| 1 | //===-- VPlanVerifier.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// |
| 2 | // |
| 3 | // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| 4 | // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| 5 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| 6 | // |
| 7 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| 8 | /// |
| 9 | /// \file |
| 10 | /// This file defines the class VPlanVerifier, which contains utility functions |
| 11 | /// to check the consistency and invariants of a VPlan. |
| 12 | /// |
| 13 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| 14 | |
| 15 | #include "VPlanVerifier.h" |
| 16 | #include "VPlan.h" |
| 17 | #include "VPlanCFG.h" |
| 18 | #include "VPlanDominatorTree.h" |
| 19 | #include "VPlanHelpers.h" |
| 20 | #include "VPlanPatternMatch.h" |
| 21 | #include "VPlanUtils.h" |
| 22 | #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" |
| 23 | |
| 24 | #define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-vectorize" |
| 25 | |
| 26 | using namespace llvm; |
| 27 | using namespace VPlanPatternMatch; |
| 28 | |
| 29 | namespace { |
| 30 | class VPlanVerifier { |
| 31 | const VPDominatorTree &VPDT; |
| 32 | |
| 33 | SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock *, 8> WrappedIRBBs; |
| 34 | |
| 35 | // Verify that phi-like recipes are at the beginning of \p VPBB, with no |
| 36 | // other recipes in between. Also check that only header blocks contain |
| 37 | // VPHeaderPHIRecipes. |
| 38 | bool verifyPhiRecipes(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB); |
| 39 | |
| 40 | /// Verify that \p LastActiveLane's operand is guaranteed to be a prefix-mask. |
| 41 | bool verifyLastActiveLaneRecipe(const VPInstruction &LastActiveLane) const; |
| 42 | |
| 43 | bool verifyVPBasicBlock(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB); |
| 44 | |
| 45 | bool verifyBlock(const VPBlockBase *VPB); |
| 46 | |
| 47 | /// Helper function that verifies the CFG invariants of the VPBlockBases |
| 48 | /// within |
| 49 | /// \p Region. Checks in this function are generic for VPBlockBases. They are |
| 50 | /// not specific for VPBasicBlocks or VPRegionBlocks. |
| 51 | bool verifyBlocksInRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region); |
| 52 | |
| 53 | /// Verify the CFG invariants of VPRegionBlock \p Region and its nested |
| 54 | /// VPBlockBases. Do not recurse inside nested VPRegionBlocks. |
| 55 | bool verifyRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region); |
| 56 | |
| 57 | /// Verify the CFG invariants of VPRegionBlock \p Region and its nested |
| 58 | /// VPBlockBases. Recurse inside nested VPRegionBlocks. |
| 59 | bool verifyRegionRec(const VPRegionBlock *Region); |
| 60 | |
| 61 | public: |
| 62 | VPlanVerifier(VPDominatorTree &VPDT) : VPDT(VPDT) {} |
| 63 | |
| 64 | bool verify(const VPlan &Plan); |
| 65 | }; |
| 66 | } // namespace |
| 67 | |
| 68 | bool VPlanVerifier::verifyPhiRecipes(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB) { |
| 69 | auto RecipeI = VPBB->begin(); |
| 70 | auto End = VPBB->end(); |
| 71 | unsigned NumActiveLaneMaskPhiRecipes = 0; |
| 72 | bool = VPBlockUtils::isHeader(VPB: VPBB, VPDT); |
| 73 | while (RecipeI != End && RecipeI->isPhi()) { |
| 74 | if (isa<VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe>(Val: RecipeI)) |
| 75 | NumActiveLaneMaskPhiRecipes++; |
| 76 | |
| 77 | if (IsHeaderVPBB && |
| 78 | !isa<VPHeaderPHIRecipe, VPWidenPHIRecipe, VPPhi>(Val: *RecipeI)) { |
| 79 | errs() << "Found non-header PHI recipe in header VPBB" ; |
| 80 | #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| 81 | errs() << ": " ; |
| 82 | RecipeI->dump(); |
| 83 | #endif |
| 84 | return false; |
| 85 | } |
| 86 | |
| 87 | if (!IsHeaderVPBB && isa<VPHeaderPHIRecipe>(Val: *RecipeI)) { |
| 88 | errs() << "Found header PHI recipe in non-header VPBB" ; |
| 89 | #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| 90 | errs() << ": " ; |
| 91 | RecipeI->dump(); |
| 92 | #endif |
| 93 | return false; |
| 94 | } |
| 95 | |
| 96 | // In region form, VPCurrentIterationPHIRecipe must be the first header phi |
| 97 | // recipe. In a plain CFG VPlan, it must either be the first or second. |
| 98 | if (isa<VPCurrentIterationPHIRecipe>(Val: RecipeI) && |
| 99 | (VPBB->getPlan()->getVectorLoopRegion() |
| 100 | ? RecipeI->getIterator() != VPBB->begin() |
| 101 | : RecipeI->getIterator() != VPBB->begin() && |
| 102 | RecipeI->getIterator() != std::next(x: VPBB->begin()))) { |
| 103 | errs() << "CurrentIteration PHI is not the first/second recipe\n" ; |
| 104 | return false; |
| 105 | } |
| 106 | |
| 107 | // Check if the recipe operands match the number of predecessors. |
| 108 | // TODO Extend to other phi-like recipes. |
| 109 | if (auto *PhiIRI = dyn_cast<VPIRPhi>(Val: &*RecipeI)) { |
| 110 | if (PhiIRI->getNumOperands() != VPBB->getNumPredecessors()) { |
| 111 | errs() << "Phi-like recipe with different number of operands and " |
| 112 | "predecessors.\n" ; |
| 113 | // TODO: Print broken recipe. At the moment printing an ill-formed |
| 114 | // phi-like recipe may crash. |
| 115 | return false; |
| 116 | } |
| 117 | } |
| 118 | |
| 119 | RecipeI++; |
| 120 | } |
| 121 | |
| 122 | if (!VPBB->getPlan()->isUnrolled() && NumActiveLaneMaskPhiRecipes > 1) { |
| 123 | errs() << "There should be no more than one VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe" ; |
| 124 | return false; |
| 125 | } |
| 126 | |
| 127 | while (RecipeI != End) { |
| 128 | if (RecipeI->isPhi() && !isa<VPBlendRecipe>(Val: &*RecipeI)) { |
| 129 | errs() << "Found phi-like recipe after non-phi recipe" ; |
| 130 | |
| 131 | #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| 132 | errs() << ": " ; |
| 133 | RecipeI->dump(); |
| 134 | errs() << "after\n" ; |
| 135 | std::prev(RecipeI)->dump(); |
| 136 | #endif |
| 137 | return false; |
| 138 | } |
| 139 | RecipeI++; |
| 140 | } |
| 141 | return true; |
| 142 | } |
| 143 | |
| 144 | static bool isKnownMonotonic(VPValue *V) { |
| 145 | VPValue *X, *Y; |
| 146 | if (match(V, P: m_Add(Op0: m_VPValue(V&: X), Op1: m_VPValue(V&: Y)))) |
| 147 | return cast<VPRecipeWithIRFlags>(Val: V)->hasNoUnsignedWrap() && |
| 148 | isKnownMonotonic(V: X) && isKnownMonotonic(V: Y); |
| 149 | if (match(V, P: m_StepVector())) |
| 150 | return true; |
| 151 | // Only handle a subset of IVs until we can guarantee there's no overflow. |
| 152 | if (auto *WidenIV = dyn_cast<VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe>(Val: V)) |
| 153 | return WidenIV->isCanonical() || WidenIV->hasNoUnsignedWrap(); |
| 154 | if (auto *Steps = dyn_cast<VPScalarIVStepsRecipe>(Val: V)) |
| 155 | return match(V: Steps->getOperand(N: 0), |
| 156 | P: m_CombineOr( |
| 157 | Ps: m_CanonicalIV(), |
| 158 | Ps: m_DerivedIV(Op0: m_ZeroInt(), Op1: m_CanonicalIV(), Op2: m_One()))) && |
| 159 | match(V: Steps->getStepValue(), P: m_One()); |
| 160 | if (isa<VPWidenCanonicalIVRecipe>(Val: V)) |
| 161 | return true; |
| 162 | return vputils::isUniformAcrossVFsAndUFs(V); |
| 163 | } |
| 164 | |
| 165 | bool VPlanVerifier::verifyLastActiveLaneRecipe( |
| 166 | const VPInstruction &LastActiveLane) const { |
| 167 | assert(LastActiveLane.getOpcode() == VPInstruction::LastActiveLane && |
| 168 | "must be called with VPInstruction::LastActiveLane" ); |
| 169 | |
| 170 | if (LastActiveLane.getNumOperands() < 1) { |
| 171 | errs() << "LastActiveLane must have at least one operand\n" ; |
| 172 | return false; |
| 173 | } |
| 174 | |
| 175 | const VPlan &Plan = *LastActiveLane.getParent()->getPlan(); |
| 176 | // All operands must be prefix-mask. This means an icmp ult/ule LHS, RHS where |
| 177 | // the LHS is monotonically increasing and RHS is uniform across VFs and UF. |
| 178 | for (VPValue *Op : LastActiveLane.operands()) { |
| 179 | VPValue *Mask = Op; |
| 180 | VPValue *; |
| 181 | |
| 182 | // Look through any `and`s with a loop_dependence_war_mask, which is always |
| 183 | // a prefix mask. TODO: Verify the full loop.dependence.mask chain. |
| 184 | if (match(V: Op, |
| 185 | P: m_c_BinaryAnd( |
| 186 | Op0: m_VPValue(V&: HeaderMask), |
| 187 | Op1: m_CombineOr( |
| 188 | Ps: m_c_BinaryAnd( |
| 189 | Op0: m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::loop_dependence_war_mask>(), |
| 190 | Op1: m_VPValue()), |
| 191 | Ps: m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::loop_dependence_war_mask>())))) |
| 192 | Mask = HeaderMask; |
| 193 | |
| 194 | if (vputils::isHeaderMask(V: Mask, Plan)) |
| 195 | continue; |
| 196 | |
| 197 | if (match(V: Mask, P: m_ActiveLaneMask(Op0: m_VPValue(), Op1: m_VPValue(), Op2: m_VPValue()))) |
| 198 | continue; |
| 199 | |
| 200 | CmpPredicate Pred; |
| 201 | VPValue *LHS, *RHS; |
| 202 | if (match(V: Mask, P: m_ICmp(Pred, Op0: m_VPValue(V&: LHS), Op1: m_VPValue(V&: RHS))) && |
| 203 | (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_ULE || Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_ULT) && |
| 204 | isKnownMonotonic(V: LHS) && |
| 205 | (vputils::isUniformAcrossVFsAndUFs(V: RHS) || |
| 206 | match(V: RHS, P: m_EVL(Op0: m_VPValue())))) |
| 207 | continue; |
| 208 | |
| 209 | errs() << "LastActiveLane operand " ; |
| 210 | #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| 211 | VPSlotTracker Tracker(&Plan); |
| 212 | Op->printAsOperand(errs(), Tracker); |
| 213 | #endif |
| 214 | errs() << " must be prefix mask (a header mask or an " |
| 215 | "EVL-derived mask currently)\n" ; |
| 216 | return false; |
| 217 | } |
| 218 | |
| 219 | return true; |
| 220 | } |
| 221 | |
| 222 | bool VPlanVerifier::verifyVPBasicBlock(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB) { |
| 223 | if (!verifyPhiRecipes(VPBB)) |
| 224 | return false; |
| 225 | |
| 226 | // Verify that defs in VPBB dominate all their uses. |
| 227 | DenseMap<const VPRecipeBase *, unsigned> RecipeNumbering; |
| 228 | unsigned Cnt = 0; |
| 229 | for (const VPRecipeBase &R : *VPBB) |
| 230 | RecipeNumbering[&R] = Cnt++; |
| 231 | |
| 232 | for (const VPRecipeBase &R : *VPBB) { |
| 233 | if (isa<VPIRInstruction>(Val: &R) && !isa<VPIRBasicBlock>(Val: VPBB)) { |
| 234 | errs() << "VPIRInstructions " ; |
| 235 | #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| 236 | R.dump(); |
| 237 | errs() << " " ; |
| 238 | #endif |
| 239 | errs() << "not in a VPIRBasicBlock!\n" ; |
| 240 | return false; |
| 241 | } |
| 242 | for (const VPValue *V : R.definedValues()) { |
| 243 | // Verify that each defined value has a scalar type. |
| 244 | if (!V->getScalarType()) { |
| 245 | errs() << "VPValue without scalar type!\n" ; |
| 246 | return false; |
| 247 | } |
| 248 | |
| 249 | // MaskedCond may be used from blocks it don't dominate; the block will be |
| 250 | // linearized and it will dominate its users after linearization. |
| 251 | if (match(V: &R, P: m_VPInstruction<VPInstruction::MaskedCond>())) |
| 252 | continue; |
| 253 | |
| 254 | for (const VPUser *U : V->users()) { |
| 255 | auto *UI = cast<VPRecipeBase>(Val: U); |
| 256 | if (isa<VPIRPhi>(Val: UI) && |
| 257 | UI->getNumOperands() != UI->getParent()->getNumPredecessors()) { |
| 258 | errs() << "Phi-like recipe with different number of operands and " |
| 259 | "predecessors.\n" ; |
| 260 | return false; |
| 261 | } |
| 262 | |
| 263 | if (auto *Phi = dyn_cast<VPPhiAccessors>(Val: UI)) { |
| 264 | for (const auto &[IncomingVPV, IncomingVPBB] : |
| 265 | Phi->incoming_values_and_blocks()) { |
| 266 | if (IncomingVPV != V) |
| 267 | continue; |
| 268 | |
| 269 | if (VPDT.dominates(A: VPBB, B: IncomingVPBB)) |
| 270 | continue; |
| 271 | |
| 272 | errs() << "Incoming def does not dominate incoming block!\n" ; |
| 273 | #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| 274 | VPSlotTracker Tracker(VPBB->getPlan()); |
| 275 | IncomingVPV->getDefiningRecipe()->print(errs(), " " , Tracker); |
| 276 | errs() << "\n does not dominate " << IncomingVPBB->getName() |
| 277 | << " for\n" ; |
| 278 | UI->print(errs(), " " , Tracker); |
| 279 | #endif |
| 280 | return false; |
| 281 | } |
| 282 | continue; |
| 283 | } |
| 284 | // TODO: Also verify VPPredInstPHIRecipe. |
| 285 | if (isa<VPPredInstPHIRecipe>(Val: UI)) |
| 286 | continue; |
| 287 | |
| 288 | // If the user is in the same block, check it comes after R in the |
| 289 | // block. |
| 290 | if (UI->getParent() == VPBB) { |
| 291 | if (RecipeNumbering[UI] >= RecipeNumbering[&R]) |
| 292 | continue; |
| 293 | } else { |
| 294 | if (VPDT.dominates(A: VPBB, B: UI->getParent())) |
| 295 | continue; |
| 296 | } |
| 297 | |
| 298 | // Recipes in blocks with a MaskedCond may be used in exit blocks; the |
| 299 | // block will be linearized and its recipes will dominate their users |
| 300 | // after linearization. |
| 301 | bool BlockHasMaskedCond = any_of(Range: *VPBB, P: [](const VPRecipeBase &R) { |
| 302 | return match(V: &R, P: m_VPInstruction<VPInstruction::MaskedCond>()); |
| 303 | }); |
| 304 | if (BlockHasMaskedCond && |
| 305 | any_of(Range: VPBB->getPlan()->getExitBlocks(), P: [UI](VPIRBasicBlock *EB) { |
| 306 | return is_contained(Range&: EB->getPredecessors(), Element: UI->getParent()); |
| 307 | })) { |
| 308 | continue; |
| 309 | } |
| 310 | |
| 311 | errs() << "Use before def!\n" ; |
| 312 | #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| 313 | VPSlotTracker Tracker(VPBB->getPlan()); |
| 314 | UI->print(errs(), " " , Tracker); |
| 315 | errs() << "\n before\n" ; |
| 316 | R.print(errs(), " " , Tracker); |
| 317 | errs() << "\n" ; |
| 318 | #endif |
| 319 | return false; |
| 320 | } |
| 321 | } |
| 322 | if (const auto *VPI = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(Val: &R)) { |
| 323 | switch (VPI->getOpcode()) { |
| 324 | case VPInstruction::LastActiveLane: |
| 325 | if (!verifyLastActiveLaneRecipe(LastActiveLane: *VPI)) |
| 326 | return false; |
| 327 | break; |
| 328 | default: |
| 329 | break; |
| 330 | } |
| 331 | } |
| 332 | if (const auto *ScalarIVSteps = dyn_cast<VPScalarIVStepsRecipe>(Val: &R)) { |
| 333 | unsigned NumOps = ScalarIVSteps->getNumOperands(); |
| 334 | if (NumOps != 3 && NumOps != 4) { |
| 335 | errs() << "VPScalarIVStepsRecipe must have 3 or 4 operands\n" ; |
| 336 | return false; |
| 337 | } |
| 338 | } |
| 339 | } |
| 340 | |
| 341 | auto *IRBB = dyn_cast<VPIRBasicBlock>(Val: VPBB); |
| 342 | if (!IRBB) |
| 343 | return true; |
| 344 | |
| 345 | if (!WrappedIRBBs.insert(Ptr: IRBB->getIRBasicBlock()).second) { |
| 346 | errs() << "Same IR basic block used by multiple wrapper blocks!\n" ; |
| 347 | return false; |
| 348 | } |
| 349 | |
| 350 | return true; |
| 351 | } |
| 352 | |
| 353 | bool VPlanVerifier::verifyBlock(const VPBlockBase *VPB) { |
| 354 | auto *VPBB = dyn_cast<VPBasicBlock>(Val: VPB); |
| 355 | // Check block's condition bit. |
| 356 | if (VPBB && !isa<VPIRBasicBlock>(Val: VPB)) { |
| 357 | // For plain CFG VPlans, verify header and latch block structure. |
| 358 | if (!VPBB->getParent()) { |
| 359 | if (VPBlockUtils::isHeader(VPB: VPBB, VPDT)) { |
| 360 | if (VPB->getNumPredecessors() != 2) { |
| 361 | errs() |
| 362 | << "Header block in plain CFG VPlan must have 2 predecessors!\n" ; |
| 363 | return false; |
| 364 | } |
| 365 | // Predecessor 0 is preheader, predecessor 1 is latch. |
| 366 | if (!VPBlockUtils::isLatch(VPB: VPB->getPredecessors()[1], VPDT)) { |
| 367 | errs() << "Header's second predecessor must be the latch!\n" ; |
| 368 | return false; |
| 369 | } |
| 370 | } |
| 371 | |
| 372 | if (VPBlockUtils::isLatch(VPB: VPBB, VPDT)) { |
| 373 | auto BranchTerminator = |
| 374 | m_CombineOr(Ps: m_BranchOnCond(), |
| 375 | Ps: m_CombineOr(Ps: m_BranchOnCount(), Ps: m_BranchOnTwoConds())); |
| 376 | if (!match(V: VPBB->getTerminator(), P: BranchTerminator)) { |
| 377 | errs() << "Latch block must have a branch terminator!\n" ; |
| 378 | return false; |
| 379 | } |
| 380 | // Successor 0 is middle block, successor 1 is header. |
| 381 | if (VPBlockUtils::isHeader(VPB: VPB->getSuccessors()[0], VPDT)) { |
| 382 | errs() << "Latch's first successor must not be the header (must be " |
| 383 | "middle block)!\n" ; |
| 384 | return false; |
| 385 | } |
| 386 | } |
| 387 | } else if (VPB->getNumSuccessors() > 1 || |
| 388 | (VPBB->isExiting() && !VPBB->getParent()->isReplicator())) { |
| 389 | if (!VPBB->getTerminator()) { |
| 390 | errs() << "Block has multiple successors but doesn't " |
| 391 | "have a proper branch recipe!\n" ; |
| 392 | return false; |
| 393 | } |
| 394 | } else if (VPBB->getTerminator()) { |
| 395 | errs() << "Unexpected branch recipe!\n" ; |
| 396 | return false; |
| 397 | } |
| 398 | } |
| 399 | |
| 400 | // Check block's successors. |
| 401 | const auto &Successors = VPB->getSuccessors(); |
| 402 | for (const VPBlockBase *Succ : Successors) { |
| 403 | // There must be a bi-directional link between block and successor. |
| 404 | const auto &SuccPreds = Succ->getPredecessors(); |
| 405 | if (!is_contained(Range: SuccPreds, Element: VPB)) { |
| 406 | errs() << "Missing predecessor link.\n" ; |
| 407 | return false; |
| 408 | } |
| 409 | } |
| 410 | |
| 411 | // Check block's predecessors. |
| 412 | const auto &Predecessors = VPB->getPredecessors(); |
| 413 | |
| 414 | for (const VPBlockBase *Pred : Predecessors) { |
| 415 | // Block and predecessor must be inside the same region. |
| 416 | if (Pred->getParent() != VPB->getParent()) { |
| 417 | errs() << "Predecessor is not in the same region.\n" ; |
| 418 | return false; |
| 419 | } |
| 420 | |
| 421 | // There must be a bi-directional link between block and predecessor. |
| 422 | const auto &PredSuccs = Pred->getSuccessors(); |
| 423 | if (!is_contained(Range: PredSuccs, Element: VPB)) { |
| 424 | errs() << "Missing successor link.\n" ; |
| 425 | return false; |
| 426 | } |
| 427 | } |
| 428 | return !VPBB || verifyVPBasicBlock(VPBB); |
| 429 | } |
| 430 | |
| 431 | bool VPlanVerifier::verifyBlocksInRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region) { |
| 432 | for (const VPBlockBase *VPB : vp_depth_first_shallow(G: Region->getEntry())) { |
| 433 | // Check block's parent. |
| 434 | if (VPB->getParent() != Region) { |
| 435 | errs() << "VPBlockBase has wrong parent\n" ; |
| 436 | return false; |
| 437 | } |
| 438 | |
| 439 | if (!verifyBlock(VPB)) |
| 440 | return false; |
| 441 | } |
| 442 | return true; |
| 443 | } |
| 444 | |
| 445 | bool VPlanVerifier::verifyRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region) { |
| 446 | const VPBlockBase *Entry = Region->getEntry(); |
| 447 | const VPBlockBase *Exiting = Region->getExiting(); |
| 448 | |
| 449 | // Entry and Exiting shouldn't have any predecessor/successor, respectively. |
| 450 | if (Entry->hasPredecessors()) { |
| 451 | errs() << "region entry block has predecessors\n" ; |
| 452 | return false; |
| 453 | } |
| 454 | if (Exiting->getNumSuccessors() != 0) { |
| 455 | errs() << "region exiting block has successors\n" ; |
| 456 | return false; |
| 457 | } |
| 458 | |
| 459 | return verifyBlocksInRegion(Region); |
| 460 | } |
| 461 | |
| 462 | bool VPlanVerifier::verifyRegionRec(const VPRegionBlock *Region) { |
| 463 | // Recurse inside nested regions and check all blocks inside the region. |
| 464 | return verifyRegion(Region) && |
| 465 | all_of(Range: vp_depth_first_shallow(G: Region->getEntry()), |
| 466 | P: [this](const VPBlockBase *VPB) { |
| 467 | const auto *SubRegion = dyn_cast<VPRegionBlock>(Val: VPB); |
| 468 | return !SubRegion || verifyRegionRec(Region: SubRegion); |
| 469 | }); |
| 470 | } |
| 471 | |
| 472 | bool VPlanVerifier::verify(const VPlan &Plan) { |
| 473 | if (any_of(Range: vp_depth_first_shallow(G: Plan.getEntry()), |
| 474 | P: [this](const VPBlockBase *VPB) { return !verifyBlock(VPB); })) |
| 475 | return false; |
| 476 | |
| 477 | const VPRegionBlock *TopRegion = Plan.getVectorLoopRegion(); |
| 478 | // TODO: Verify all blocks using vp_depth_first_deep iterators. |
| 479 | if (!TopRegion) |
| 480 | return true; |
| 481 | |
| 482 | if (!verifyRegionRec(Region: TopRegion)) |
| 483 | return false; |
| 484 | |
| 485 | if (TopRegion->getParent()) { |
| 486 | errs() << "VPlan Top Region should have no parent.\n" ; |
| 487 | return false; |
| 488 | } |
| 489 | |
| 490 | const VPBasicBlock *Entry = dyn_cast<VPBasicBlock>(Val: TopRegion->getEntry()); |
| 491 | if (!Entry) { |
| 492 | errs() << "VPlan entry block is not a VPBasicBlock\n" ; |
| 493 | return false; |
| 494 | } |
| 495 | |
| 496 | const VPBasicBlock *Exiting = dyn_cast<VPBasicBlock>(Val: TopRegion->getExiting()); |
| 497 | if (!Exiting) { |
| 498 | errs() << "VPlan exiting block is not a VPBasicBlock\n" ; |
| 499 | return false; |
| 500 | } |
| 501 | |
| 502 | if (Exiting->empty()) { |
| 503 | errs() << "VPlan vector loop exiting block must end with BranchOnCount, " |
| 504 | "BranchOnCond, or BranchOnTwoConds VPInstruction but is empty\n" ; |
| 505 | return false; |
| 506 | } |
| 507 | |
| 508 | auto *LastInst = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(Val: std::prev(x: Exiting->end())); |
| 509 | if (!match(V: LastInst, P: m_CombineOr(Ps: m_BranchOnCond(), |
| 510 | Ps: m_CombineOr(Ps: m_BranchOnCount(), |
| 511 | Ps: m_BranchOnTwoConds())))) { |
| 512 | errs() << "VPlan vector loop exit must end with BranchOnCount, " |
| 513 | "BranchOnCond, or BranchOnTwoConds VPInstruction\n" ; |
| 514 | return false; |
| 515 | } |
| 516 | |
| 517 | return true; |
| 518 | } |
| 519 | |
| 520 | bool llvm::verifyVPlanIsValid(const VPlan &Plan) { |
| 521 | VPDominatorTree VPDT(const_cast<VPlan &>(Plan)); |
| 522 | VPlanVerifier Verifier(VPDT); |
| 523 | return Verifier.verify(Plan); |
| 524 | } |
| 525 | |