| 1 | //===--- ASTConcept.cpp - Concepts Related AST Data Structures --*- C++ -*-===// |
| 2 | // |
| 3 | // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| 4 | // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| 5 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| 6 | // |
| 7 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| 8 | /// |
| 9 | /// \file |
| 10 | /// \brief This file defines AST data structures related to concepts. |
| 11 | /// |
| 12 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| 13 | |
| 14 | #include "clang/AST/ASTConcept.h" |
| 15 | #include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h" |
| 16 | #include "clang/AST/ExprConcepts.h" |
| 17 | #include "clang/AST/PrettyPrinter.h" |
| 18 | #include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h" |
| 19 | |
| 20 | using namespace clang; |
| 21 | |
| 22 | static void |
| 23 | CreateUnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(const ASTContext &C, |
| 24 | const UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord &Detail, |
| 25 | UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord *TrailingObject) { |
| 26 | if (auto *E = dyn_cast<Expr *>(Val: Detail)) |
| 27 | new (TrailingObject) UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(E); |
| 28 | else { |
| 29 | auto &SubstitutionDiagnostic = |
| 30 | *cast<std::pair<SourceLocation, StringRef> *>(Val: Detail); |
| 31 | StringRef Message = C.backupStr(S: SubstitutionDiagnostic.second); |
| 32 | auto *NewSubstDiag = new (C) std::pair<SourceLocation, StringRef>( |
| 33 | SubstitutionDiagnostic.first, Message); |
| 34 | new (TrailingObject) UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(NewSubstDiag); |
| 35 | } |
| 36 | } |
| 37 | |
| 38 | ASTConstraintSatisfaction::ASTConstraintSatisfaction( |
| 39 | const ASTContext &C, const ConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) |
| 40 | : NumRecords{Satisfaction.Details.size()}, |
| 41 | IsSatisfied{Satisfaction.IsSatisfied}, ContainsErrors{ |
| 42 | Satisfaction.ContainsErrors} { |
| 43 | for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumRecords; ++I) |
| 44 | CreateUnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(C, Detail: Satisfaction.Details[I], |
| 45 | TrailingObject: getTrailingObjects() + I); |
| 46 | } |
| 47 | |
| 48 | ASTConstraintSatisfaction::ASTConstraintSatisfaction( |
| 49 | const ASTContext &C, const ASTConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) |
| 50 | : NumRecords{Satisfaction.NumRecords}, |
| 51 | IsSatisfied{Satisfaction.IsSatisfied}, |
| 52 | ContainsErrors{Satisfaction.ContainsErrors} { |
| 53 | for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumRecords; ++I) |
| 54 | CreateUnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(C, Detail: *(Satisfaction.begin() + I), |
| 55 | TrailingObject: getTrailingObjects() + I); |
| 56 | } |
| 57 | |
| 58 | ASTConstraintSatisfaction * |
| 59 | ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Create(const ASTContext &C, |
| 60 | const ConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) { |
| 61 | std::size_t size = |
| 62 | totalSizeToAlloc<UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord>( |
| 63 | Counts: Satisfaction.Details.size()); |
| 64 | void *Mem = C.Allocate(Size: size, Align: alignof(ASTConstraintSatisfaction)); |
| 65 | return new (Mem) ASTConstraintSatisfaction(C, Satisfaction); |
| 66 | } |
| 67 | |
| 68 | ASTConstraintSatisfaction *ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Rebuild( |
| 69 | const ASTContext &C, const ASTConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) { |
| 70 | std::size_t size = |
| 71 | totalSizeToAlloc<UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord>(Counts: Satisfaction.NumRecords); |
| 72 | void *Mem = C.Allocate(Size: size, Align: alignof(ASTConstraintSatisfaction)); |
| 73 | return new (Mem) ASTConstraintSatisfaction(C, Satisfaction); |
| 74 | } |
| 75 | |
| 76 | void ConstraintSatisfaction::Profile( |
| 77 | llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &ID, const ASTContext &C, |
| 78 | const NamedDecl *ConstraintOwner, ArrayRef<TemplateArgument> TemplateArgs) { |
| 79 | ID.AddPointer(Ptr: ConstraintOwner); |
| 80 | ID.AddInteger(I: TemplateArgs.size()); |
| 81 | for (auto &Arg : TemplateArgs) |
| 82 | Arg.Profile(ID, Context: C); |
| 83 | } |
| 84 | |
| 85 | ConceptReference * |
| 86 | ConceptReference::Create(const ASTContext &C, NestedNameSpecifierLoc NNS, |
| 87 | SourceLocation TemplateKWLoc, |
| 88 | DeclarationNameInfo ConceptNameInfo, |
| 89 | NamedDecl *FoundDecl, ConceptDecl *NamedConcept, |
| 90 | const ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo *ArgsAsWritten) { |
| 91 | return new (C) ConceptReference(NNS, TemplateKWLoc, ConceptNameInfo, |
| 92 | FoundDecl, NamedConcept, ArgsAsWritten); |
| 93 | } |
| 94 | |
| 95 | void ConceptReference::print(llvm::raw_ostream &OS, |
| 96 | const PrintingPolicy &Policy) const { |
| 97 | if (NestedNameSpec) |
| 98 | NestedNameSpec.getNestedNameSpecifier()->print(OS, Policy); |
| 99 | ConceptName.printName(OS, Policy); |
| 100 | if (hasExplicitTemplateArgs()) { |
| 101 | OS << "<" ; |
| 102 | llvm::ListSeparator Sep(", " ); |
| 103 | // FIXME: Find corresponding parameter for argument |
| 104 | for (auto &ArgLoc : ArgsAsWritten->arguments()) { |
| 105 | OS << Sep; |
| 106 | ArgLoc.getArgument().print(Policy, Out&: OS, /*IncludeType*/ false); |
| 107 | } |
| 108 | OS << ">" ; |
| 109 | } |
| 110 | } |
| 111 | |
| 112 | concepts::ExprRequirement::ExprRequirement( |
| 113 | Expr *E, bool IsSimple, SourceLocation NoexceptLoc, |
| 114 | ReturnTypeRequirement Req, SatisfactionStatus Status, |
| 115 | ConceptSpecializationExpr *SubstitutedConstraintExpr) |
| 116 | : Requirement(IsSimple ? RK_Simple : RK_Compound, Status == SS_Dependent, |
| 117 | Status == SS_Dependent && |
| 118 | (E->containsUnexpandedParameterPack() || |
| 119 | Req.containsUnexpandedParameterPack()), |
| 120 | Status == SS_Satisfied), |
| 121 | Value(E), NoexceptLoc(NoexceptLoc), TypeReq(Req), |
| 122 | SubstitutedConstraintExpr(SubstitutedConstraintExpr), Status(Status) { |
| 123 | assert((!IsSimple || (Req.isEmpty() && NoexceptLoc.isInvalid())) && |
| 124 | "Simple requirement must not have a return type requirement or a " |
| 125 | "noexcept specification" ); |
| 126 | assert((Status > SS_TypeRequirementSubstitutionFailure && |
| 127 | Req.isTypeConstraint()) == (SubstitutedConstraintExpr != nullptr)); |
| 128 | } |
| 129 | |
| 130 | concepts::ExprRequirement::ExprRequirement( |
| 131 | SubstitutionDiagnostic *ExprSubstDiag, bool IsSimple, |
| 132 | SourceLocation NoexceptLoc, ReturnTypeRequirement Req) |
| 133 | : Requirement(IsSimple ? RK_Simple : RK_Compound, Req.isDependent(), |
| 134 | Req.containsUnexpandedParameterPack(), /*IsSatisfied=*/false), |
| 135 | Value(ExprSubstDiag), NoexceptLoc(NoexceptLoc), TypeReq(Req), |
| 136 | Status(SS_ExprSubstitutionFailure) { |
| 137 | assert((!IsSimple || (Req.isEmpty() && NoexceptLoc.isInvalid())) && |
| 138 | "Simple requirement must not have a return type requirement or a " |
| 139 | "noexcept specification" ); |
| 140 | } |
| 141 | |
| 142 | concepts::ExprRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement( |
| 143 | TemplateParameterList *TPL) |
| 144 | : TypeConstraintInfo(TPL, false) { |
| 145 | assert(TPL->size() == 1); |
| 146 | const TypeConstraint *TC = |
| 147 | cast<TemplateTypeParmDecl>(Val: TPL->getParam(Idx: 0))->getTypeConstraint(); |
| 148 | assert(TC && |
| 149 | "TPL must have a template type parameter with a type constraint" ); |
| 150 | auto *Constraint = |
| 151 | cast<ConceptSpecializationExpr>(Val: TC->getImmediatelyDeclaredConstraint()); |
| 152 | bool Dependent = |
| 153 | Constraint->getTemplateArgsAsWritten() && |
| 154 | TemplateSpecializationType::anyInstantiationDependentTemplateArguments( |
| 155 | Args: Constraint->getTemplateArgsAsWritten()->arguments().drop_front(N: 1)); |
| 156 | TypeConstraintInfo.setInt(Dependent ? true : false); |
| 157 | } |
| 158 | |
| 159 | concepts::TypeRequirement::TypeRequirement(TypeSourceInfo *T) |
| 160 | : Requirement(RK_Type, T->getType()->isInstantiationDependentType(), |
| 161 | T->getType()->containsUnexpandedParameterPack(), |
| 162 | // We reach this ctor with either dependent types (in which |
| 163 | // IsSatisfied doesn't matter) or with non-dependent type in |
| 164 | // which the existence of the type indicates satisfaction. |
| 165 | /*IsSatisfied=*/true), |
| 166 | Value(T), |
| 167 | Status(T->getType()->isInstantiationDependentType() ? SS_Dependent |
| 168 | : SS_Satisfied) {} |
| 169 | |