
| 3695 | } |
| 3696 | } |
| 3697 | |
| 3698 | if (IsAnnotatedParallel) { |
| 3699 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 3700 | dbgs() << "LAA: A loop annotated parallel, ignore memory dependency " |
| 3701 | << "checks.\n" ); |
| 3702 | return true; |
| 3703 | } |
| 3704 | |
| 3705 | for (LoadInst *LD : Loads) { |
| 3706 | Value *Ptr = LD->getPointerOperand(); |
| 3707 | // If we did *not* see this pointer before, insert it to the read list. If |
| 3708 | // we *did* see it before, then it is already in the read-write list. This |
| 3709 | // allows us to vectorize expressions such as A[i] += x; Because the address |
| 3710 | // of A[i] is a read-write pointer. This only works if the index of A[i] is |
| 3711 | // strictly monotonic, which we approximate (conservatively) via |
| 3712 | // getPtrStride. If the address is unknown (e.g. A[B[i]]) then we may read, |
| 3713 | // modify, and write overlapping words. Note that "zero stride" is unsafe |
| 3714 | // and is being handled below. |
| 3715 | bool IsReadOnlyPtr = false; |
| 3716 | Type *AccessTy = getLoadStoreType(I: LD); |
| 3717 | if (Seen.insert(V: {Ptr, AccessTy}).second || |
| 3718 | !getPtrStride(PSE&: *PSE, AccessTy, Ptr, Lp: TheLoop, DT: *DT, StridesMap: SymbolicStrides, |
| 3719 | ShouldCheckWrap: true)) { |
| 3720 | ++NumReads; |
| 3721 | IsReadOnlyPtr = true; |
| 3722 | } |
| 3723 | |
| 3724 | // See if there is an unsafe dependency between a load to a uniform address and |
| 3725 | // store to the same uniform address. |
| 3726 | if (UniformStores.contains(Ptr)) { |
| 3727 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found an unsafe dependency between a uniform " |
| 3728 | "load and uniform store to the same address!\n" ); |
| 3729 | HasLoadStoreDependenceInvolvingLoopInvariantAddress = true; |
| 3730 | } |
| 3731 | |
| 3732 | MemoryLocation Loc = MemoryLocation::get(LI: LD); |
| 3733 | // The TBAA metadata could have a control dependency on the predication |
| 3734 | // condition, so we cannot rely on it when determining whether or not we |
| 3735 | // need runtime pointer checks. |
| 3736 | if (blockNeedsPredication(BB: LD->getParent(), TheLoop, DT)) |
| 3737 | Loc.AATags.TBAA = nullptr; |
| 3738 | |
| 3739 | // Expand forked pointers (i.e., a phi of multiple strided pointers) into |
| 3740 | // all alternatives. |
| 3741 | visitPointers(StartPtr: const_cast<Value *>(Loc.Ptr), InnermostLoop: *TheLoop, |
| 3742 | AddPointer: [&Accesses, AccessTy, Loc, IsReadOnlyPtr](Value *Ptr) { |
| 3743 | MemoryLocation NewLoc = Loc.getWithNewPtr(NewPtr: Ptr); |
| 3744 | Accesses.addLoad(Loc: NewLoc, AccessTy, IsReadOnly: IsReadOnlyPtr); |
| 3745 | }); |
| 3746 | } |
| 3747 | |
| 3748 | // If we write (or read-write) to a single destination and there are no other |
| 3749 | // reads in this loop then is it safe to vectorize: the vectorized stores |
| 3750 | // preserve ordering via replication or order-preserving @llvm.masked.scatter. |
| 3751 | if (NumReadWrites == 1 && NumReads == 0) { |
| 3752 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a write-only loop!\n" ); |
| 3753 | return true; |
| 3754 | } |
| 3755 | |
| 3756 | // Build dependence sets and check whether we need a runtime pointer bounds |
| 3757 | // check. |
| 3758 | Accesses.buildDependenceSets(); |
| 3759 | |
| 3760 | // Find pointers with computable bounds. We are going to use this information |
| 3761 | // to place a runtime bound check. |
| 3762 | Value *UncomputablePtr = nullptr; |
| 3763 | HasCompletePtrRtChecking = |
| 3764 | Accesses.canCheckPtrAtRT(RtCheck&: *PtrRtChecking, TheLoop, StridesMap: SymbolicStrides, |
| 3765 | UncomputablePtr, AllowPartial, DepChecker: getDepChecker()); |
| 3766 | if (!HasCompletePtrRtChecking) { |
| 3767 | const auto *I = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(Val: UncomputablePtr); |
| 3768 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "CantIdentifyArrayBounds" , Instr: I) |
| 3769 | << "cannot identify array bounds" ; |
| 3770 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: We can't vectorize because we can't find " |
| 3771 | << "the array bounds.\n" ); |
| 3772 | return false; |
| 3773 | } |
| 3774 | |
| 3775 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 3776 | dbgs() << "LAA: May be able to perform a memory runtime check if needed.\n" ); |
| 3777 | |
| 3778 | bool DepsAreSafe = true; |
| 3779 | if (Accesses.isDependencyCheckNeeded()) { |
| 3780 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Checking memory dependencies\n" ); |
| 3781 | DepsAreSafe = |
| 3782 | DepChecker->areDepsSafe(DepCands, CheckDeps: Accesses.getDependenciesToCheck()); |
| 3783 | |
| 3784 | if (!DepsAreSafe && DepChecker->shouldRetryWithRuntimeChecks()) { |
| 3785 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Retrying with memory checks\n" ); |
| 3786 | |
| 3787 | PtrRtChecking->reset(); |
| 3788 | PtrRtChecking->Need = true; |
| 3789 | |
| 3790 | UncomputablePtr = nullptr; |
| 3791 | HasCompletePtrRtChecking = Accesses.canCheckPtrAtRT( |
| 3792 | RtCheck&: *PtrRtChecking, TheLoop, StridesMap: SymbolicStrides, UncomputablePtr, |
| 3793 | AllowPartial, DepChecker: getDepChecker()); |
| 3794 | |
| 3795 | // Check that we found the bounds for the pointer. |
| 3796 | if (!HasCompletePtrRtChecking) { |
| 3797 | auto *I = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(Val: UncomputablePtr); |
| 3798 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "CantCheckMemDepsAtRunTime" , Instr: I) |
| 3799 | << "cannot check memory dependencies at runtime" ; |
| 3800 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Can't vectorize with memory checks\n" ); |
| 3801 | return false; |
| 3802 | } |
| 3803 | |
| 3804 | // Clear the dependency checks. They are no longer needed. |
| 3805 | Accesses.resetDepChecks(DepChecker&: *DepChecker); |
| 3806 | |
| 3807 | DepsAreSafe = true; |
| 3808 | } |
| 3809 | } |
| 3810 | |
| 3811 | // Update the invariant address dependence flags based on dependences found |
| 3812 | // by the dep checker. Even if dependences were not recorded (too many to |
| 3813 | // track), any InvariantUnsafe dep would still have set the status to Unsafe |
| 3814 | if (const auto *Deps = DepChecker->getDependences()) { |
| 3815 | for (const auto &Dep : *Deps) { |
| 3816 | if (Dep.Type != MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::InvariantUnsafe) |
| 3817 | continue; |
| 3818 | Instruction *Src = Dep.getSource(DepChecker: *DepChecker); |
| 3819 | Instruction *Dst = Dep.getDestination(DepChecker: *DepChecker); |
| 3820 | if (isa<LoadInst>(Val: Src) != isa<LoadInst>(Val: Dst)) { |
| 3821 | HasLoadStoreDependenceInvolvingLoopInvariantAddress = true; |
| 3822 | } else { |
| 3823 | assert(isa<StoreInst>(Src) && isa<StoreInst>(Dst) && |
| 3824 | "Expected both to be stores" ); |
| 3825 | HasStoreStoreDependenceInvolvingLoopInvariantAddress = true; |
| 3826 | } |
| 3827 | } |
| 3828 | } |
| 3829 | |
| 3830 | if (HasConvergentOp) { |
| 3831 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "CantInsertRuntimeCheckWithConvergent" ) |
| 3832 | << "cannot add control dependency to convergent operation" ; |
| 3833 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: We can't vectorize because a runtime check " |
| 3834 | "would be needed with a convergent operation\n" ); |
| 3835 | return false; |
| 3836 | } |
| 3837 | |
| 3838 | if (DepsAreSafe) { |
| 3839 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 3840 | dbgs() << "LAA: No unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. We" |
| 3841 | << (PtrRtChecking->Need ? "" : " don't" ) |
| 3842 | << " need runtime memory checks.\n" ); |
| 3843 | return true; |
| 3844 | } |
| 3845 | |
| 3846 | emitUnsafeDependenceRemark(); |
| 3847 | return false; |
| 3848 | } |
| 3849 | |
| 3850 | void LoopAccessInfo::() { |
| 3851 | const auto *Deps = getDepChecker().getDependences(); |
| 3852 | if (!Deps) |
| 3853 | return; |
| 3854 | const auto *Found = |
| 3855 | llvm::find_if(Range: *Deps, P: [](const MemoryDepChecker::Dependence &D) { |
| 3856 | return MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::isSafeForVectorization(Type: D.Type) != |
| 3857 | MemoryDepChecker::VectorizationSafetyStatus::Safe; |
| 3858 | }); |
| 3859 | if (Found == Deps->end()) |
| 3860 | return; |
| 3861 | MemoryDepChecker::Dependence Dep = *Found; |
| 3862 | |
| 3863 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop\n" ); |
| 3864 | |
| 3865 | // Emit remark for first unsafe dependence |
| 3866 | bool HasForcedDistribution = |
| 3867 | getBooleanLoopAttribute(TheLoop, Name: "llvm.loop.distribute.enable" ); |
| 3868 | |
| 3869 | const std::string Info = |
| 3870 | HasForcedDistribution |
| 3871 | ? "unsafe dependent memory operations in loop." |
| 3872 | : "unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use " |
| 3873 | "#pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution " |
| 3874 | "to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate " |
| 3875 | "loop" ; |
| 3876 | OptimizationRemarkAnalysis &R = |
| 3877 | recordAnalysis(RemarkName: "UnsafeDep" , Instr: Dep.getDestination(DepChecker: getDepChecker())) << Info; |
| 3878 | |
| 3879 | switch (Dep.Type) { |
| 3880 | case MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::NoDep: |
| 3881 | case MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::Forward: |
| 3882 | case MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::BackwardVectorizable: |
| 3883 | llvm_unreachable("Unexpected dependence" ); |
| 3884 | case MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::Backward: |
| 3885 | R << "\nBackward loop carried data dependence." ; |
| 3886 | break; |
| 3887 | case MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::ForwardButPreventsForwarding: |
| 3888 | R << "\nForward loop carried data dependence that prevents " |
| 3889 | "store-to-load forwarding." ; |
| 3890 | break; |
| 3891 | case MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::BackwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding: |
| 3892 | R << "\nBackward loop carried data dependence that prevents " |
| 3893 | "store-to-load forwarding." ; |
| 3894 | break; |
| 3895 | case MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::IndirectUnsafe: |
| 3896 | R << "\nUnsafe indirect dependence." ; |
| 3897 | break; |
| 3898 | case MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::InvariantUnsafe: |
| 3899 | R << "\nUnsafe dependence on loop-invariant address." ; |
| 3900 | break; |
| 3901 | case MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::Unknown: |
| 3902 | R << "\nUnknown data dependence." ; |
| 3903 | break; |
| 3904 | } |
| 3905 | |
| 3906 | if (Instruction *I = Dep.getSource(DepChecker: getDepChecker())) { |
| 3907 | DebugLoc SourceLoc = I->getDebugLoc(); |
| 3908 | if (auto *DD = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(Val: getPointerOperand(V: I))) |
| 3909 | SourceLoc = DD->getDebugLoc(); |
| 3910 | if (SourceLoc) |
| 3911 | R << " Memory location is the same as accessed at " |
| 3912 | << ore::NV("Location" , SourceLoc); |
| 3913 | } |
| 3914 | } |
| 3915 | |
| 3916 | bool LoopAccessInfo::blockNeedsPredication(const BasicBlock *BB, |
| 3917 | const Loop *TheLoop, |
| 3918 | const DominatorTree *DT) { |
| 3919 | assert(TheLoop->contains(BB) && "Unknown block used" ); |
| 3920 | |
| 3921 | // Blocks that do not dominate the latch need predication. |
| 3922 | const BasicBlock *Latch = TheLoop->getLoopLatch(); |
| 3923 | assert(Latch && "Loop expected to have a single latch." ); |
| 3924 | return !DT->dominates(A: BB, B: Latch); |
| 3925 | } |
| 3926 | |
| 3927 | OptimizationRemarkAnalysis & |
| 3928 | LoopAccessInfo::recordAnalysis(StringRef , const Instruction *I) { |
| 3929 | assert(!Report && "Multiple reports generated" ); |
| 3930 | |
| 3931 | const BasicBlock *CodeRegion = TheLoop->getHeader(); |
| 3932 | DebugLoc DL = TheLoop->getStartLoc(); |
| 3933 | |
| 3934 | if (I) { |
| 3935 | CodeRegion = I->getParent(); |
| 3936 | // If there is no debug location attached to the instruction, revert back to |
| 3937 | // using the loop's. |
| 3938 | if (I->getDebugLoc()) |
| 3939 | DL = I->getDebugLoc(); |
| 3940 | } |
| 3941 | |
| 3942 | Report = std::make_unique<OptimizationRemarkAnalysis>(DEBUG_TYPE, args&: RemarkName, |
| 3943 | args&: DL, args&: CodeRegion); |
| 3944 | return *Report; |
| 3945 | } |
| 3946 | |
| 3947 | bool LoopAccessInfo::isInvariant(Value *V) const { |
| 3948 | auto *SE = PSE->getSE(); |
| 3949 | if (TheLoop->isLoopInvariant(V)) |
| 3950 | return true; |
| 3951 | if (!SE->isSCEVable(Ty: V->getType())) |
| 3952 | return false; |
| 3953 | const SCEV *S = SE->getSCEV(V); |
| 3954 | return SE->isLoopInvariant(S, L: TheLoop); |
| 3955 | } |
| 3956 | |
| 3957 | /// If \p Ptr is a GEP, which has a loop-variant operand, return that operand. |
| 3958 | /// Otherwise, return \p Ptr. |
| 3959 | static Value *getLoopVariantGEPOperand(Value *Ptr, ScalarEvolution *SE, |
| 3960 | Loop *Lp) { |
| 3961 | auto *GEP = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(Val: Ptr); |
| 3962 | if (!GEP) |
| 3963 | return Ptr; |
| 3964 | |
| 3965 | Value *V = Ptr; |
| 3966 | for (const Use &U : GEP->operands()) { |
| 3967 | if (!SE->isLoopInvariant(S: SE->getSCEV(V: U), L: Lp)) { |
| 3968 | if (V == Ptr) |
| 3969 | V = U; |
| 3970 | else |
| 3971 | // There must be exactly one loop-variant operand. |
| 3972 | return Ptr; |
| 3973 | } |
| 3974 | } |
| 3975 | return V; |
| 3976 | } |
| 3977 | |
| 3978 | /// Get the stride of a pointer access in a loop. Looks for symbolic |
| 3979 | /// strides "a[i*stride]". Returns the symbolic stride, or null otherwise. |
| 3980 | static const SCEV *getStrideFromPointer(Value *Ptr, ScalarEvolution *SE, Loop *Lp) { |
| 3981 | auto *PtrTy = dyn_cast<PointerType>(Val: Ptr->getType()); |
| 3982 | if (!PtrTy) |
| 3983 | return nullptr; |
| 3984 | |
| 3985 | // Try to remove a gep instruction to make the pointer (actually index at this |
| 3986 | // point) easier analyzable. If OrigPtr is equal to Ptr we are analyzing the |
| 3987 | // pointer, otherwise, we are analyzing the index. |
| 3988 | Value *OrigPtr = Ptr; |
| 3989 | |
| 3990 | Ptr = getLoopVariantGEPOperand(Ptr, SE, Lp); |
| 3991 | const SCEV *V = SE->getSCEV(V: Ptr); |
| 3992 | |
| 3993 | if (Ptr != OrigPtr) |
| 3994 | // Strip off casts. |
| 3995 | while (auto *C = dyn_cast<SCEVIntegralCastExpr>(Val: V)) |
| 3996 | V = C->getOperand(); |
| 3997 | |
| 3998 | if (!match(S: V, P: m_scev_AffineAddRec(Op0: m_SCEV(), Op1: m_SCEV(V), L: m_SpecificLoop(L: Lp)))) |
| 3999 | return nullptr; |
| 4000 | |
| 4001 | // Note that the restriction after this loop invariant check are only |
| 4002 | // profitability restrictions. |
| 4003 | if (!SE->isLoopInvariant(S: V, L: Lp)) |
| 4004 | return nullptr; |
| 4005 | |
| 4006 | // Look for the loop invariant symbolic value. |
| 4007 | if (isa<SCEVUnknown>(Val: V)) |
| 4008 | return V; |
| 4009 | |
| 4010 | // Look through multiplies that scale a stride by a constant. |
| 4011 | match(S: V, P: m_scev_Mul(Op0: m_SCEVConstant(), Op1: m_SCEV(V))); |
| 4012 | if (auto *C = dyn_cast<SCEVIntegralCastExpr>(Val: V)) |
| 4013 | if (isa<SCEVUnknown>(Val: C->getOperand())) |
| 4014 | return V; |
| 4015 | |
| 4016 | return nullptr; |
| 4017 | } |
| 4018 | |
| 4019 | void LoopAccessInfo::collectStridedAccess(Value *MemAccess) { |
| 4020 | Value *Ptr = getLoadStorePointerOperand(V: MemAccess); |
| 4021 | if (!Ptr) |
| 4022 | return; |
| 4023 | |
| 4024 | // Note: getStrideFromPointer is a *profitability* heuristic. We |
| 4025 | // could broaden the scope of values returned here - to anything |
| 4026 | // which happens to be loop invariant and contributes to the |
| 4027 | // computation of an interesting IV - but we chose not to as we |
| 4028 | // don't have a cost model here, and broadening the scope exposes |
| 4029 | // far too many unprofitable cases. |
| 4030 | const SCEV *StrideExpr = getStrideFromPointer(Ptr, SE: PSE->getSE(), Lp: TheLoop); |
| 4031 | if (!StrideExpr) |
| 4032 | return; |
| 4033 | |
| 4034 | if (match(S: StrideExpr, P: m_scev_UndefOrPoison())) |
| 4035 | return; |
| 4036 | |
| 4037 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a strided access that is a candidate for " |
| 4038 | "versioning:" ); |
| 4039 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Ptr: " << *Ptr << " Stride: " << *StrideExpr << "\n" ); |
| 4040 | |
| 4041 | if (!SpeculateUnitStride) { |
| 4042 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Chose not to due to -laa-speculate-unit-stride\n" ); |
| 4043 | return; |
| 4044 | } |
| 4045 | |
| 4046 | // Avoid adding the "Stride == 1" predicate when we know that |
| 4047 | // Stride >= Trip-Count. Such a predicate will effectively optimize a single |
| 4048 | // or zero iteration loop, as Trip-Count <= Stride == 1. |
| 4049 | // |
| 4050 | // TODO: We are currently not making a very informed decision on when it is |
| 4051 | // beneficial to apply stride versioning. It might make more sense that the |
| 4052 | // users of this analysis (such as the vectorizer) will trigger it, based on |
| 4053 | // their specific cost considerations; For example, in cases where stride |
| 4054 | // versioning does not help resolving memory accesses/dependences, the |
| 4055 | // vectorizer should evaluate the cost of the runtime test, and the benefit |
| 4056 | // of various possible stride specializations, considering the alternatives |
| 4057 | // of using gather/scatters (if available). |
| 4058 | |
| 4059 | const SCEV *MaxBTC = PSE->getSymbolicMaxBackedgeTakenCount(); |
| 4060 | |
| 4061 | // Match the types so we can compare the stride and the MaxBTC. |
| 4062 | // The Stride can be positive/negative, so we sign extend Stride; |
| 4063 | // The backedgeTakenCount is non-negative, so we zero extend MaxBTC. |
| 4064 | const DataLayout &DL = TheLoop->getHeader()->getDataLayout(); |
| 4065 | uint64_t StrideTypeSizeBits = DL.getTypeSizeInBits(Ty: StrideExpr->getType()); |
| 4066 | uint64_t BETypeSizeBits = DL.getTypeSizeInBits(Ty: MaxBTC->getType()); |
| 4067 | const SCEV *CastedStride = StrideExpr; |
| 4068 | const SCEV *CastedBECount = MaxBTC; |
| 4069 | ScalarEvolution *SE = PSE->getSE(); |
| 4070 | if (BETypeSizeBits >= StrideTypeSizeBits) |
| 4071 | CastedStride = SE->getNoopOrSignExtend(V: StrideExpr, Ty: MaxBTC->getType()); |
| 4072 | else |
| 4073 | CastedBECount = SE->getZeroExtendExpr(Op: MaxBTC, Ty: StrideExpr->getType()); |
| 4074 | const SCEV *StrideMinusBETaken = SE->getMinusSCEV(LHS: CastedStride, RHS: CastedBECount); |
| 4075 | // Since TripCount == BackEdgeTakenCount + 1, checking: |
| 4076 | // "Stride >= TripCount" is equivalent to checking: |
| 4077 | // Stride - MaxBTC> 0 |
| 4078 | if (SE->isKnownPositive(S: StrideMinusBETaken)) { |
| 4079 | LLVM_DEBUG( |
| 4080 | dbgs() << "LAA: Stride>=TripCount; No point in versioning as the " |
| 4081 | "Stride==1 predicate will imply that the loop executes " |
| 4082 | "at most once.\n" ); |
| 4083 | return; |
| 4084 | } |
| 4085 | LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a strided access that we can version.\n" ); |
| 4086 | |
| 4087 | // Strip back off the integer cast, and check that our result is a |
| 4088 | // SCEVUnknown as we expect. |
| 4089 | const SCEV *StrideBase = StrideExpr; |
| 4090 | if (const auto *C = dyn_cast<SCEVIntegralCastExpr>(Val: StrideBase)) |
| 4091 | StrideBase = C->getOperand(); |
| 4092 | assert(SE->isLoopInvariant(StrideBase, TheLoop) && |
| 4093 | "users of the map rely on the stride being loop invariant" ); |
| 4094 | SymbolicStrides[Ptr] = cast<SCEVUnknown>(Val: StrideBase); |
| 4095 | } |
| 4096 | |
| 4097 | LoopAccessInfo::LoopAccessInfo(Loop *L, ScalarEvolution *SE, |
| 4098 | const TargetTransformInfo *TTI, |
| 4099 | const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, AAResults *AA, |
| 4100 | DominatorTree *DT, LoopInfo *LI, |
| 4101 | AssumptionCache *AC, bool AllowPartial) |
| 4102 | : PSE(std::make_unique<PredicatedScalarEvolution>(args&: *SE, args&: *L)), |
| 4103 | PtrRtChecking(nullptr), TheLoop(L), |
| 4104 | LoopGuards(ScalarEvolution::LoopGuards::collectOnDemand(L, SE&: *SE)), |
| 4105 | AllowPartial(AllowPartial) { |
| 4106 | unsigned MaxTargetVectorWidthInBits = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max(); |
| 4107 | if (TTI && !TTI->enableScalableVectorization()) |
| 4108 | // Scale the vector width by 2 as rough estimate to also consider |
| 4109 | // interleaving. |
| 4110 | MaxTargetVectorWidthInBits = |
| 4111 | TTI->getRegisterBitWidth(K: TargetTransformInfo::RGK_FixedWidthVector) * 2; |
| 4112 | |
| 4113 | DepChecker = std::make_unique<MemoryDepChecker>( |
| 4114 | args&: *PSE, args&: AC, args&: DT, args&: L, args&: SymbolicStrides, args&: MaxTargetVectorWidthInBits, args&: LoopGuards); |
| 4115 | PtrRtChecking = |
| 4116 | std::make_unique<RuntimePointerChecking>(args&: *DepChecker, args&: SE, args&: LoopGuards); |
| 4117 | if (canAnalyzeLoop()) |
| 4118 | CanVecMem = analyzeLoop(AA, LI, TLI, DT); |
| 4119 | } |
| 4120 | |
| 4121 | void LoopAccessInfo::print(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned Depth) const { |
| 4122 | if (CanVecMem) { |
| 4123 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "Memory dependences are safe" ; |
| 4124 | const MemoryDepChecker &DC = getDepChecker(); |
| 4125 | if (!DC.isSafeForAnyVectorWidth()) |
| 4126 | OS << " with a maximum safe vector width of " |
| 4127 | << DC.getMaxSafeVectorWidthInBits() << " bits" ; |
| 4128 | if (!DC.isSafeForAnyStoreLoadForwardDistances()) { |
| 4129 | uint64_t SLDist = DC.getStoreLoadForwardSafeDistanceInBits(); |
| 4130 | OS << ", with a maximum safe store-load forward width of " << SLDist |
| 4131 | << " bits" ; |
| 4132 | } |
| 4133 | if (PtrRtChecking->Need) |
| 4134 | OS << " with run-time checks" ; |
| 4135 | OS << "\n" ; |
| 4136 | } |
| 4137 | |
| 4138 | if (HasConvergentOp) |
| 4139 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "Has convergent operation in loop\n" ; |
| 4140 | |
| 4141 | if (Report) |
| 4142 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "Report: " << Report->getMsg() << "\n" ; |
| 4143 | |
| 4144 | if (auto *Dependences = DepChecker->getDependences()) { |
| 4145 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "Dependences:\n" ; |
| 4146 | for (const auto &Dep : *Dependences) { |
| 4147 | Dep.print(OS, Depth: Depth + 2, Instrs: DepChecker->getMemoryInstructions()); |
| 4148 | OS << "\n" ; |
| 4149 | } |
| 4150 | } else |
| 4151 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "Too many dependences, not recorded\n" ; |
| 4152 | |
| 4153 | // List the pair of accesses need run-time checks to prove independence. |
| 4154 | PtrRtChecking->print(OS, Depth); |
| 4155 | if (PtrRtChecking->Need && !HasCompletePtrRtChecking) |
| 4156 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "Generated run-time checks are incomplete\n" ; |
| 4157 | OS << "\n" ; |
| 4158 | |
| 4159 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) |
| 4160 | << "Non vectorizable stores to invariant address were " |
| 4161 | << (HasStoreStoreDependenceInvolvingLoopInvariantAddress || |
| 4162 | HasLoadStoreDependenceInvolvingLoopInvariantAddress |
| 4163 | ? "" |
| 4164 | : "not " ) |
| 4165 | << "found in loop.\n" ; |
| 4166 | |
| 4167 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "SCEV assumptions:\n" ; |
| 4168 | PSE->getPredicate().print(OS, Depth); |
| 4169 | |
| 4170 | OS << "\n" ; |
| 4171 | |
| 4172 | OS.indent(NumSpaces: Depth) << "Expressions re-written:\n" ; |
| 4173 | PSE->print(OS, Depth); |
| 4174 | } |
| 4175 | |
| 4176 | const LoopAccessInfo &LoopAccessInfoManager::getInfo(Loop &L, |
| 4177 | bool AllowPartial) { |
| 4178 | const auto &[It, Inserted] = LoopAccessInfoMap.try_emplace(Key: &L); |
| 4179 | |
| 4180 | // We need to create the LoopAccessInfo if either we don't already have one, |
| 4181 | // or if it was created with a different value of AllowPartial. |
| 4182 | if (Inserted || It->second->hasAllowPartial() != AllowPartial) |
| 4183 | It->second = std::make_unique<LoopAccessInfo>(args: &L, args: &SE, args&: TTI, args&: TLI, args: &AA, args: &DT, |
| 4184 | args: &LI, args&: AC, args&: AllowPartial); |
| 4185 | |
| 4186 | return *It->second; |
| 4187 | } |
| 4188 | void LoopAccessInfoManager::clear() { |
| 4189 | // Collect LoopAccessInfo entries that may keep references to IR outside the |
| 4190 | // analyzed loop or SCEVs that may have been modified or invalidated. At the |
| 4191 | // moment, that is loops requiring memory or SCEV runtime checks, as those cache |
| 4192 | // SCEVs, e.g. for pointer expressions. |
| 4193 | LoopAccessInfoMap.remove_if(Pred: [](const auto &Entry) { |
| 4194 | const auto &LAI = Entry.second; |
| 4195 | return !(LAI->getRuntimePointerChecking()->getChecks().empty() && |
| 4196 | LAI->getPSE().getPredicate().isAlwaysTrue()); |
| 4197 | }); |
| 4198 | } |
| 4199 | |
| 4200 | bool LoopAccessInfoManager::invalidate( |
| 4201 | Function &F, const PreservedAnalyses &PA, |
| 4202 | FunctionAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) { |
| 4203 | // Check whether our analysis is preserved. |
| 4204 | auto PAC = PA.getChecker<LoopAccessAnalysis>(); |
| 4205 | if (!PAC.preserved() && !PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<Function>>()) |
| 4206 | // If not, give up now. |
| 4207 | return true; |
| 4208 | |
| 4209 | // Check whether the analyses we depend on became invalid for any reason. |
| 4210 | // Skip checking TargetLibraryAnalysis as it is immutable and can't become |
| 4211 | // invalid. |
| 4212 | return Inv.invalidate<AAManager>(IR&: F, PA) || |
| 4213 | Inv.invalidate<ScalarEvolutionAnalysis>(IR&: F, PA) || |
| 4214 | Inv.invalidate<LoopAnalysis>(IR&: F, PA) || |
| 4215 | Inv.invalidate<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(IR&: F, PA); |
| 4216 | } |
| 4217 | |
| 4218 | LoopAccessInfoManager LoopAccessAnalysis::run(Function &F, |
| 4219 | FunctionAnalysisManager &FAM) { |
| 4220 | auto &SE = FAM.getResult<ScalarEvolutionAnalysis>(IR&: F); |
| 4221 | auto &AA = FAM.getResult<AAManager>(IR&: F); |
| 4222 | auto &DT = FAM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(IR&: F); |
| 4223 | auto &LI = FAM.getResult<LoopAnalysis>(IR&: F); |
| 4224 | auto &TTI = FAM.getResult<TargetIRAnalysis>(IR&: F); |
| 4225 | auto &TLI = FAM.getResult<TargetLibraryAnalysis>(IR&: F); |
| 4226 | auto &AC = FAM.getResult<AssumptionAnalysis>(IR&: F); |
| 4227 | return LoopAccessInfoManager(SE, AA, DT, LI, &TTI, &TLI, &AC); |
| 4228 | } |
| 4229 | |
| 4230 | AnalysisKey LoopAccessAnalysis::Key; |
| 4231 | |